Mein Kampf: What Can Be Learned from the Words of Adolf Hitler

By Richard Carriero, published Oct 18, 2007
Published Content: 147  Total Views: 50,975  Favorited By: 24 CPs
Rating: 3.8 of 5
Monsters don't usually write autobiographies, not ones that are reasonably accurate anyway. Adolf Hitler did. Adolf Hitler dictated Mein Kampf to his friend and underling, Rudolf Hess while both men were incarcerated in Landsburg prison in 1924 for their role in leading a group of militant Nazis against a Bavarian minister's attempt to separate that region from the rest of Germany. The Nazis were ambushed by the army and Hitler was thrown in prison. In his introduction Hitler actually expresses gratitude that his incarceration gave him time to write his memoirs and political philosophies.

Mein Kampf is a highly unusual piece of writing: part bildungsroman, part philosophical/political treatise and part history. I have to confess; it is a good read. That is to say, it uses lucid and descriptive prose to tell its story. Much like Caesar's Commentaries, Mein Kampf focuses on fact and the bold statement of opinion with little room for flowery language. The tone is at times arrogant and martial while it can veer into the sentimental and even occasionally into self-mockery. I do not know whether or not Hitler spoke and Hess simply copied verbatim, but I would not be surprised if the text represents Hitler's actual words. He was a highly literate man, well versed in history, politics and German philosophy. Hitler was also a superb and experienced public speaker, so his mental faculties for organizing his thoughts, drawing analogies and formulating arguments was probably highly developed.

Cover from Mein Kampf's first edition.

Credit: Houghton Mifflin

Copyright: Bavarian Government

Takeaways
  • Through his observations of the Austrian Parliament, Hitler formed the worst opinions of democracy.
  • As a writer Hitler was highly organized and eloquent but his logic suffers from several flaws,
  • Reading Mein Kampf helps foster understand of how a person could become a genocidal monster.
Did You Know?
Hitler failed to pay the taxes on the royalties from Mein Kampf. He waived his tax bill when he became Chancellor of Germany.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 7 of 7
 
 
I hope a few politicians get a hold of this statement: "The next time a congressman finesses a pet bill through the House rewarding one of his cronies with a government contract, perhaps he should scan the audience for angry young men watching in disgust." America is filled with disillusioned people looking for a savior. Your caution is well warranted.

Posted on 12/29/2007 at 6:12:59 PM

 
Hi Monique, thanks for the comment. That is exactly why I read it. Like a psych profile of a pathological killer. Few such records exist.

Posted on 11/17/2007 at 6:11:00 AM

 
I bought Mein Kampf for the sole reason of learning what makes a man a monster.

Posted on 11/17/2007 at 5:11:00 AM

 
I recently purchased a copy of Mein Kampf from Barnes and Nobles. I was quite surprised when I found it. I'm going to come back and read this review after I've finished the book.

Posted on 11/17/2007 at 4:11:00 AM

 
A great review. Now I won't even need to read the book. Richard, I think you have a great heart anyway.

Posted on 11/01/2007 at 10:11:00 AM

 
sociations which any society wishing to prolong itself into perpetuity must contain in order to survive. As long as man has any preconceived notions of what he is supposed to be or become he will never be open to other possibilities and "progress" will thus become impossible. Perhaps progress should not even be the goal as once freedom is acheived progress will be acheived as well.

Posted on 10/29/2007 at 1:10:00 PM

 
The problem with the fascists and the communists is the same problem plaguing many conservative "thinkers" like Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Ann Coulter today - they all mistake rationalizations for reasons and engage more in outward reflection and criticism and marginalization of conflicting and competing ideas as a means of deflecting inner reflection and introspection. The real solution to all of this is to find a basic starting point as the basis of all human societies and that basis must be "deontological" - in other words it cannot contain within it any preconceived notions of what man is supposed to "be". The politically and scholastically correct term for liberals now is not progressives (which let's face it people is just a tad arrogant and presumptuous) or even liberals (with all the correct implications this has for human freedom) but deontologists with all the implications for laissez-faire freedom in economics, government, and familial and personal relationships and as

Posted on 10/29/2007 at 1:10:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 7 of 7
 
Most Commented On