Find » Lifestyle » Parenting » Should Parents Use Spanking as a Fo...

Should Parents Use Spanking as a Form of Punishment?

To Spank or Not to Spank, That is the Question

By Jennifer McQuade, published Nov 03, 2007
Published Content: 38  Total Views: 18,320  Favorited By: 0 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.0 of 5
There are many different opinions on whether or not you should spank your children. I personally was brought up with spankings and there seems to be no harm done. There's a new age of time outs and noses in the corner. Are we doing what's right by not enforcing the same type of punishments our parents chose for us?

In defense of not spanking, there are several reasons the cynics disapprove of this mild form of corporate punishment. They say it can teach your child that being violent is the way to deal with the things they don't approve, which is contradictory to "violence is not the way."

It can also make the child feel as if there is something wrong with them rather than there is something wrong with their behavior. They also say that spanking renders any other form of communication between you and your child.

Now to counter the claims with my own personal opinion, I don't think it is teaching your child to be violent. On the other hand I think it is teaching them that if they don't behave the way they should, there will be consequences. I think it is very similar to adults going to jail. If as an adult you 'behave' a way you shouldn't and commit a crime, there will be consequences.

You can't put your kid in jail, and the corner or time out will not be remembered as greatly as a spanking. Any of the times I've ever spanked my children we sat down afterwards and I told them I still loved them even though what they did was not the way they were taught to behave. I never tell them I'm spanking them because they were bad or they ARE bad.

I let them know that the way they were acting or behaving was not good. My general psychology teacher, whom used to be employed by DSS, stated that if we choose to spank our children safely from the law we should use our hands only on their butts. I agree with this, I think the belt is a little on the cruel side. I also don't think that the corner or time out should be kicked to the curb entirely.

Comments
Comments 1 - 2 of 2
 
 
I can understand the non-spankers point of you're teaching violence to stop violence. I don't agree with this because you're not beating the child or slapping them in the face. You're not teaching violence necessarily, you're teaching that they will get a 'spanking'. By giving your child a spanking, you're not telling them to go out and beat the crap out of someone or rob a liquor store. I tried to do things your way when he pinched his sister (who is a baby I might add). I 'explained' why his actions were wrong and why he shouldn't do that and yet he continued to pinch his sister (a baby). So then I spanked him the third time and amazingly it hasn't happened again. He can still develop logic and proper reasoning and critical thinking if he gets explained the situation before and after his spanking.

Posted on 11/05/2007 at 5:11:00 AM

 
I fail to see how physical punishment is a logical choice in disciplining children and I'm more than a little perplexed at your story of spanking a child for pinching his sister. How is hitting a child, which is a form of physical punishment, logically a good choice for telling them not to physically hurt their sister? It sounds to me to be a case of "do as I say, not as I do," and not setting a proper example. Furthermore, time-outs and corners simply do not work. The child needs to have a proper explanation of why it is not OK to pinch his sister. This way he will develop logic and proper reasoning, as well as critical thinking, and use it later on in his life. Spanking is the lazy way out.

Posted on 11/05/2007 at 2:11:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 2 of 2
 
Advertisment