The 2008 U.S. Election: Simplistic and Shallow Understandings

Jim Stillman
Jim Stillman
  • Published Content: 171
  • Total Views: 112,687
  • Favorited By: 48 CPs
Full Profile | Subscribe | Add to Favorites

Conservative Media and Candidates Have Reduced the Issues to Bumper Sticker Slogans

Every year, for the past 45 years or so, we have had a Thanksgiving dinner and family gathering in our home; this year was no exception. For three or four days, The Lovely Joan, purchased the "makings" and then proceeded to cook a fantastic meal: cheese platters, veggies and dips, provided by one
daughter, turkey, dressing, sweet potatoes and marshmallows, curried fruit, 12 pounds of mashed potatoes, corn pudding, gravy, five kinds of pies, and on and on. We had originally planned on 18 to 20 people and by the time yesterday arrived, the guest list had grown to nearly 30!

Among the gang were a dozen or so children, ages 2 through 18, including grandsons Joshua and Jake, 18 and 11 respectively. As readers of my various musings and commentaries, I have strongly held opinions and love, absolutely love, being challenged by people who are prepared to offer rational argument. Of all the adults in that gathering who disagreed with me and my opinions, the expressed beliefs of Joshua and Jake were the best presented.

The other evening, while we were recovering from devouring a Thanksgiving meal, complete with massive amounts of calories and gravy, the adults in our home found themselves in groups discussing American politics and the election next November, just under a year away. As host, and resident Liberal, I found myself in several such groups and noted the common misconceptions and shallow reasoning that underpinned much Conservative thought.

 
Comments 1 - 9 of 9  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below
To Halina Z: That "someone wise" was probably a very, very elderly SLAVE !!

Posted on 12/25/2007 at 8:12:08 PM

Jim, you stated "For every terrorist we kill, ten more spring forth." So, what is your solution? We spent one damn long time "talking" to them. Except for Iran and their ILLEGAL taking of US diplomats as hostages, we weren't at war with the Mid-East. Usama is pissed at the US because we had troops on Muslim soil when we threw Saddam out of Kuwait. That's when Usama became our enemy, so he states. He and his attacked us repeatedly before we really responded in any meaningful way. And as to the "sufferings" of the Muslim civilian, sorry. Just like I know young Guenther Germanboy didn't attack the US in WW2, but because Guenther's fellow citizens let Hitler become what he did, Guenther and all his suffered. Sorry 'bout that! If Muslims want peace, let them be the first to tell us where to find Usama and his pals. Lacking that, sorry 'bout that.

Posted on 12/02/2007 at 10:12:00 AM

typo: I meant despise.

Posted on 11/25/2007 at 4:11:00 PM

Did anyone at dinner discuss how Tom Kean, Chairman of the 9/11 Commission, endorsed John McCain, not Rudy Giuliani, as the Republican candidate best suited to "protect" us? It is beyond me how people think Giuliani has any edge with respect to that issue. What has he done with respect to Homeland Security other than recommend his buddy Bernie Kerik for the position of Secretary of Homeland Security...and Kerik is now indicted on federal corruption charges! Giuliani's handling of 9/11 was abhorrent. The true heroes of 9/11 - the NYC Firefighters - depside him! For those who truly believe 9/11 should be the controlling issue in the '08, fine, then at least wake up to the fact Giuliani is the least-qualified candidate to protect anyone!

Posted on 11/25/2007 at 4:11:00 PM

Insightful article! As someone wise once wrote: "There is no greater illusion than fear, no greater wrong than preparing to defend yourself, no greater misfortune than having an enemy. Whoever can see through all fear will always be safe."

Posted on 11/25/2007 at 1:11:00 PM

I think a lot of times, this concept of 'fear' is looked upon as purely negative. Let's not forget that fear is one of the most primal instincts, and often is the only reason species survive. Now, whether certain 'fears' are irrational is another matter entirely. But I think tossing around the word 'fear' so freely does tend to subtly nudge readers into thinking that the TERRORists have 'won'. Shouldn't we be afraid of another attack? I know that ideally, privacy is paramount. But we're seriously trying to be safe, here. And if you think that privacy and idealogical freedoms are more important than living to enjoy them, I think you are fooling yourself. Which do you fear more - imminent attack, or the POSSIBILITY of a corrupt government? I know a lot of things this administration has done have been disagreeable at best, but to give them credit, protection has been the mindset. Let's not wholeheartedly abandon those who try to protect us when they may be the only ones on our s

Posted on 11/24/2007 at 9:11:00 PM

I do fear one thing...that the realities you hit upon, our real freedoms, will be gone before people even realize what they have given up, and how, utlimately, it dishonors our legacy far, far more than any dissent or protest.

Posted on 11/24/2007 at 5:11:00 PM

Carol, sometimes they scare me too! Our leaders have created the fear and use it cynically.

Posted on 11/24/2007 at 5:11:00 PM

Your relatives, like too many Americans, scare me. The Wash Post reported on all the info being gathered by gov't on private citizens in contraventions of established guidelines and the courts have caved in many times and issued warrants without probable cause. Don't people understand where this leads?

Posted on 11/24/2007 at 5:11:00 PM

Comments 1 - 9 of 9 

Have more to say?
Become a Content Producer on AC