About Credit-for-Writing

Ingenious! What I did with the description,

... think about it, how did you plan to find out what writers' credit really means to me, did you plan to--I dunno--follow a link to my work?

And if there were something else you would expect to find out from one who could tell you what writers' credit means ('something else' like "how going-with-FLOW leads to prosperous life"), how would you find that out? What 'link' would you follow?

And do you see how much more-effective learning is when it's asked in the form of a question? I think Socrates wrote something about stating/arguing by asking questions---but I could be wrong.

The point there is that hearing/answering questions invokes a mental emotion in response (along with whatever reasoning is also activated). That's using a fact Napoleon Hill gave in his writing: "Emotion is a form of energy the mind uses to etch information into the subconscious memory."

For instance, I would give you a link to my work, if it were permitted by AssociatedContent. Why doesn't AssociatedContent permit the link, because it would make your rating above too personaly-biased.

That link wouldn't be some hypertext-code--not that kind of link, no--it would be simply my name.

That would tell you how to get more writing like the writing you're reading. And 'a link to my work' is the only real (eternal) reason writing-credit matters.

(Oh, it's good to "keep tabs on your copyright" that you may experience the most-direct profit from your work while you live to claim it, but that really doesn't matter when you advance beyond the mortal condition!)