How Media Coverage of the Vietnam War Changed America, Journalism

By Sara Hall, published Nov 25, 2007
Published Content: 7  Total Views: 2,445  Favorited By: 0 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.0 of 5
Reporters and photographers went through a big change in the Vietnam War and changed the style of reporting the war for future journalists. They went from reporting directly off of press releases and forming happy, enthusiastic stories to investigative reporting and writing cold, hard truthful stories. The stories coming from Vietnam and the photos coming from the front line did more than sway public opinion, they helped end the war.

The Vietnam War was fought between 1957 and 1975 on the ground in South Vietnam and bordering areas of Cambodia and Laos and in bombing runs over North Vietnam. The Vietnam War is often called the most unpopular American war of the twentieth century. It resulted in nearly 60,000 American deaths and an estimated 2 to 4 million Vietnamese deaths (Digital). Estimating the number killed in the conflict is extremely difficult, the true death count will probably never be known (Vietnam War).

Early on in the Vietnam War, many of the correspondents supported the war effort. They did not question the right of the United States to be there (Kahrs). Before the Vietnam War, the media's job was to keep the American listeners and readers optimistic and panic free. During the Korean War, U.S. actions were always presented in a positive light. But soon in the Vietnam War, reporters began to show skepticism of the government's presence and their intentions The correspondents' reports began to reflect the popular doubts that had been rising among the American public, primarily because of the increasing numbers of casualties. The reporters and photographers did not have as much enthusiasm as they had when they were first went to Vietnam; they were finding sad stories and painful pictures.

Takeaways
  • Journalists went through a big change in the Vietnam War and changed the style of reporting the war
  • Because of the effort to reveal the truth, many Americans began to doubt the government and the war
  • Photos and TV brought the war home and helped sway American public's opinion against the war
Did You Know?
Vietnam was lost in the living rooms of America--not on the battlefields of Vietnam," said Marshall McLuhan. The media and photos undoubtedly had an affect on the American public and their opinion about the war and the government
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
 
Obviously, I had a problem getting my comments in one post. I wholeheartedly support a free press and journalists that want to get to the truth of a story. Sadly, Vietnam demonstrated to many that headlines sold papers and brought fame to many that reported in error or in a biased manner. War is indeed horrendous. One final fact - From 1957 to 1973, the National Liberation Front assassinated 36,725 Vietnamese and abducted another 58,499. The death squads focused on leaders at the village level and on anyone who improved the lives of the peasants such as medical personnel, social workers, and school teachers. - Nixon Presidential Papers. Tens of thousands were killed by the communists after the US withdrew.

Posted on 03/30/2008 at 7:03:18 AM

 
No American had involvement in the incident that burned Phan Thi Kim Phuc. The planes doing the bombing near the village were Vietnam Air Force and were being flown by Vietnamese pilots in support of South Vietnamese troops. The Vietnamese pilot who dropped the napalm in error is currently living in the United States. Even the AP photographer, Nick Ut, who took the picture, was Vietnamese. The incident in the photo took place on the second day of a three day battle between the NVA who occupied the village of Trang Bang and the ARVN (Army of the Republic of Vietnam) who were trying to force the NVA out of the village. Reports in the news media that an American commander ordered the air strike that burned Kim Phuc were incorrect. There were no Americans involved in any capacity. "Americans had nothing to do with controlling VNAF," according to Lieutenant General (Ret) James F. Hollingsworth who was there at the time.

Posted on 03/30/2008 at 7:03:26 AM

 
Thanks for your writing - well done! While it changed journalism, I'm not certain as to how much it was for the better. To the extent that it revealed truth it was good, but as it took a position on the war and reported in a biased fashion, it created a situation that cemented the resolve of the Viet Cong and NVA. Remember the famous picture of Jane Fonda? Do you think that American soldiers died as a result of any encouragement that was given to their cause by the American press? I hope you were taught that TET was a huge American victory. The problem was that the reports portrayed it differently and it was the turning point that led to America's withdrawal. I hope that you were also taught that Vietnam resulted in many positives in the fight against Communism and that the domino theory was accurate. The ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) countries, Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand stayed free of Communism because of the U.S. commitment to Vi

Posted on 03/30/2008 at 7:03:32 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
Most Commented On