Animal Research and Accountability
We Need Both
Just knowing that the APA has set forth rules stating "painful or harmful procedures imposed must not only be considered justified, but expected outcomes must be clear from the start." This makes me more confident that animals won't be tortured unnecessarily during trial and error experiments where a "mad scientist" is hoping to gain ideas to explore. There are detailed rules about animal care and housing conditions that ensure that the animals are more comfortable and not neglected.
I hope that animal research continues to advance medical findings until such a time comes when another alternative is viable. It is also my hope that animal rights activists continue to crusade the rights of the animals and the responsibilities of the researchers to ensure the proper treatment of the animals. If this sounds contradictory, it is only because I do believe humans by nature need to be held accountable, and without the animal rights activists the researchers would not continuously adhere to treating the animals humanely all of the time. I don't mean the researchers intend to mistreat the animals, I think their desire to succeed and prosper would outweigh the intent to keep the animals well being in sight.
You may also like...
- How to Win the Nobel Prize
- Two Americans, Andrew Z. Fire and Craig C. Mello are Awarded Nobel Prize in Medicine / Physiology
- American Biochemist Awarded 2006 Nobel Prize for Chemistry
- Two Americans Get Nobel Prize in Physics
- Ten Nobel Prize Winners to Read This Summer
- Nobel Prize Winner Won More Than a Prize
- Alternatives to Animal Research (Vivisection)
- Biography of David Kahneman, 2002 Winner of the Nobel Prize in Economics
- Should Animal Research in Psychology be Eliminated?
- Background on the 2007 Nobel Prize Winners in Economics
Did You Know?
A huge majority of the nobel prize winners for medical discoverys involved animals.
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Most Commented On



