Find » Opinion/Editorial » Dumbeldor is Gay, so What?!?!?

Dumbeldor is Gay, so What?!?!?

By Tiffany Ranae Widdifield, published Oct 20, 2007
Published Content: 70  Total Views: 30,560  Favorited By: 1 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.0 of 5
With the recent outing of Professor Dumbeldore, by author J.K. Rowling, I was shocked that for once, the author of a fiction brand was the first on the scene to out one of her characters for being homosexual, rather than the Family Research Council Run by Focus on the Family's James Dobson, sinking their eager teeth in. it seems the Council was asleep at the wheel. To be fair though, the Christian Right has for quite some time denounced the Harry Potter Series for it's use of witchcraft, (and to be fair, anyone who can make a billion bucks for fantasy stories is a bit suspect) and the obvious signs of homosexuality were completely overlooked. Let's remember, the last time we saw a wrinkly old man prancing around in a silk kimono, instructing young boys in the way they should go, he had seven plastic girlfriends and lived at the Playboy mansion.

Still though, the biggest thing about the outing of Professor Dumbledore that stands out to me is this undeniable apathy that can best be summed up in the following two words:

SO WHAT!

Yes! Apparently Professor Dumbeldore is just like 8-10% of the human population. For fun, I checked into what other kinds of things were common at the same rate among humans. For example: One in ten people will suffer an ulcer in their lifetime. One in ten will also suffer some sort of extreme phobia in their lifetime (homophobia?) One in ten people is bi-polar. Can you imagine the uproar if, for example Hermione turned out to be bi-polar? It would put the "And???" in "Scandalous"! My point is that the prevalence of outed homosexuality in our entertainment doesn't come anywhere near the prevalence of homosexuality in humans, or even in mammals as a whole. It's simply no big deal. The only thing that is in the slightest bit disturbing about Author Rowling's revelation of the professor's sexual preference is that in her revelation she completely failed to answer the question presented to her by the fan that prompted that revelation.

Comments
Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
 
i agree. It didn't affect the story or the outcome and if it did it should have been written in the book. Saying that the character was gay like it was a side note seemed to be a major publicity stunt to me. It wasn't necessary to mention.

Posted on 10/23/2007 at 9:10:00 AM

 
Pretty simply, as an author, I know alot about my characters and their history that I dont put in my books. At some point in the drafts, they are there, but writing is rewriting. It's also cutting out things that distract from the tale. As to selling more books, let's be real. She will sell LESS books because religious people will stop buying them. Look for a book burning soon at a church parking lot near you!

Posted on 10/22/2007 at 11:10:00 AM

 
I have a problem with this. Why did she wait? Was it her intention all along that Dumbledore was gay? I think it is a complete stunt to sell more books. But so what? Let's fatten her wallet a little more. I wrote a piece on this as well. None of the teachers at Hogwarts was in a relationship that we know of and they all lived there. The only potential relationship was between Hagrid and what's her name from the other school. I think that Dumbledore being gay was a non-issue in the book and should have just been left that way. Making it an afterthought is just going to confuse the young readers that have read the series. If Dumbledore was gay and did have that true love with his friend, then why did she not put it in the book?

Posted on 10/22/2007 at 12:10:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
Advertisment