Jet Boats vs. Prop Driven Boats for Skiers and Wake Boarders

By Lucky M. Diaz, published Oct 30, 2007
Published Content: 40  Total Views: 15,426  Favorited By: 55 CPs
Rating: 4.6 of 5
The boating world is being taken by a new craze: Jet Boats. Consumers are buying more Jet Boats now without hesitation than ever. It seems that a need for speed is fueling this craze; but will this craze soon become a short-lived trend as soon as people realize what exactly it is they've bought? Skiers and Wake-boarders will likely be the first to realize the big Pro's and Con's of owning a Jet Boat.

The advantages of owning a Jet Boat are obvious: Faster, sleeker, sexier, and a hell of a lot easier to get in and out of the Marina and/or shore. Anyone who has ever had to take their Prop-driven boat in and out of the water knows that it can be a pain in the ass to do. With a prop the driver of the boat must always be aware of the water level and anything that might be floating around in the water. When towing a skier or wake boarder the driver must always be aware of where the tow line is because running over it could cause the line to become wrapped up in the propeller. Ski boat drivers don't have to worry about where the tow line is with a Jet Boat because there is no propeller. Also, don't forget that a Prop is a large, fairly heavy and sharp object that hurts like hell to hit any part of your body on(especially your knees). This is an obvious Con of owning a Prop-driven boat that just about everybody who has owned one has had the misfortune of experiencing. For Skiers and Wake-boarders the water is definitely easier and safer to jump into without a prop, but is it any more fun? Well, Jet Boats are definitely faster than Prop-driven boats. So, if more speed means more fun then Jet Boat owners are in for the time of their lives. However, as a Skier, I know that there is more to skiing than speed.

Jet Boats vs. Prop Driven Boats for Skiers and Wake Boarders

A Jet Boat that was quickly sold by it's owner and replaced by a Prop-driven boat.

Credit: Ivan Diaz

Copyright: Ivan Diaz

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 10 of 10
 
 
i agree with shanelle diaz on jets quicker props faster which it requires more hp to turn a jet than a prop

Posted on 05/07/2008 at 4:05:07 PM

 
i disagree on cost of maintanence on the older jetboats maybe the new seadoos or whatever and fuel econamy its all in the throttle i can last on the river all day

Posted on 05/07/2008 at 4:05:39 PM

 
If you would have read the comment that I put here before YOU, Alan Green, put your fat foot in your mouth. . .you wouldn't have even made the comment. But that's O.K., no big deal. To the jet boat fans out there: keep your jets, I'll pick the prop every time!

Posted on 04/23/2008 at 3:04:02 PM

 
This is a classic case of an uninformed individual spewing forth. Everything she pointed out about a jet boat is NOT True. Why don't you research before putting your foot in your mouth?

Posted on 04/10/2008 at 12:04:39 PM

 
This article is comparing old style performance jet boats to current runabouts. Time to get with the times and look at the new jet boats being sold by Sea Doo and Yamaha! The bow rise on these new jets is LESS than an I/O! Why? Well it is simple physics, the jet nozzles on new bowrider jet boats are close to flush with the stern which means the jets push the boat from the stern, vs from below the stern (which is what causes the bow rise on an I/O). The Yamaha line of jet boats is actually MORE fuel efficient that most comparable I/O's. In fact, it took me a while looking at test results on boattest.com to find an I/O that was more efficient that the new Yamaha 230 Series! The new jet boats are faster out of the hole than an I/O, but not faster on top end speed. You can thottle up as much as you like....skiing or wakeboarding behind them is no problem! I really can't find much if anything accurate in this article! Even the comment about I/O's having to worry about ski lines wh

Posted on 03/24/2008 at 3:03:13 PM

 
This is another very intersesting article. If they could find a better way to keep sand out of the jet boat's intake, they are the clear choice for shallow or stumpy water. Each type of propulsion has its pros and cons for sure, but I'd probably stick with the prop myself, if only because I have the knowledge to fix them when they tear up. Great job!

Posted on 02/29/2008 at 2:02:07 PM

 
I've seen it all before. Jet boats are in, jets are out, then they're in, then they're out. Jets will pump sand, if the water level is low enough. The deal with the bow is put some weight up there, and nose will drop faster, same as for a prop getting on plane. Same old, same old

Posted on 02/11/2008 at 3:02:55 PM

 
Thanks for the different perspective, Shanelle!

Posted on 11/06/2007 at 8:11:00 PM

 
I have been informed recently that a Jet boat can sometimes be cheaper to fix. Also, that although Jet boats often take-off faster, a Prop-driven boat can have a higher top speed. I thought it is only fair that I add this information here with this article.

Posted on 11/04/2007 at 10:11:00 AM

 
Great report and very interesting.

Posted on 10/30/2007 at 4:10:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 10 of 10
 
Most Commented On