Deserving Hall of Fame Pitchers

Why Bobby Matthews and Tommy John Should Be in Baseball's Hall of Fame

By Ryan Lester, published Oct 05, 2007
Published Content: 107  Total Views: 11,606  Favorited By: 6 CPs
Rating: 4.6 of 5
The first is Bobby Matthews. He pitched from 1871-1887 and compiled 297 wins for the Fort Wayne Kekiongas, the Baltimore Canaries, the New York Mutuals, the Cincinnati Reds, the Providence Grays, the Boston Red Caps, and the Philadelphia Athletics. His career ERA was 2.89. If he had three more wins, 1 more win every five years of his career, he would have been a lock for the Hall of Fame. He had a three year stretch where he went 96-63. He has another three year stretch where he was 90-48. He was in the top 10 ten times in ERA (including leading the league in 1874), twelve times in Wins (2nd in 1874 with 42), twelve times in Winning Percentage, nine times in Strikeouts (led the league twice). He won 25 or more games seven times in his career. He was the first to develop the spit ball. He also was one of the first pitchers to master the curve and sinking fastball. He's the only pitcher to win 50 games in three different major leagues (National Association, National League, and American Association). He was the winning pitcher in baseball's first professional league. In 1878 and 1880 he pitched in non-sanctioned leagues for more money, so he is not credited with as many wins as he could have been. Judging by his record, his innovation in the art of pitching, and his longevity, I think he should be in the Hall of Fame.

References:
http://www.baseballlibrary.com/baseballlibrary/ballplayers/M/Mathews_Bobby.stm
http://www.baseball-reference.com/m/mathebo01.shtml

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 2 of 2
 
 
Mo - Thanks. Today's pitchers try and reach 200 innings. Ha.

Posted on 10/05/2007 at 10:10:00 AM

 
Great catches! Particularly with Bobby Matthews, during the time he played when these guys would go and make 70-80 appearances a year, 3 more wins really isn't much of a stretch at all. Looks like 1878 and/or 1880 might've cost him a shot at history.

Posted on 10/05/2007 at 10:10:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 2 of 2
 
Most Commented On