Find » Opinion/Editorial » 9/11 Conspiracies, Ron Paul, and Sa...

9/11 Conspiracies, Ron Paul, and Saudi Arabian Rape Victim Convictions: What Do They All Have in Common?

By Chadd De Las Casas, published Nov 23, 2007
Published Content: 263  Total Views: 152,010  Favorited By: 28 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.1 of 5
I bet when you hear a woman was raped, the last thing that comes to mind is that she needs to serve jail time, receive lashes from a whip, or worse, even endure capital punishment, but believe it or not, this type of victim conviction occurs on a nearly daily basis in the Islamic world, especially in strictly fundamentalist Saudi Arabia. Just recently, a woman was sentenced to 200 lashes for being the victim of a brutal gang rape. This is actually somewhat lenient, as the Islamic Republic of Iran has shown, as most fundamentalists pretty strictly adhere to the policy set forth by Muhammad: if a woman claims to be raped, she needs to have her story collaborated by 5 males witnesses or she gets stoned for adultery.

But then, maybe we can just dig into Ron Paul's bag of terms and call this "blowback" - if she hadn't gotten herself into a situation that could have resulted in such dire consequences, if she had not gotten into any of the cars to begin with, she wouldn't have become a rape victim. Therefore the answer is to not punish the rapists, but to simply stay out of their cars, wherever they may be.

It may seem like an extreme example, but then, I thought that basically saying we had 9/11 coming was pretty extreme too. Ron Paul, for those who haven't been bombarded by his rather belligerent fan base yet, is a candidate that appears to be running in the wrong primary. Running on a strict isolationist policy, feeding into the hands of 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists by always beating around the ever dangerous bush of suggesting more investigations into 9/11, toeing the line of damning his chance for the White House (as if his fringe and bizarre beliefs weren't enough) by fully trying to suggest Bush himself was behind them.

9/11 Conspiracies, Ron Paul, and Saudi Arabian Rape Victim Convictions: What Do They All Have in Common?

An attack that was evil - but apparently, we deserved it?

Credit: free

Copyright: free

Comments
Comments 1 - 15 of 26
Next >>
 
Here's the thing - wait no, I was going to go into an analogy, but I just realized that the best analogy is the one in the article. Just because you do "something" that makes people angry, doesn't mean that they're justified in that anger. The stated reason for American hatred is supporting Israel - you know what? That's just too damn bad.

Posted on 12/05/2007 at 3:12:00 PM

 
No insanity is to suggest that America holds no blame. If you take a close look at your history, America and her Allies have been involved, covertly, overtly, in forcing their influence all throughout the Middle and Near East. Not to mention South America. Did you honestly think we could go around pushing the rest of the world around with no consequences? Now that is insanity. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. It's physics nothing more.

Posted on 12/05/2007 at 3:12:00 PM

 
Further, my only complaint isn't his isolationist absurdity, it's the fact that he downright blames the United States, and acts as if it did something wrong that WARRANTED 9/11. THAT'S the punishment of the rape victim, it's not Osama's fault or Khalid Sheik Muhammad's fault they rammed planes into our towers, it's OUR fault. Insanity.

Posted on 12/01/2007 at 10:12:00 AM

 
But you see, when you live in a world detached from reality, it becomes easy to go, "Wait, the most horrific conflict in the history of this world ended with a nuclear bomb, that means that we have every reason to believe America will throw it around elsewhere, oh my gadoozles."

Posted on 12/01/2007 at 10:12:00 AM

 
There's a lot more that goes into "reducing military overseas" then just benevolently going "kkz here's j00 guys' country". You have an idiot like Ron Paul yapping about "GIVE IRAQ THEIR COUNTRY BACK", as though they don't have a self-autonomous government, like they don't have their own constitution and laws, like they don't have their own police force and military that is entirely independent of the United States' right there. I tell you what, ask the residents of Kosovo what they think of American foreign intervention.

Posted on 12/01/2007 at 10:12:00 AM

 
Okay, here's the thing... while I think that punishing a rape victim is horrendous, I don't think it compares with wanting to reduce American military around the world. We aren't the world police. If anything, the entire world should be afraid we'll drop another nuclear bomb. It's not like America dropped the first two atom bombs way back in 1945. It's not like the threat of America dropping another nuclear bomb exists. It's not like any of these things, it IS these things.

Posted on 12/01/2007 at 5:12:00 AM

 
No Deez, Ron Paul's idiotic ideals are exactly as absurd as wanting to punish a raped woman. He has done nothing but try to justify Islamic terrorism. He has done nothing but try to downplay the threat of Islamic terrorism. He has done nothing but wave his finger and say "shame shame" at the United States for defending itself. He has done nothing but clamor "We need to retreat behind our borders and stay there and not get involved in the rest of the world." We have two words to describe this kind of Presidential malpractice Deeze, it's called cowardice, and it's called isolationism.

Posted on 11/30/2007 at 11:11:00 AM

 
BTW, this whole article sounds like something Sean Hannity would write. You should be ashamed of yourself. Ron Paul is a good man with a great view of where this country needs to be heading. To tie his political ideology to the rape of a woman is sickening. Furthermore, to say Paul is an isolationist just because he wants to reduce our military presence around the world, protect the homeland, and work for American prosperity you call him an isolationist? That's just BS Chadd.

Posted on 11/30/2007 at 1:11:00 AM

 
I don't even think he does...LOL! So don't feel bad.

Posted on 11/30/2007 at 12:11:00 AM

 
I don't even really know what Brant just said.

Posted on 11/28/2007 at 4:11:00 PM

 
Wrong, Musall, you idiot. THIS is the objective of the Regressive Left: "Community, Identity, Stability". Ah, the Left's brave new world...

Posted on 11/28/2007 at 4:11:00 PM

 
"Bush lied" is always a lie.

Posted on 11/28/2007 at 4:11:00 PM

 
Amen, Rallos.___Sorry, Chadd my friend, but you missed on this one. Ron Paul may not be perfection, but nobody else who is running for President can even hold a candle to him. And he's a far cry better than President Cheney.__As to the abject debuking of the "conspiracy theory" surrounding 9/11/2001, consider the mentality at work: "It is better that one should suffer than that many should be corrupted. Consider the matter dispassionately...and you will see that no offense is so heinous as unorthodoxy of behavior. Murder kills only the individual-and, after all, what is an individual?" ~ Brave New World

Posted on 11/28/2007 at 4:11:00 PM

 
Liberals don't fight, they whine. There's a very real difference. The entire 60's "counter culture" was a culture of whining, and calling it fighting. Liberals risk nothing whatsoever to engage in their pseudobattles fighting windmills and imaginary demons. This was so perfectly demonstrated by the current Congress' first "anti-war" act, a non-binding resolution saying "shame shame".

Posted on 11/27/2007 at 2:11:00 PM

 
I think what you mean Jeff, is you intend to fight it, whether it exists or not, whether people intend for it to exist or not. Your fundamental problem is you want to fight this battle so bad, that you'll make enemies exist, where they don't.

Posted on 11/27/2007 at 1:11:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 15 of 26
Next >>
Advertisment