Find » Technology » Science » Is a Gammagram in Your Future?

Is a Gammagram in Your Future?

Breast Specific Gamma Imaging Tests Are a New Tool to Help Detect Breast Cancer

By L. Lee Scott, published Oct 21, 2007
Published Content: 224  Total Views: 124,414  Favorited By: 51 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.8 of 5
One in every 30 women in the U.S will die of breast cancer. The reason is often because it is not detected early enough for treatment. Traditional mammograms don't always detect cancer, and some are simply inconclusive. If a woman has breast implants, scar tissue, or simply dense or fibrous breast tissue, a mammogram can be difficult to read, and radiologists can miss things. A relatively new technology, Breast Specific Gamma Imaging (BSGI), generally referred to as "gammagrams" by radiologists, gynecologists, and oncologists, can be used in these cases, and it saves lives.

BSGI works by taking images of the breast tissue's metabolic activity with a small amount of a radioactive tracer. Traditional mammograms, as well as MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) show pictures of breast density rather than metabolism. Cancer cells have higher metabolic rates than other cells, so they absorb significantly more of the tracer and show up as "hot spots" on the imaging.

Medcenter One in Bismarck is one of 50 sites in the nation that offers BSGI testing as of this writing, and the only site in North Dakota to offer it. Dr. Ted Fogarty, a radiologist at Medcenter One's Q&R clinic, says that gammagrams are so efficient that in the first year of use, doctors at Medcenter have diagnosed breast cancer at a rate that is three times the national rate for a similar practice using only mammogram screening. Gammagrams can find cancers as small as 3 mm, before they can be detected either by self-exams or by mammograms in dense breast tissue.

Takeaways
  • Mammograms, ultrasounds, and MRI tests look at tissue densities.
  • BSGI tests cell metabolism to pinpoint the higher metabolic rate of cancer cells.
  • BSGI can detect cancer earlier and also reduce false positives.
Comments
Comments 1 - 13 of 13
 
 
What a great medical advance. Super article.

Posted on 12/04/2007 at 2:12:00 PM

 
I had never heard of a gammagram before. Interesting.

Posted on 11/26/2007 at 9:11:00 PM

 
Great Article!

Posted on 11/15/2007 at 9:11:00 AM

 
Super article. I've never heard of this before either.

Posted on 10/28/2007 at 9:10:00 AM

 
Very informative. Thanks for sharing.

Posted on 10/27/2007 at 4:10:00 PM

 
Thank you for this information! Outstanding article.

Posted on 10/26/2007 at 11:10:00 PM

 
Great info! Thanks for sharing. I'm always worried about whether or not I need a mammogram, and I'm going to demand one this year (regardless of what their charts say the "age range" is supposed to be). If I'm old enough to suffer from fibrocystic breasts, I'm old enough for a mammogram. Poo on the rest.

Posted on 10/23/2007 at 11:10:00 AM

 
Great article about Gamagrams! I hadn't heard of them before reading your post. Wish they could come up with something better than a mammogram.

Posted on 10/22/2007 at 6:10:00 AM

 
Thank you for this valuable information.

Posted on 10/21/2007 at 7:10:00 PM

 
Wonderful article. TY for this valuable info.

Posted on 10/21/2007 at 4:10:00 PM

 
Thanks for the information. Great article!

Posted on 10/21/2007 at 2:10:00 PM

 
I had never heard of these. Thanks for the heads up!

Posted on 10/21/2007 at 1:10:00 PM

 
Interesting concepts these Gamagrams. Thank You fer sharin'. ;-}}>

Posted on 10/21/2007 at 1:10:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 13 of 13
 
Advertisment