Find » Health & Wellness » The Circumcision Decision

The Circumcision Decision

To Cut or Not to Cut

By Netty Holdridge, published Nov 19, 2007
Published Content: 3  Total Views: 0  Favorited By: 2 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.7 of 5
My first born was a beautiful baby girl. I adored her and came home from the hospital beaming with joy at her perfect little fingers and toes. Four years later, we were blessed to have a son. We had been through it all before, or so we thought. We quickly realized that we needed to make a choice about whether or not we were going to circumcise our new baby. It was not easy. We faced our own ignorance on the subject, our cultural assumptions, and the opinions of those close to us. In the end, we left Casey intact, or uncircumcised. Several things we learned helped drive that decision.

The AAP no longer recommends routine infant circumcision.1

After looking at over 40 years of medical research, the American Association of Pediatrics stated that the benefits were not significant enough for the organization to recommend the procedure. "Circumcision is not essential to a child's well-being at birth." says Carol Lannon, MD, MPH, FAAP, chair of the AAP's Task Force on Circumcision.

Circumcision has only potential health benefits.

Often times, a parent will decide to circumcise believing it to prevent a myriad of health problems. In actuality, circumcision does not ensure freedom from issues. An intact boy has a 1 in 100 chance of contracting a urinary tract infection in his first year of life; for circumcised babies this risk drops to 1 in 1000. The AAP states that the absolute risk is low, 1 percent at most. The risk for penile cancer is higher for intact men as well, but the overall risk is extremely low. Circumcised men may have a lower risk of certain STD's but lifestyle is the main factor in determining whether a sexually transmitted disease will be contracted. None of these potential benefits are strong enough to justify genital surgery on a newborn.

Circumcision is surgery, and therefore carries risks.

Any surgery carries inherent risks. The most common complications after a circumcision are bleeding and infection. Complications occur in 1 in 200 to 1 in 500 circumcised newborns.2 Other complications include meatal stenosis, fistula, phimosis, and buried penis.

Circumcision permanently alters the function of the penis.

Comments
Comments 1 - 9 of 9
 
 
After weighing the research, I have definitely decided not to circumcise if I ever have a little boy. My best friend is not circumcised and I truly believe it's best for everyone - especially the boy!

Posted on 07/03/2008 at 3:07:47 PM

 
Cut off that NASTY foreskin!

Posted on 12/23/2007 at 7:12:47 PM

 
Ok. Insurance. By that logic, I think I'll go ahead and have my daughter's breast buds removed to prevent her ever getting breast cancer. On the off chance my son has an issue with his foreskin, I will do what I would do if he had an issue with his kidney. Or his eye. Or his fingernail. Or any other NORMAL part of his body.

Posted on 12/19/2007 at 6:12:27 AM

 
I did my research online and talking to uncircumcised friends. However, after further investigation its quite possible that some uncircumsized men have some problems with their foreskin while others do not. To minimize potential problems with the foreskin, all guys should be circumcised. Kinda like buying insurance. I know if my son had issues with his foreskin I would feel guilty I didnt have him circumsised. Wouldnt you feel that way?

Posted on 12/18/2007 at 9:12:45 PM

 
Corey--I think you need to do a bit more research. The whole "unclean" arguement is total BS. Speaking from experiance, having been with an intact partner, the one-minute idea is not true, either.

Posted on 12/14/2007 at 9:12:31 AM

 
Ladies, I am a circumcised man who believes that not circumcising your son carries risks. There have been some men who have difficulty retracting their foreskin while others have a hard time keeping their penises clean and unsmelly due to smegma. There is still plenty of sexual feeling for circumsized men. Uncircumized men have penis heads EXTREMELY sensitive, making them prime targets to be a "one minute" man. Bacteria can build up in the foreskin making it less "clean" than a circumcised man requiring much more frequent cleaning dependent upon the number of erections that particular man has in any given day.

Posted on 12/14/2007 at 8:12:11 AM

 
Well done and informative. (Shameless plug for me) I wrote a piece a while back that looked at the issue of circumcision and Christianity.

Posted on 12/04/2007 at 6:12:00 AM

 
Working as a nurse I found out that there were minimal reasons to circumcise a little boy. The main issue is teaching the child to cleanse himself when old enough. I have a son and was not able to subject him to it. I have seen countless procedures and they are barbaric. Good article.

Posted on 11/19/2007 at 6:11:00 PM

 
Nicely written, Netty. We only have daughters, but like you, we've made the decision not to circumcise any sons we have when the time comes.

Posted on 11/19/2007 at 1:11:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 9 of 9
 
Advertisment