The History and Future of the Death Penalty

Adjust font-size: + 
More:Cruel and UnusualCalifornia Death RowLaci Peterson
"If we execute murders and there is in fact no deterrent effect, we have killed a bunch of murders. If we fail to execute murders, and doing so would in fact have deterred other murders, we have allowed the killing of a
 bunch of innocent victims. I would much rather risk the former. This, to me, is not a tough call." - John McAdams, Marquette University/Department of Political Science, on deterrence.

The death penalty is a topic that has been a major issue of debate within the criminal justice system for hundreds of years. Is it ethical? Is it cruel and unusual punishment? Would the world be a better place if we did enforce the death penalty more often than we do or would it even make a difference in the amount of crime committed? Those are all questions that may never really be answered. Everyone has their opinion but since the early Eighteenth Century B.C., criminals have, at times, paid for their crimes and/or sins with the ultimate punishment: death.

History

The first death penalty laws were established in the Eighteenth Century B.C. in the Code of King Hammaurabi of Babylon. The methods of execution were much more extreme than they are today, including crucifixion, drowning, beating, burning and impalement. It wasn't until the Tenth Century A.D., in Britain, that hanging became the usual method of execution. However, under the reign of William the Conqueror, the death penalty was not enforced. It wasn't until the Sixteenth Century and the reign of Henry VIII that we saw the death penalty strictly enforced with an estimated 72,000 executions for crimes such as marrying a Jew, treason or not confessing to a crime. This reign saw the introduction of boiling, beheading and drawling and quartering as methods of execution.

 
Type in Your Comments Below

I personaly think that Capital Punishment is wrong. I found a quote once while working on a debate in my english class. it read " why kill people who kill people to show people that killing people is wrong." Which is my exact thoughts on Capital Punishment. Yes if something happened to me or my family i would probably want revenge but there is many things to take into account. Like, the family of the murderer. should they have to go through the same thing that i went through when their son or daughter killed one of my family memebers? I dont think so they are not responsible for the actions of their son or daughter. Etc.
i think its CRUEL this shiuld be banned
Sorry I have to take issue with a point raised in this article about innocent people on Death Row becoming a part of the past and is becoming a rare occasion, when men such as Cleve Foster, Michael Perry, Robert Will, Brett Hartman and Reece Mason are all sitting on Death Row in either Texas or Ohio all of these men have strong evidence that they are innocent and yet still they are awaiting execution, I wrote an article on this issue and as it was pointed out one of the people that I mentioned who was exonerated is a repeat offender and the DP served as no deterent.Fast tracking appeals may save money but how many innocent lives will be lost by doing so and can you put a dollar amount on what the life of an innocent man executed by the state is worth to the families, especially when after their loved one is executed and no one will ever be held accountable for it. or have you forgotten like so many others that those on Death Row have family that love them too. they will never see justi
Comments 1 - 3 (of 3) 
Share
Tweet
Share on Facebook
Post a comment
3
8
Helpful?
Most Commented