Hypocrisy in the Pulpit

Richard Roberts Resigns as President of Oral Roberts University Amid Scandal

By Janet Shan, published Nov 24, 2007
Published Content: 26  Total Views: 21,152  Favorited By: 2 CPs
Rating: 3.3 of 5
Richard Roberts Resigns as President of Oral Roberts University

The scandal keeps getting bigger and bigger in the world of organized religion. This is the second scandal in a week to hit a major figure in the religious world, as Archbishop Earl Paulk Jr. of Atlanta was revealed to be the father of his brother's "son," D. E. Paulk, after having an affair with his wife. Richard Roberts, son of Oral Roberts and president of Oral Roberts University, has resigned his position effective immediately. "I love ORU with all my heart. I love the students, faculty, staff and administration, and I want to see God's best for them," Richards wrote in his resignation letter. His decision to resign has come as the school is fighting a wrongful termination lawsuit filed by three professors who accused him and his wife, Lindsay, of misconduct.

John Swails, Tim Brooker and Paulita Brooker have said that they were fired from the University after they reported information indicating that Roberts and his family had lived lavishly by spending school money to finance their lifestyle. Roberts and his wife have vehemently denied the allegations both on Larry King Live and on other media. Equally disturbing is the latest allegations that the university gave "a convicted sexual deviant unrestricted access to students" and evidence in the case had been shredded. Lindsay Roberts has also been accused of repeatedly spending time with an "underage male" in various situations. I wonder if they did not learn anything from the meltdown of Tim Haggard after he said that he did not engage in sexual relations with a male prostitute, only to step down from his position in disgrace.

Hypocrisy in the Pulpit

Richard and Lindsay Roberts of Oral Roberts University and Oral Roberts Ministries

Credit: Oral Roberts University

Copyright: Oral Roberts University

Takeaways
  • Senator Grassley targets six megachurches requesting complete documentation of their finances
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 7 of 7
 
 
Good article! I like the way you synthesized all of these (fairly) recent events into a single theme. It certainly is sad what happens, but like you, we should commend those whose stand strong. I guess all of this scandal and "falling out" makes it look like it must be really difficult to be a church leader living a life of honest, open humility in the love of Christ. Thanks for the article!

Posted on 12/05/2007 at 8:12:00 PM

 
Jeff, You say that all of the "good works" could be better done by secular groups.If that is the case, then why aren't they doing it? And you would take an even money bet that all religious leaders are "thief, Charlatan or morally "different" from what they preach"? If that statement wasn't so tragic, it would be funny. Anyone that believes different than you do is clearly, in your mind, the worst of the worst. Wasn't it you that called several people a fascist?? Hmmmmm.....

Posted on 12/04/2007 at 8:12:00 PM

 
I did not mean to imply godliness is the only sign of goodness, by the way. It is true many good works are done for the sake of humanity, not some higher order.

Posted on 11/28/2007 at 12:11:00 PM

 
If people choose to worship in an organized religion there is nothing wrong with freely giving money to help support the church and its ministries or outreach. There is something very wrong with forcing people to pay for your lavish lifestyle just because you head a church. As a Catholic I have always emulated Mother Teresa, who lived in poverty among the sick and dying she tended, as do all the Missionaries of Charity. She was the exception, not the rule, even within my faith and my Church. The closer to God one is, the more humble in all ways that person should be -if we see a lack of humility and simple living we should suspect an absence of real godliness.

Posted on 11/28/2007 at 12:11:00 PM

 
Jeff, you are right and I totally understand your view and I must say, I agree with you. You are right in your statement that the good works could be done better by secular groups. As a Christian, I have become very disillusioned with organized religion as it stands today. Thanks for the feedback.

Posted on 11/25/2007 at 2:11:00 PM

 
Good article, but I must disagree with a statement that you made close to the end. You said "the church serves a good purpose." The church is out for itself and its own propagation. All of the "good works" could be done much better by secular groups. As for church leaders, I will take an even money bet against any major religioius figure, that they are either thief, charlatan, or quite morally "different" from what they preach.

Posted on 11/25/2007 at 11:11:00 AM

 
Sad. Thinking of Oral Roberts reminds me of my nephew who worshiped the organization. He has a mental illness and would show me the form letter, thinking it was actually a personal note from Roberts, encouraging him in his home study course to become a minister. He most definitely donated a lot of money towards their "lavish" lifestyles, in addition to paying for his courses.

Posted on 11/25/2007 at 7:11:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 7 of 7
 
Most Commented On