A Satire of the Abortion Ban in South Dakota

The Menstruation Ban Trilogy

By Julie Esris, published Jul 26, 2006
Published Content: 7  Total Views: 1,503  Favorited By: 0 CPs
Rating: 3.3 of 5
This is satire only and any names or resemblance to any real person, living or dead, except for Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell, is coincidental and unintentional.

MENSTRUATING WOMEN CAN BE CHARGED WITH MURDER

(Sioux Falls, SD)

April 12th, 2011


Following the introduction of a new law passed last month, in South Dakota, outlawing menstruation on the basis that it "kills innocent babies," all South Dakota women were ordered to have sexual relations with their husbands, boyfriends, or male friends/acquaintances, or go to sperm banks to ensure fertilization of their next egg to be released. Failure to do so could result in a fine of up to $100,000 plus up to 45 years in prison.

"So many eggs... that have the potential to become human beings, are being flushed down the toilet or absorbed in sanitary napkins every month," said recently elected South Dakota Governor, Jerry Falwell. "It disgusts me that so many babies are being killed every month. Imagine that your 25-year-old daughter has been getting her period for 14 years. That's 168 babies - at least, assuming that only one egg was released per month - being tragically killed. This cannot go on. God will not stand for it. In fact, His purpose for making women menstruate is so they can see the blood of these poor babies being passed into the toilet."

South Dakota women were given a month in which to get their latest egg or eggs fertilized, or face murder charges.

"A month is more than ample time," said Falwell. "If you can't find a way to fertilize that egg in that amount of time, then you're a murderer - plain and simple."

The passing of the new law was met with outrage when pro-choice groups demanded to know why their daughters, some as young as ten, had to get pregnant.

"I don't want my ten-year-old daughter to have to get pregnant already," said a Sioux Falls mother, whose daughter just got her first period in February. "No kid that age should have to carry a baby around for nine months. It's bad enough this new law will require her to do it every year until menopause."

Takeaways
  • How is this satire relevant in today's world?
  • Do you think this could actually happen? Why or why not?
  • Even if it couldn't happen, why is this satire still important?
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
 
Very good... I dug you.

Posted on 05/09/2007 at 2:05:00 AM

 
OMG! This is so funny! Why isn't it on the front page or was it, and I missed it?

Posted on 02/15/2007 at 4:02:00 PM

 
I trust you'll be writing a 'fashion' piece on head ware apparel of the religious right. I'm sure the fashionistas must have an opinion on the wearing of white turbans after Labor Day. [pun intended!!]

Posted on 09/06/2006 at 12:09:00 PM

 
Very good satire, it helps show the idiocrity of the far right...

Posted on 07/30/2006 at 12:07:00 PM

 
Excellent satire. Nice use of the newspaper style. Enjoyed it.

Posted on 07/27/2006 at 9:07:00 AM

 
Very imaginative. You might want to be careful throwing around the Lord's name like that. He will be coming back, you know. :o)

Posted on 07/26/2006 at 11:07:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
Most Commented On