Circumcision Increases MRSA Risk

The National Organization of Circumcision Information Resource Centers (known as NOCIRC) released a warning last week regarding the increased risk of MRSA for newborn boys who are circumcised.

MRSA stands for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus also known as the "Super Bug". Staphylococcus is a bacterial staph infection. MRSA is much harder to treat as it's immune to most antibiotic treatments. MRSA can be deadly
Circumcision Increases MRSA Risk
Date: October 29, 2007
 and has been referred to the flesh eating disease in regards to how it attacks the tissues of the body.

MRSA tends to be found in hospital settings and occasionally clinics and outpatient Doctor's offices. Often, health care workers are carriers which can be highly dangerous as they come in contact with patients who have compromised immune systems every time they go to work.

MRSA has spread quickly and new strains have developed so that it's reached the community on a bigger level. This is known as CA-MRSA or community MRSA which has begun replacing ordinary treatable staph infections. The CA-MRSA is then brought into hospitals by employees, patients and visitors and spread thus further.

Newborns in nurseries, particularly NICU (Neonatal Intensive Care Units) are at great risk of complications and even death when infected by antibiotic-resistant bacteria. For comparison, MRSA death rates are 1.5 times higher per year than HIV. That's a lot of tragedies that could possibly be avoided.

Boys who are circumcised now have a 12 times higher risk of contracting MRSA than those who are left intact. Newborns immune systems are developing and immature in many aspects. Once they have an open wound, the risk is that much higher.

Circumcisions are often done in hospitals where MRSA circulates. Surgical tools are used for the procedure and while they are hopefully adequately sanitized, the increased chance of bacteria entering a fresh opening into the body makes MRSA more likely to invade.

Related information
 
Comments 1 - 10 of 11 Next >>
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

Great article Katherine.

Posted on 11/27/2007 at 11:11:00 AM

Yikes, Katie! Some tough crowd readers, eh? You do an awesome job stating the facts and statistics.

Posted on 11/08/2007 at 6:11:00 PM

It makes sense but it wasn't anything I'd thought about before, glad you brought it to my attention.

Posted on 11/08/2007 at 12:11:00 PM

circ rates decline see this http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/285540/circumcision_rates_fall_in_the_united.html thanks :)

Posted on 11/06/2007 at 5:11:00 PM

>70%?? where did you get that number? The rates are actually much lower, 57% being average and 21% in california. AND I would be willing to guess it's even lower now as circumcision rates are steadily dropping and have been for decades. Circumcision debate aside, it's not psuedo-science... I mean doesn't it just make sense that the risk of MRSA or any type of infection for that matter would be higher?

Posted on 11/06/2007 at 5:11:00 PM

This is utter crap - like saying that 2+2=5 - this is just worthless propaganda dressed up to look like news. US parents don't be fooled by the pseudo-science and continue to circumcise your sons! >70% of US parents can't be wrong!

Posted on 11/06/2007 at 5:11:00 PM

propoganda?? seriously?? How can an open wound in such a sensitive area like the genitals NOT increase the chance of infection, particularily with a brand new baby who's immune system is far from developed. That and baby boy's who are circ'd in the hospital have a lot more "hands-on" care from nurses, parents, doctors because of the cosmetic surgery they just endured. Same for once they go home, which is also where many newborn catch MRSA. WHY, WHY would anyone want to increase their risk of something so serious? Regardless of the percentage of increase, it just doesn't make any sense to me.

Posted on 11/06/2007 at 11:11:00 AM

This article is complete propaganda...just look at who did the study. Not only that, they misuse their numbers (which are probably invented anyway) by calling a 12% increase "12 times more likely). These people are idiots who have no life.

Posted on 11/06/2007 at 10:11:00 AM

Great article about a significant risk most new parents know nothing about. MRSA is a quickly progressing infection especially in newborns. Any newly circumcised infant who shows indications of infection at the circumcision site should be taken to a doctor's office or emergency room for diagnosis and treatment as any delay can be deadly. Just a fine point . . . in the "Take Aways" section, circumcision increases the risk of an MRSA infection by 1,220%, not 12%.

Posted on 11/05/2007 at 8:11:00 PM

One more reason not to circ and to advocate to get that % down to 0!

Posted on 11/05/2007 at 6:11:00 PM

Comments 1 - 10 of 11 Next >>