Altercation at Planned Parenthood in San Antonio

Planned Parenthood Crosses the Line of Free Speech

By Carisa Silvesan, published Oct 06, 2007
Published Content: 129  Total Views: 46,943  Favorited By: 4 CPs
Rating: 3.0 of 5
October 5 was a big day for the 40 Days For Life campaign. The EWTN video crew was out taking videos and pictures while interviewing people. Over 75 people showed up to how what kind of support San Antonio has for their campaign, including one Jack M. Finger. During the day Father Will Combs gave a speech and, while trying to balance himself, Jack accidentally put a foot two inches on the Planned Parenthood parking lot. A volunteer escort security guard, wearing a Planned Parenthood smock, stood three to four feet away and saw Jack's toe on their property. Jack said the security guard made it quite clear that he was displeased with what Jack had done. Jack's response, after removing his foot, was, "so sue me."

The two men had a staring match and a few moments later a customer pulled into the Planned Parenthood parking lot. Jack offered a brochure containing information on the abortion facility and the customer walked over to retrieve it seeming somewhat interested in what it had to say. The security guard, upon seeing this, replied to the gesture with, "I don't want that trash." The man went on to shadow Jack as he made his way towards the customer, staying on the sidewalk, to hand her the information. Realizing that the security guard was going to continue to block Jack from handing the interested woman the information, the woman stated she would come back out after her appointment to get the brochure.

Seeing this action as a violation of his civil rights and the customer's right to choice, so fervently advocated by Planned Parenthood, Jack called the police. They showed up and told the security guard that Jack had every right to extend literature to the customer. As the security guard walked away, Jack stated to the officer, "I don't know why security is so upset." The police officer responded by saying, "it's probably because you're being so effective," regarding the 40 Days campaign.

Altercation at Planned Parenthood in San Antonio
Date: May 10, 2007
Location:
San Antonio, TX  USA

Peaceful, prayerful ... the sign reads, "A pregnant woman needs support, not an abortion."

Credit: Carisa Silvesan

Copyright: Carisa Silvesan

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
 
You can fool yourself. If you have a personal agenda there is no objectivity. For example, Jennifer Thompson, you are not looking at this from an objective view. An obvious pro-choicer, you are putting emphasis on the inconvenience of the Planned Parenthood folks rather then objectively stating that it is the right of Planned Parenthood to do what it does in our society, but it is the right of demonstrators to disagree and protest. Calling someone's views narrow are not a sign of objectivity, but instead arrogance and, more often then not, ignorance. Oh, but you'll just say that I'm being mean or ignoring the issues, or something else, and continue on your merry way. Well. You have fun doing that.

Posted on 11/04/2007 at 10:11:00 PM

 
Timothy - there is such a thing as objectivity in reporting. You CAN keep your personal agenda out of it - whether you have a personal agenda is irrelevant.

Posted on 10/18/2007 at 5:10:00 PM

 
A. Kairi, my sister is not objective, but neither is any news source in the world. Jennifer Thompson has an agenda, Karl Marx had an agenda, Paul the Apostle had an agenda, everyone has an agenda. I personally prefer when people are more obvious about it. That way perspective is given to the argument. Objectivity is impossible and those who decry that all must be objective are being naive or willfully ignorant.

Posted on 10/17/2007 at 10:10:00 AM

 
Carisa is not at all objective, A. Kairi. She has a tremendous agenda (notice her 8000 articles on her 40 day crusade???) and a narrow view, at that. Why shouldn't the security guard get frustrated? look at the nonsense planned parenthood has to put up with! How would you feel if some group of praying crazies sat on the lawn in front of your business for a month + of meddling? I'd be frustrated too! They AREN'T peaceful, they're a nusience.

Posted on 10/09/2007 at 11:10:00 AM

 
Excellent article, Carisa Silvesan! Reporting was plenty objective to me. Winning people over to your cause is best accomplished when news reporters are transparent about their opinions on the subject matter.

Posted on 10/08/2007 at 11:10:00 PM

 
sorry, but your article did not seem very objective. i symathize with your position, however news peices should always be objective without personal opinions interjected. you would have a lot better luck winning people to your cause if you were objective.

Posted on 10/07/2007 at 8:10:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
Most Commented On