Airman Jose Cossio Pleads Guilty of Creating False Military Website

By Charles Duncan, published Nov 21, 2007
Published Content: 238  Total Views: 62,237  Favorited By: 0 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.0 of 5
As reported by the U.S. Air Forces, a member of the 1st Special Operations Mission Support Squadron was charged with falsifying an official website. Airman Basic Jose Cossio pleaded guilty to the charge of counterfeiting and was convicted. The website in question was the Hurlburt Field Website. He was also charged with obtaining passwords and network identifications from several individuals.

Airman Cossio is 25 years old. He went before a military judge to plead guilty to two counts of Article 134 and asked the court to give him a chance to get on with his life.

"I am looking for closure, and I think I've found it today," Airman Cossio said during an unsworn statement during the courtroom proceedings. "I am looking forward to getting on with my life."

Lieutenant Colonel Jennifer Whittier presided as the judge in the case and gave Airman Cossio 150 days of confinement along with his pay being docked $1000 for five months. The confinement sentence was given as time served because of an agreement before trial.

"This is the outcome the government was looking for," said Captain Jason Lammli, trial council for the 1st Special Operations Wing. "Airman Cossio can move on, and the government can now move on."

Cossio's case was originally dismissed in 2006. However, the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals reversed the ruling in early 2007.

Airman Cossio has now received two court martials in his military career. In 2004 he was found guilty of unrelated matters. He was sentenced and served eight months in jail for his crime and also received a bad conduct discharge. Cossio was finishing out his appellate leave from the first charges when he caught for the second crimes.

Airman Jose Cossio Pleads Guilty of Creating False Military Website
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
 
Your such an ignoramous to believe everything you read. The "charges" were not even real charges, they were made up 134 offenses. Second, the network IDs were those you testified falsely in the first court-martial, the eMails confirmed this. The prosecutors sent men to make sure the evidence would dissapear and not be used to overturn the first conviction. I'm not going to waste anymore time reasoning with a dope.

Posted on 03/24/2008 at 10:03:17 PM

 
Your such an ignoramous to believe everything you read. The "charges" were not even real charges, they were made up 134 offenses. Second, the network IDs were those you testified falsely in the first court-martial, the eMails confirmed this. The prosecutors sent men to make sure the evidence would dissapear and not be used to overturn the first conviction. I'm not going to waste anymore time reasoning with a dope.

Posted on 03/24/2008 at 10:03:13 PM

 
Your such an ignoramous to believe everything you read. The "charges" were not even real charges, they were made up 134 offenses. Second, the network IDs were those you testified falsely in the first court-martial, the eMails confirmed this. The prosecutors sent men to make sure the evidence would dissapear and not be used to overturn the first conviction. I'm not going to waste anymore time reasoning with a dope.

Posted on 03/24/2008 at 10:03:56 PM

 
Your such an ignoramous to believe everything you read. The "charges" were not even real charges, they were made up 134 offenses. Second, the network IDs were those you testified falsely in the first court-martial, the eMails confirmed this. The prosecutors sent men to make sure the evidence would dissapear and not be used to overturn the first conviction. I'm not going to waste anymore time reasoning with a dope.

Posted on 03/24/2008 at 10:03:43 PM

 
Hey you sack of ****, go ahead and believe everything you read. Maybe it won't ever cross your head that there was a back story to this. Since I am in a generous mood, I will throw you some nuggets like: 1. The "offenses" were made up. Article 134 allows the military to make up charges. There was no Civilian or regular military law violated except what was made up from article 134. 2. The eMail accounts were accessed were some of those who testified in the first Court-Martial and lied. The eMails show that they lied and committed offenses themselves. Of course they were never investigated - No, that would possibly throw out the case. 3. You are a disgrace. A disgrace because you believe everything that you read, do you read the funnies aswell and believe everything in there? How about keeping your inane comments to yourself, you ignoramous.

Posted on 03/24/2008 at 9:03:19 PM

 
What a disgrace.

Posted on 11/22/2007 at 1:11:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
Most Commented On