The President Doesn't Abandon SCHIP

Monday, October 21, 2007

There are children that qualify for Medicaid and those that receive health care from their parents insurance plans, typically in conjunction with their employment. There are poor American children that fall in between this gap and receive no
 health insurance. The State Children's Health Insurance Plan(SCHIP) was to bridge that gap.

In 1997 the Republican Congress enacted SCHIP as the largest expansion to health care since the 60's. This health plan was designed to reach those that earned too much to qualify for Medicaid and those that were unable to afford private insurance. Ten years down the line today's Democratic Congress was in charge of extending and continuing this coverage for the children. What we saw instead was political wrangling of an unprecedented magnitude. The House Speaker, the third highest ranking governmental official in the land, Nancy Pelosi makes the claim that her Congress passed a bipartisan bill before it was sent to the President's desk. I'll start there. A few Republicans signed onto the bill, true, but that didn't make it a bipartisan effort. If the Legislative Branch keyed the Executive Branch in during the draft as per request then a bipartisan bill may have been possible. President Bush forewarned Congress that a veto would be forthcoming if the bill was not designed according to its intended purpose.

On October, 03rd A forwarded bill not adhering to SCHIP's original mandate looked something like this: An inclusion of hundreds of thousands of adults, folks, that should ring some bells right there. Hey, it's all in the title of Children's Health Insurance. This bill also included upper income children already covered under private plans. Families in some states, specifically NY, earning upwards of 83,000 dollars per annum would have been allowed to continue to solicit for inclusion. I know, ridiculous to say the least. President Bush vetoed the measure as warned.

 
Comments 1 - 7 of 7  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

:-)

Posted on 12/17/2008 at 11:12:29 AM

Your articles are always informative. This one is no exception.

Posted on 02/04/2008 at 12:02:51 PM

Interesting article. I'll have to second what Donna said about this

Posted on 12/30/2007 at 9:12:23 PM

Yes, Donna, things are pretty bleak. But knowledge is power & if we continue to have Americans, like you, with a non-partisan view and education-we will continue to make great strides in this nation.

Posted on 12/30/2007 at 7:12:54 PM

This is very interesting Tony and some good points made. Though, I see the Left and Right about equally culpable in the healthcare mess we're in. I just added a rant on my own article about some of the problems I think need to be fixed (biotech price gouging, universities in bed with business and no incentives for research, and insurance lobbyists.). Both the poor and the real middle class are suffering and government has done a good job at placing the blame on both, or on smokers, or on the war etc. etc. Problems could be solved without socialized medicine, but the question remains if we or the elite are willing to make the needed changes. Things look rather grim, don't they?

Posted on 12/30/2007 at 7:12:17 PM

Thank you Clark, you sound like a great American. This country is increasingly becoming devoid of men like you, someone with an apparent strong work ethic, and a grasp of how important it is to ensure the success of their children. I am looking forward to reading your content.

Posted on 10/26/2007 at 10:10:00 AM

Great article Tony! Why doesn't the rest of America get it? Sadly, the Democrats are in fact about tax and spend. What's so sad about the issues is that I will personally benefit if Democrats come to power as I am in the lower income bracket. However, I have been independent all my life - raised two children with health insurance - paid their college tuition - am retired and can live just fine without a handout. I don't need to take other people's money.

Posted on 10/26/2007 at 8:10:00 AM

Comments 1 - 7 of 7