Mitt Romney's Spectacularly Sexist Attack Ad Elucidates Mormon Misogyny

Romney Attacks Hillary Clinton as a Woman on the Premise a Woman Should Not Be President

Willard "Mitt" Romney, the former governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, has been running hard in New Hampshire throughout 2007, spending millions of dollars on television ads targeting Republicans and crossover voters in the run-up to the
Republican Presidential primary. New Hampshire has more registered independent voters than registered Republicans or Democrats and a semi-open primary in which Independents, on Election day, can request the ballot of either party. To woo Independents as well as Republicans, Romney pitches many of his ads as if he is fighting a general election, attacking the Democratic candidates. (From February 2007, when he announced his candidacy, though July, Romney personally spent $4.9 million on his TV ad campaigns, according to the Associated Press. He has a personal fortune estimated at $250 million.)

Romney recently launched an attack ad in the New Hampshire TV market that features a speech attacking Hillary Clinton, the favorite for the Democratic Presidential nomination, before a cheering crowd. In the ad, he bitterly denounces Hillary for having no real-life experience running a business, or a government, or anything at all in contrast to himself, a successful businessman who ran a state and operated the 2002 Salt Lake City Olympic Games. His theme is change (the Olympic Games were tainted by scandal before Romney took over), and he positions himself as an agent of change, in contrast to Hillary, who is not only portrayed as powerless, but immature. He says that the United States can't afford Hillary undertaking an "internship" in which she will have to learn the Presidency.

Related information
 
Comments 1 - 10 of 12 Next >>
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

....interesting... the first four comments on the article are by the author himself. He is obviously really "beside himself" with emotion over the topic - had to continue to thow additional jabs "after the bell". Could HE have an agenda himself??? Nah... surely THAT couldn't be... right???

Posted on 03/22/2008 at 7:03:16 PM

Good Mittster quote: http://livefreeordiecampaigning.blogspot.com/2007/12/herr-einstein-modern-gop.html

Posted on 12/04/2007 at 10:12:00 AM

The Mormon Church is misogynistic. That is irrefutable. I am a person who lives in the 21st Century, not the 19th, and I believe in equal rights for women and people of color. I am against anyone who would turn back the clock in a way that would erode fundamental human rights. Mitt Romney is a scabrous individual. He reminds me of what Hamlet tells Horatio about Lucifer (which The Ghost clealy was understood to be by Elizabethan/Jacobin audiences): "The devil hath power/To assume a pleasing shape."

Posted on 12/04/2007 at 10:12:00 AM

Mitt Romney, as his Senate and gubenatorial bids in Massachusetts (as well as his behavior as a "medicore one-term governor", to quote Rudy G's campaign manager) is an unprincipled liar. If I were a fundamentalist Christian, I would be convinced that he was the leading candidate for Anti-Christ, if not the Republican Presidential nomination.

Posted on 12/04/2007 at 10:12:00 AM

I do not suport Hillary Clinton.

Posted on 12/04/2007 at 10:12:00 AM

What a pathethic rant. You could have saved a lot of time by just stating the whole point of your article in one sentence. "I love Hillary, and I think that Mormons suck." There is not political value to this at all. How does Mr. Smith's 33 wives have anything to do with the Romney campaign. Nothing but a tasteless attack on Romney and his faith.

Posted on 11/27/2007 at 5:11:00 PM

By the headline of this attack article/op-ed, "...Spectacularly Sexist Attack..." I was expecting more, much more than simply an "internship" reference. Eight pages of essaying based on one word? A more intellectually honest title and analyis would say "subtley sexist". I can see the argument there. but "spectacularly"? lol. i guess it depends on what the definition of "spectacular" is.

Posted on 11/27/2007 at 4:11:00 PM

Your analysis in this piece, like much of your other articles on Romney, are so poorly reasoned, wantonly biased, and desperately distorted that it begs the question, "How can you expect anyone to take you seriously?" You well know that Clinton made virtually the same attack on Obama's lack of experience recently, "''There is one job we can't afford on-the-job training for - our next president. That could be the costliest job training in history,'' Clinton said. ''Every day spent learning the ropes is another day of rising costs, mounting deficits and growing anxiety for our families. And they cannot afford to keep waiting.'' HOW DARE SHE INFER THAT A BLACK MAN NEEDS "ON THE JOB TRAINING"! By your abysmal logic this quote is the height of racist innuendo on Hillary's part I suppose. The only person that needs to be chided is the author of this bigoted article that tries to conflate Mormonism somehow with a legitimate criticism of Clinton's lack of experience (she's the one claiming h

Posted on 11/27/2007 at 11:11:00 AM

Your complete lack of understanding of the LDS faith discredits your entire article. Thank you for your attempt but please check your sources before spouting things that are not true.

Posted on 11/27/2007 at 11:11:00 AM

So the use of the word intern, to you, means that he equated her to ML rather than the word meaning someone learning on the job, a phrase Hillary has used to describe Obama. I also find it interesting that you attack Romney for what you perceive to be his beliefs about women and yet you have no problem attacking his religion. Hillary, after playing the gender card, claimed she is the front runner and that is why she is being attacked. You are saying it is indeed because she is a woman. Would you be so willing to attack a Muslim candidate or public figure for his beliefs about women? I don't support Romney but his religion is not an issue with me just like Clinton being a woman or Obama being black means nothing as well. I think the only one taking issue is you and it is obvious that you are campaigning for Hillary. Will your next column be about how some candidate, whose family held slaves, really believes Obama is unqualified because he should be in servitude in

Posted on 11/27/2007 at 5:11:00 AM

Comments 1 - 10 of 12 Next >>