Find » Society » History » Why the Constitution is a Holy Docu...

Why the Constitution is a Holy Document

By Brett, published Nov 05, 2007
Published Content: 100  Total Views: 19,850  Favorited By: 17 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.4 of 5
In recent years, the Constitution has been subject to a great deal of political debate. It is customary for liberals to say that President Bush has trampled over the Bill of Rights even as conservatives throughout America fight against liberals who claim that the Constitution is a "living" document. No matter what side you are on though, virtually everyone agrees that it is wrong to go against the Constitution. The debate is not really about whether or not the Constitution should be disregarded, but rather about just what it means to disregard it. Indeed, many Americans seem to view our Constitution as a holy document. Maybe that's because it is.

The truth is that if someone were to read history with the idea that there is a God in Heaven and that that same God will at times intervene in earthly affairs, they would come to the conclusion that this God has directly involved Himself in the founding of the United States of America. Perhaps the earliest example of this is the defeat of the Spanish Armada. At the actual Battle of Gravelines, the Spanish Armada suffered few casualties and retreated more because of having broken formation than because of an actual defeat. After the battle, the Armada attempted to sail around the British Isles and return to Spain, where they could prepare for a second attack. However, the Armada suffered heavy losses due to storms. When what remained of the once-proud Spanish Armada returned to the Iberian Peninsula, it was clear that a second attempt was completely infeasible. With the defeat of the Armada, England emerged as a naval superpower, opening up the door to English settlement in the New World. In honor of the weather's effects on the Armada, Queen Elizabeth ordered that one of the medals bear the words "God breathed and the enemy was defeated".

Takeaways
  • God is responsible for the founding of America.
  • The Constitution is based on the will of God.
Comments
Comments 1 - 15 of 35
Next >>
 
As in all things related to faith, we tend to look at the same objective occurrences in the world that is, and interpret them in ways that support our personal beliefs. Brett looks at history and sees the obvious fingerprint of God's intervention. Others would simply see the random occurrences that come out of an immensely complicated chaotic system. Which is right? No way to tell, and no need either. There is no way to convince the faithful to stop believing, nor to convince the atheist to start. The article is well thought out, and assuming the history is correct (which I will not take the time to establish) the thesis is nicely supported. This does not mean everyone reading it will (or should) take out a bible and start praying. Part of the wonder of our society is that we do not need to agree on our beliefs to be able to live in the same place and act together when needed.

Posted on 01/22/2008 at 5:01:09 AM

 
Interesting piece...you know what you're talking about, whether you're right or wrong.

Posted on 12/22/2007 at 5:12:46 PM

 
Oh, and I don't consider you and Jeff "opponents". That term implies that we are in some sort of contest that can be won. The beliefs that you and Jeff hold are no more provable in the physical realm than mine. So in reality you are not opponents just fellow searchers.

Posted on 12/14/2007 at 11:12:55 AM

 
I go away for a little while and I miss Jack's response to my discussion with Jeff. I apologize for that last sentence, Jack and Jeff sounds like the title of a bad children's book. So I just want to clarify, so as not to misunderstand your post. Are you calling me personally close-minded, unintelligent and insane or just everyone who believes in a God? The first I can forgive because, let's face it you and I have never met, so maybe I am all those things. However, if you are giving those definitions to anyone who believes in God then I believe a study of history puts you on very shaky if not completely crumbling ground. And let's at least be honest. Everything on this site is presumptuos. One could very easily say that you and Jeff's belief that there is no God is presumptuos. We all have presuppositions. That is the nature of this site.

Posted on 12/14/2007 at 10:12:12 AM

 
Very good post Brett. I must say, however, I was disappointed that those who disagree with your ideas could not bring up any concrete evidence, no historical quotes. A nice chat on opinions but Jeff, you really should read more on what Christians believe and then use refrences such as the Bible to back your claims on their belief system, it gives stronger foundation to your currently flawed claims. Also, Jack, I don't quite get why it is ridiculous to claim that God gives us free will, why shouldn't He? What kind of God are we looking at here? Please explain why this is ridiculous, I'd like to understand. :) Forgive me for butting into the conversation, I was intrigued.

Posted on 12/11/2007 at 2:12:24 AM

 
Also, what Scott said was not actually presumptuous at all. Jeff entered an argument with Scott and myself about the moral nature of God. Naturally, an argument of this type requires the assumption--if only within the argument itself--that God exists and that He is allpowerful. Based on these assumptions, it is perfectly reasonable to say that God has given Jeff a right to choose whether or not to accept Him because if He didn't...well then we really wouldn't be having this discussion.

