'Dump Soda' Global Campaign Goes After 'Liquid Candy'

Sugar-heavy sodas are contributing to a global rise in childhood obesity, and should no longer be marketed to children under 16, according to a new international campaign to "Dump Soda."

Led by the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) and the International Association of Consumer Food Organizations, the Dump Soda campaign says we need to reduce our consumption of high-calorie sodas and other drinks to improve health and
'Dump Soda' Global Campaign Goes After 'Liquid Candy'
diet around the globe. The campaign is calling for governments to restrict soda advertising to children, ban the sale of sodas and other sweetened drinks in schools and impose a value-added tax on soft drinks to generate funds for nutrition and exercise programs and subsidies for fresh produce.

Dump Soda leaders are also seeking to eliminate corporate logos and other marketing for programs promoting exercise and healthy habits. Rather than using direct corporate sponsorship, such programs should be funded by blind trusts overseen by government agencies, they say.

The coalition is aiming its message especially at big-name soft-drink companies that it says are "aggressively targeting" consumers in developing countries as soda sales in the U.S. and Europe decline.

"Multinational giants like Coca-Cola and PepsiCo are flooding the world with beverages that are nothing more than liquid candy," said Bruce Silverglade, legal director for the CSPI. "As a result, consumers, including children, in all corners of the globe are increasingly developing obesity, type-2 diabetes and other health problems."

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), some 1.6 billion people ages 15 and up were overweight in 2005. In that same year, at least 20 million children under the age of 5 were also overweight.

Related information
  • Center for Science in the Public Interest at cspinet.org
 
Comments 1 - 10 of 17 Next >>
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

A new proposed tax is in process, and will have a far more negative than positive impact on the economy-a sugar tax. Sugar tax would be placed on food and beverages, which contains high sugar, soda, Gatorade and things of the same nature might include. Several stated have tried passing the said tax but it hasn't been very popular, as the as the national habit for sugary drinks is well documented and attributed as playing a part in the national obesity rates. The idea of payday loans to feed the Pepsi habit isn't something people are thrilled about, and earlier attempts to pass similar measures haven't met with success. Nobody wants to need debt relief for a can of Coke thanks to a sugar tax. Learn more here: http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2009/05/12/sugar-tax-senate-leaders-taxing-soft-drinks/

Posted on 05/19/2009 at 2:05:18 AM

These new proposed tax in process would have a far more negative than positive impact on the economy-a sugar tax. Sugar tax would be placed on food and beverages, which contains high sugar, soda, Gatorade and things of the same nature might include. It poses a grave threat to the sugar industry and other allied industries. The group said demand for soft drinks was highly price elastic. This means that an increase in price could lead to substantial drop in the volume of consumption. The adverse consequences of this could be enormous, the group said, because there were various industries that were dependent on how the soft drinks business was doing. Allied industries include sugar, packaging, retail, logistics, distribution, advertising and marketing. Several stated have tried passing the said tax but it hasn't been very popular, as the as the national habit for sugary drinks is well documented and attributed as playing a part in the national obesity rates. The idea of payday loans to fe

Posted on 05/19/2009 at 2:05:59 AM

The real problem is people your self included lack of responcablity and teaching it, it is not for you or anyone else to control eveybody else on what they eat, drink, buy, or how they live. Signed: U.S. Army Veteran

Posted on 01/14/2008 at 1:01:18 PM

Okay so is everything in the world that we eat if some jerk like you thinks it is un-healthy you want it banned or outlawed if your not happy with the way people live in the United States the get out you do not pay my bill or my salery or pay for my food or my doctor so butt out move to Canada or the UK or better yet you should fit good in China. Sighned: U.S. Army Veteran

Posted on 01/14/2008 at 1:01:43 PM

So thats their business unless you pay their bill and for their gas and auto and food it is none of your business.

Posted on 01/14/2008 at 1:01:12 PM

Soft drinks are the original junk food - their contribution to our nutritional needs is entirely negative, unless you count the water content! It's time the health risks of drinking these chemical cocktails were explored and exposed. Yes, of course they do no harm to most people consumed in small amounts - but that doesn't chime with company profits.

Posted on 11/19/2007 at 10:11:00 AM

I don't know if soda can be blamed for obesity, but the artificial sweeteners are the real problem, I think. Thanks for the info. I am glad I have cut back my soda drinking to almost nothing.

Posted on 11/12/2007 at 9:11:00 AM

I live in Missouri where some people are so uninformed it's frightening. I see people drinking 44oz. sodas all the time. That's 600 calories and 144 grams of sugar. Most nutritionist recommend no more than 40 grams!

Posted on 11/08/2007 at 3:11:00 PM

I rarely drink soda. I don't like the empty calories.

Posted on 11/06/2007 at 8:11:00 PM

This is a good article...very well written. I know soda is bad...when I stopped drinking it (diet included) I lost 80 lbs (along with exercise and eating healthy overall). But if you think about it...sodas contain on average 150 calories per can. If you drink three or four a day, that's one meal's worth of calories!

Posted on 11/05/2007 at 2:11:00 PM

Comments 1 - 10 of 17 Next >>