What is Ockham's Razor?
Ockham's razor (or Occam's razor, Achem's razor) is the argument that in order to understand something, we shouldn't invent elaborate explanations that use useless information. The Galilean library gives the crop circles phenomenon as an example, explaining that a popular belief is that
crop circles are caused by aliens, usually with their aircraft, while others believe that they are the work of guerilla artists or those making the circles an elaborate hoax. Ockham's razor would argue that since it can't be proved that aliens cause the crop circles, they shouldn't be used as a part of the explanation for them. As the Galilean library states, "we should pick the simpler explanation", especially since people have been able to reconstruct the crop circles. (1)
A page on University of California, Riverside's website by Jose Wudka explains that while Ockham's razor can be simplified as "keep it simple", it is a more complex and effective argument. The page states that if there are two possible explanations for something, experimenting should prove which explanation is better, and if they both reach the same conclusion, opt for the one that doesn't have "additional baggage". (2) If you left a plate of cookies on the living room table, then return to find most of them gone, you could obviously conclude that someone ate them, but if you conclude that it was either the work of your roommate or leprechauns, you're better off asking your roommate if he helped himself to the treats. Unless you see leprechauns wandering around your home, there's no reason to think the Irish creatures helped themselves to the cookies.
A page on University of California, Riverside's website by Jose Wudka explains that while Ockham's razor can be simplified as "keep it simple", it is a more complex and effective argument. The page states that if there are two possible explanations for something, experimenting should prove which explanation is better, and if they both reach the same conclusion, opt for the one that doesn't have "additional baggage". (2) If you left a plate of cookies on the living room table, then return to find most of them gone, you could obviously conclude that someone ate them, but if you conclude that it was either the work of your roommate or leprechauns, you're better off asking your roommate if he helped himself to the treats. Unless you see leprechauns wandering around your home, there's no reason to think the Irish creatures helped themselves to the cookies.
Related information
Most Comments Today
- Cyber Attack Aftermath: Perplexed AC Exec Asks, "Why Us?" It's easy to guess why cyber attackers went after the White House and the Pen... 26 Comments
- Frogg Toggs Chilly Pad: Product Review Use the Frogg Toggs Chilly Pad to stay cool this summer. Designed to keep yo... 25 Comments
- Easy Napkin Folding Techniques Find easy napkin folding techniques that anyone can do. Butterfly fold, Bis... 24 Comments
- Michael Jackson is Missing The casket is missing, where is it? How did it disappear? 24 Comments
- Oh No! Michael Jackson's Body and Brain Missing Is Michael Jackson's body and brain missing? According to many websites they... 24 Comments
- Sarah Palin 2012? Sarah Palin 2012? 23 Comments






Charlotte Kuchinsky
Posted on 11/03/2007 at 5:11:00 PM