Posted on 11/26/2007 at 7:11:00 AM

 
Well Jack, I pretty much just posted the prayer because it was Thanksgiving and I figured I should do something in honor of that. You have to understand that for me there's a certain romanticism associated with ideas and concepts that don't have an actual physical presence but still have an impact on the physical world. A prayer that is given any kind of permanent manifestation in the physical world really appeals to that.

Posted on 11/26/2007 at 7:11:00 AM

 
Brett, I do have one serious question: Why did you break into prayer in the middle of the argument? Clearly it wasn't for the benefit of God, because you could have prayed to him silently.

Posted on 11/25/2007 at 9:11:00 PM

 
How presumptuous you're being, Scott. You said that God gave Jeff a right to have nothing to do with him. What you don't seem to understand (or maybe you do and you know this gets under your opponent's skin) is that to freethinking, intelligent, sane people that sounds like, "Superman of Krypton gave you the right not to have anything to do with him." It often ends debate because it's really such a ridiculous statement. (By the way, I agree with you about the nature of Internet debate and how it can turn ugly for no good reason).

Posted on 11/25/2007 at 9:11:00 PM

 
God is God in good and bad and times and I have even found him to be more real in the dark times. He has certainly taught me more during those times than in the good. I respect your right to have nothing to do with God afterall He gave you that right. He is also big enough to handle being called an "absentee landlord" or "self-serving maniac". However, you may just have to come to the conclusion that while you may want nothing to do with Him. He may want everything to do with you.

Posted on 11/24/2007 at 1:11:00 PM

 
Jeff, don't get angry. It's not personal it is a discussion of ideas. Sometimes it gets heated, but it's not personal. In my short time veiwing and participating in these discussions I have found that you and others also have a tendency resort to "hominem attacks and viotrolic name calling". It's the nature of the beast when it comes to online debates. Mainly because sarcasm does not translate well and the sly wink can not come across in a posting. I find these discussions very enjoyable. I even enjoyed my time sparring with Jack Oceano, though I feel he was also taking my sarcasm personally. I appreciate and admire anyone willing to set their arguments and thoughts out for display and possible ridicule. That is true even for people I disagree with. My faith and life requires that I constantly deal with the question of whether there is a God. To this point He has never failed to make himself real in my life. That is all from which I can speak. God is God in good and bad and t

Posted on 11/24/2007 at 1:11:00 PM

 
Jeff, all you have just said is that our arguments are inadequate. You have not given any reason why they are inadequate except for a little comment about how the Bible says children don't have free will. This is not true, children do not have a full understanding of the world around them and so an adult or teenager must take responsibility for them but they still have the option of disobeying that guardian. The kind of free will you are talking about is at a completely different level from the free will that God gives us. You have been arguing without any kinds of facts to back you up, leaving me to conclude that you are trying to win this argument simply by getting the last word. Unfortunately for you, I get a little email every time you post a comment on something I wrote, making that tactic pretty much useless.

Posted on 11/24/2007 at 11:11:00 AM

 
Scott..."free will" that's a easy cop-out for your lack of explanation. Christians will always claim god is there for the good things, yet decry "free will" or the "devil" for the bad. I thought children couldn't excercise "free will" according to christianity until a certain age. And Brett, you came through for me. I hold that all Christians, no matter how righteous they claim to be, will eventually resort to ad hominem attacks and vitriolic name calling when they are met with someone who calls them out consistently on their mythologies. Face it guys, your god is either an absentee landlord who doesn't care about the tenement he "built" or he is a self-serving maniac. Scott, you say I can't prove it one way or another. True. Beyond that, I don't care. Even if your god exists, I want nothing to do with him.

Posted on 11/24/2007 at 9:11:00 AM

 
Jeff, I would buy your argument about the needy children of Africa proving that there is no God if there weren't millions of people being served by faith based organizations. Compassion International, the Salvation Army, the organizations started by Mother Theresa, just to name a few. Eventually you are going to need to understand the theological concept of free will in order to argue this point effectively, but I doubt you will take the time and effort. In regards to your statements on "fact based" educational environments, what facts do you have that prove there is no God. An honest assessment is that you have none. You can not physically prove there is no God just as I can not physically prove there is. So which of the two blind men is more correct?

Posted on 11/23/2007 at 4:11:00 PM

 
Thank you God for your sacrifice on the cross. Thank you, Almighty Lord, for my friends, my family, my teachers, and even my enemies--I am sure they are less of a pain to those that they know personally. I thank you for your love and patience and I offer my life to you, asking that you will show your love through me. In Jesus Christ's holy name, Amen.

Posted on 11/22/2007 at 10:11:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 15 of 35
Next >>
Advertisment