Reasonable Political Discourse - Lost in the Haze of Shallow Thinking

A Look at "Kool-Aid" and a Hope of Finding "Common Ground"

By Jim Stillman, published Oct 30, 2007
Published Content: 149  Total Views: 75,810  Favorited By: 45 CPs
Rating: 4.6 of 5
Years ago, while employed by the state of Florida, Joan and I decided that we could use some extra income; I began work for the Tampa Tribune. I remember one person to whom I had called saying, "The Tribune? Isn't that the Commie paper?" I answered, much to the discomfort of my supervisor, "No, that's the St. Petersburg Times. We're the fascist one."

That was, no doubt, a rather harsh and simplistic analysis, but the fact remains that of the two major newspapers serving the Tampa bay area, the Tribune is far more conservative and GOP oriented. I rarely agree with the Tribune's editorials but that published on October 26, 2007, was right on point.

A damaging phrase has crept into our political vocabulary and pushed the level of our public discourse a little lower.

People accused of blindly following a doctrine or leader without thinking for themselves increasingly are being called Kool-Aid drinkers.

The image gives a colorful edge to an otherwise bland opinion, but it has another purpose. It's a slur that demonizes those to whom it is applied, which can be anyone, including members of Congress and even the president.

Republicans are using it to describe Democrats, and vice versa, but the parties never use it to describe their own most faithful supporters.

The image comes from the Jim Jones massacre in Guyana in 1978. Cult leader Jones ordered his followers to kill themselves by drinking a poisoned grape-flavored beverage. They did and 913 died.

The American political scene has its share of partisan loyalists, but to say they are suicidally brainwashed is absurd.

If you assume the reason folks don't agree with you is because they can't think for themselves, their opposition becomes less a democratic obstacle to be overcome than a malevolent force to be defeated.

If your opponent is a Kool-Aid drinker, you're wasting your time to be polite, empathize with his position or attempt to compromise..

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
 
Mr. Vinistra, I hope you see the irony in blaming the Conservative Republicans. Seems like a comment such as that one serves only to divide more - widen the gap, as some might say. I'm sure a staunch supporter of the Republican party could list off examples of Democratic labeling and dismissing. I hope you can now appreciate the difficulty in reuniting (somewhat) the two parties, when each feels that the other is to blame.

Posted on 11/24/2007 at 9:11:00 PM

 
redit for doing anything right? As longas conservatives have anything tosay about it the answer is - never.

Posted on 11/08/2007 at 8:11:00 AM

 
The trouble with trying to find common ground with conservative Republicans when you're a liberal Democrat is that Democrats have been doing that for years now and we never get the least amount of credit when we do it. Bill Clinton rubber stamped much of the agenda of Newt Gingrich's Contract for (on) America and as payback he got Ken Starr's unreal witchhunt and an impeachment hearing. John Kerry voted for the War in Iraq, No Child Left Behind and Faith - Based Initiatives and as payback he got swiftboated out of a presidential victory. Al Gore's been out front on global warming for 30 years and as payback he gets labeled a nutjob. Gore was also on the forefront of promoting legislation to lay down fiberoptic cables through all 50 states, all counties,cities, municipalities, rural and mountainous areas of the nation to create equal access to an "internet" and for saying he did what he in fact did do he gets labeled a supercilious weasel. When may I ask are liberals ever going to get c

Posted on 11/08/2007 at 8:11:00 AM

 
The trouble with trying to find common ground with conservative Republicans when you're a liberal Democrat is that Democrats have been doing that for years now and we never get the least amount of credit when we do it. Bill Clinton rubber stamped much of the agenda of Newt Gingrich's Contract for (on) America and as payback he got Ken Starr's unreal witchhunt and an impeachment hearing. John Kerry voted for the War in Iraq, No Child Left Behind and Faith - Based Initiatives and as payback he got swiftboated out of a presidential victory. Al Gore's been out front on global warming for 30 years and as payback he gets labeled a nutjob. Gore was also on the forefront of promoting legislation to lay down fiberoptic cables through all 50 states, all counties,cities, municipalities, rural and mountainous areas of the nation to create equal access to an "internet" and for saying he did what he in fact did do he gets labeled a supercilious weasel. When may I ask are liberals ever going to get c

Posted on 11/08/2007 at 8:11:00 AM

 
I dislike the party politics of "voting down the party line". Why represent your constituents if you cannot think for yourself? Hang on, I am too shallow for that....now, where did I leave my cool-aid?

Posted on 10/30/2007 at 5:10:00 PM

 
Insightful. I would LOVE to see a politician publicly give credit for an idea to the other party without making any effort to claim credit in some way. Political discourse should be about finding the best ideas and tweaking the good ones to make them better and working together to implement them. We all get shortchanged when Congress or other public institutions become a ideological battleground and when winning and getting credit becomes the object.

Posted on 10/30/2007 at 4:10:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
Most Commented On