When a Superpower Barks but Doesn't Bite

By Josh Greenberger, published Oct 11, 2007
Published Content: 43  Total Views: 6,157  Favorited By: 3 CPs
Rating: 3.5 of 5
Whoever coined the phrase "The more things change, the more they stay the same," couldn't have been thinking of modern warfare. When it comes to 21st Century military might, it seems, the more powerful a country gets, the less fear other countries have of it.

That two bombs can bring an end to a long war that had already killed 70 million people, may be a little hard to imagine. But when the U.S. dropped two atomic bombs (nicknamed "Little Boy" and "Fat Man") on Hiroshima (August 6, 1945) and Nagasaki (August 9, 1945), Japan surrendered in only 6 days. What's more, the shock of the bombs generated such strong public sentiments against nuclear weapons that Japan eventually adopted the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles;" The tenets state, "Japan shall neither possess nor manufacture nuclear weapons, nor shall it permit their introduction into Japanese territory."

It's unfortunate that it took an additional 100,000 deaths to end World War II. But with tens of millions already dead, it would not be an exaggeration to say that millions more might have died otherwise.

At that time, the U.S. had no nuclear stockpiles. We had tested our first nuclear weapon less than a month before the Japan bombings. The bombs were small, by today's standards; Hiroshima's approximately 15 kt, Nagasaki's approximately 21 kt. (1 kt [kiloton] has the explosive power of a thousand tons of dynamite.)

The U.S currently has over 9,000 nuclear warheads, of which almost 6,000 are fully active. Of these, over 400 are ballistic missiles with 475 kt warheads, each. To put it simply, we have enough explosive power to wipe every country off the face of the earth several times over.

There's little question that, weaponry wise, we've grown by leaps and bounds. But has our ability to fend off attacks or end a conflict with a strategic attack grown in the same proportion? That's questionable.

On October 7, 2001, American and British forces began aerial bombings of Afghanistan, named "Operation Enduring Freedom," targeting the Taliban and al-Qaeda. This was in response to, and almost a month after, 9/11.

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
 
Brett Davison is absolutely right. Psychology calls this "projection;" the tendency to ascribe to others feelings, thoughts, or attitudes present in oneself. Perhaps it's time for us to live up to some of their delusions and get a lot tougher.

Posted on 10/15/2007 at 10:10:00 AM

 
You half-way hit on it when you point to our hi-tech weapons that we are unwilling to lose. However, terrorism is just a tactic and until one can identify the enemy (Islam) by name we will keep on losing. We lack the resolve to take and inflict massive civilian loses. Currently, Muslims have the ideological edge in The Third Great Jihad. We cannot tech our way out of this problem. Read my interview that touches on this subject - http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/377693/an_interview_with_steve_klein_terrorist.html?page=2

Posted on 10/15/2007 at 10:10:00 AM

 
What most Europeans and Libetrals don't seem to get is that the very fact that we even tolerate their whining is evidence that we're not the bloodthirsty monsters that they are so eager to paint us as! I love this article!

Posted on 10/14/2007 at 4:10:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
Most Commented On