The Genealogies of Jesus - Contradictory or Complementary?

By Nick Poma, published Oct 30, 2007
Published Content: 278  Total Views: 91,859  Favorited By: 43 CPs
Rating: 4.8 of 5
* Introduction

I have heard some people make mention of the fact that Jesus seems to have two genealogies, which are mentioned in two of the books of the Gospels. These individuals declare that the genealogies are different; therefore, there must be a contradiction. As a Christian I really have no issue with this, however, some will grab on to anything which appears to be a contradiction in order to disprove the accuracy of the Bible.

Now, apparently I have not made it clear enough that I do not consider myself to be a scholar of any sort, and in matters of the Bible, even I am still learning. Nevertheless, I can read and understand the principles and ideals held within the Bible, and I do welcome the challenges presented to me because it only serves to make me seek out the answers that I have not really considered or, concerned myself with.

* Establishing the Genealogy of Jesus through Joseph

In the book of Mathew, the writer is establishing a genealogy, which starts at Abraham, and covers the generations to Jesus, who is Christ. This genealogy establishes the validity of the ancestry of Jesus through Joseph, the husband of Mary. So, if Jesus was born to a virgin, why should we be concerned with the genealogy of Joseph at all?

How can we count Joseph's genealogy as Jesus' if he were not even really his father? In Jewish tradition, if a man adopts a child as his own, then that child is the offspring of that man as if he was born to him, and is afforded all of the endowments of the father.

In prophecies concerning the arrival of the Messiah, he had to be descended from a particular line. Abraham was told that it was his seed through which the nations of the world would be blessed. As a matter of clarification, in the Bible, "Nations" is a term often attributed to peoples and not necessarily a particular government, or race.

The writer in Mathew is simply establishing the lineage of Jesus from the perspective of Joseph's genealogy back to the time of Abraham, which would fulfill the promise that God had made to Abraham.

* Establishing the Genealogy of Jesus through Mary

The Genealogies of Jesus - Contradictory or Complementary?

The writers of the books of Mathew and Luke cover different aspects of the lineages of Jesus. They do not contradict, but instead they complement one another.

Credit: Staindglass in Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church

Copyright: Catholic Church

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
 
The fig tree is actually a similitude which represents Israel and how that when he came the first time, there was no fruit to be gathered. So he cursed the fig tree, or should we say Israel that it shall bear no fruit until the end time. That is why we are told that when Israel comes into the land and bears fruit that we can know that the time of the end is near. 1948 Israel became a nation again after almost 2000 years of being dispersed among the nations. Sorry I got carried away 0==[======>

Posted on 11/01/2007 at 7:11:00 PM

 
not sure of any particular personal belief, but still I like how you wrote this, Nick.

Posted on 11/01/2007 at 6:11:00 PM

 
"Jesus For the Non-Religious" by John Shelby Spong will not prove popular with most Christians. He's an Episcopal bishop, although critics say he should have been excommunicated. Right or wrong, he asserts that Mary was a human mother, not a miraculous version, and that Jesus was a human person who embodied God but was not a supernatural miracle worker. The point I gain from it is to do what is right for right's sake, not in hopes of a supernatural reward. At any rate as it relates to this piece, most theologians agree that Mark wrote the first gospel about 70 A.D., then about 10 years later came Matthew and Luke, and John was almost into 100 A.D. So, who knows? There's some wierd stuff in the Bible, especially the Old Testament. I love 99 percent of what Jesus said and stood for, but why did he get mad at the fig tree for having no figs when the weather was out of season for figs? ??????? I'm agnostic; not atheist, there is a huge difference. I'm just not sure of any particular perso

Posted on 11/01/2007 at 6:11:00 PM

 
Very well written. Oh how I wish people would take the time to not only read, but study the Bible for themselves. It would settle 90% of the unnecessary debates that take up so much of our time. Great job!

Posted on 10/31/2007 at 9:10:00 AM

 
Very informative...oh how I do love the way that you can mix Religion..not "just" Religion..but Christian theology with Philosophy!..Great Write...

Posted on 10/31/2007 at 5:10:00 AM

 
And John gave his genealogy directly from God..."in the beginning was the Word and the Word was God and the Word was with God."......"And thinking Himself of no reputation took upon himself the form of man." Great article.

Posted on 10/30/2007 at 8:10:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
Most Commented On