Hillary Clinton's Defense of Iran Vote Criticized
New York Senator and presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has sent a mailing to Iowa voters in defense of her senate vote on the Kyl-Lieberman amendment regarding
United States of AmericaIran, which defined part of Iran's military as a "terrorist organization." Fellow presidential candidate John Edwards' campaign has criticized her defense of the vote.
According to a press release issued by the John Edwards For President campaign on Sunday, Edwards' campaign manager released a statement regarding Senator Clinton's mailing. The statement pointed out that her explanation to Iowa voters was not the same as her campaign's explanation to the New York Times. It indicated that Clinton backers told the Times that the reason for her vote was about changing from campaigning for the nomination to campaigning for the general election. The statement also expressed the belief that there have been "devastating consequences" in Iraq and that the Bush administration appears to be preparing for war with Iran.
The U.S. Senate web site indicates that seventy six senators voted in favor of the anti-Iran amendment, while twenty two voted against it. Two, including presidential candidates Barack Obama and John McCain, were not present to vote on it. Candidates Biden and Dodd, among other senators, voted in opposition to the amendment.
On September 26th, Senator Clinton issued a statement regarding her support for the Kyl-Lieberman amendment. She referred to Iran's nuclear program and "substantial links" with Lebanon's Hezbollah organization. She went on to claim that the amendment would not authorize military action against Iran, instead intending to put "diplomatic pressure" on the Central Asian nation. Her statement also accused Iran of "mismanaging" its economy and repressing its citizens.
Hillary Clinton's Defense of Iran Vote Criticized
Date: October 21, 2007Chapel Hill, NCUnited States of America
According to a press release issued by the John Edwards For President campaign on Sunday, Edwards' campaign manager released a statement regarding Senator Clinton's mailing. The statement pointed out that her explanation to Iowa voters was not the same as her campaign's explanation to the New York Times. It indicated that Clinton backers told the Times that the reason for her vote was about changing from campaigning for the nomination to campaigning for the general election. The statement also expressed the belief that there have been "devastating consequences" in Iraq and that the Bush administration appears to be preparing for war with Iran.
The U.S. Senate web site indicates that seventy six senators voted in favor of the anti-Iran amendment, while twenty two voted against it. Two, including presidential candidates Barack Obama and John McCain, were not present to vote on it. Candidates Biden and Dodd, among other senators, voted in opposition to the amendment.
On September 26th, Senator Clinton issued a statement regarding her support for the Kyl-Lieberman amendment. She referred to Iran's nuclear program and "substantial links" with Lebanon's Hezbollah organization. She went on to claim that the amendment would not authorize military action against Iran, instead intending to put "diplomatic pressure" on the Central Asian nation. Her statement also accused Iran of "mismanaging" its economy and repressing its citizens.
Most Comments Today
- Cyber Attack Aftermath: Perplexed AC Exec Asks, "Why Us?" It's easy to guess why cyber attackers went after the White House and the Pen... 26 Comments
- Frogg Toggs Chilly Pad: Product Review Use the Frogg Toggs Chilly Pad to stay cool this summer. Designed to keep yo... 25 Comments
- Easy Napkin Folding Techniques Find easy napkin folding techniques that anyone can do. Butterfly fold, Bis... 24 Comments
- Michael Jackson is Missing The casket is missing, where is it? How did it disappear? 24 Comments
- Oh No! Michael Jackson's Body and Brain Missing Is Michael Jackson's body and brain missing? According to many websites they... 24 Comments
- Sarah Palin 2012? Sarah Palin 2012? 23 Comments






