SEO is Nothing New
Search Engine Optimization is nothing new. Long before the internet came around people searched for information manually, and the people who provided that information had to find a way to get their information to the top of the list.
There has been a lot of debate about "writing for SEO", and whether it is
appropriate.
Consider the newspaper stand of old. Two papers sit on stacks, face up. One headline reads "Police raid illegal distillery-4 arrested". The other reads "Cops knock down gin mill-Cash and Guns seized".
Which paper is more likely to grab your attention?
Now read the story lead.
Imagine that the first newspaper leads with something like "Inspector John Smith confirms that a home-based distillery was entered early this morning following an anonymous tip..." and the second reads "Heavily armed cops broke down the doors of a massive illegal gin mill in a pre-dawn raid this morning..."
Which article would you most likely read first?
Even though the second example is considered by many to be "tabloid" writing, it has been popular with readers, who use headlines and story leads to guide their reading, for many years. People who prefer (or write for) newspapers that fall into the first example will tell you that our second example is trashy, second rate journalism. But it gets read and, if the information within the body of the story is substantially the same as in its competitor's version, it has value.
Publishers of old learned how people "searched" for information, even when it was printed on paper, and they went out of their way to guide their readers to the stories that they wanted them to read. Perhaps not surprisingly, the stories with the best headlines and strongest leads were positioned next to the newspaper's highest paying ad space. In this regard, the "new" media is no different than the "old" media.
SEO is really just the age-old practice of writing a compelling headline and a strong lead. But now, computers allow us to scan millions of sources simultaneously, and filter out the headlines that are irrelevant.
There has been a lot of debate about "writing for SEO", and whether it is
Consider the newspaper stand of old. Two papers sit on stacks, face up. One headline reads "Police raid illegal distillery-4 arrested". The other reads "Cops knock down gin mill-Cash and Guns seized".
Which paper is more likely to grab your attention?
Now read the story lead.
Imagine that the first newspaper leads with something like "Inspector John Smith confirms that a home-based distillery was entered early this morning following an anonymous tip..." and the second reads "Heavily armed cops broke down the doors of a massive illegal gin mill in a pre-dawn raid this morning..."
Which article would you most likely read first?
Even though the second example is considered by many to be "tabloid" writing, it has been popular with readers, who use headlines and story leads to guide their reading, for many years. People who prefer (or write for) newspapers that fall into the first example will tell you that our second example is trashy, second rate journalism. But it gets read and, if the information within the body of the story is substantially the same as in its competitor's version, it has value.
Publishers of old learned how people "searched" for information, even when it was printed on paper, and they went out of their way to guide their readers to the stories that they wanted them to read. Perhaps not surprisingly, the stories with the best headlines and strongest leads were positioned next to the newspaper's highest paying ad space. In this regard, the "new" media is no different than the "old" media.
SEO is really just the age-old practice of writing a compelling headline and a strong lead. But now, computers allow us to scan millions of sources simultaneously, and filter out the headlines that are irrelevant.
Related information
Most Comments Today
- Death at Disney World in Orlando, Florida Monorails collide one driver has died at the Disney World Theme Park in Orlan... 29 Comments
- A Little Good News Today Here is...a little good news today. 25 Comments
- Why Would a Web Writer Drop DayLife.Com? Before I share my story with you, dear readers, I want to point out that Dayl... 24 Comments
- Give a Damn Another new song, this one describes the feelings of us who save the world ev... 17 Comments
- Hair and Make-Up Tips from Nancy Looking good is as easy. Looking stunningly beautiful is an art. 16 Comments
- Bachelorette 5 Spoiler: Wes Hayden Spills the Beans About... This week July 6, 2009 episode 8 of the Bachelorette Jillian will finally d... 16 Comments




