Find » Lifestyle » Food & Wine » Eating in Vs. Dining Out: Which is ...

Eating in Vs. Dining Out: Which is Cheaper?

By Jeff Gorman, published Dec 01, 2007
Published Content: 170  Total Views: 200,053  Favorited By: 37 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.1 of 5
I just read a story online called "Is eating out cheaper than eating in?" While the article tried to make the point that dining at restaurants can actually save you money, it certainly didn't convince me.

The story begins with a man buying organic vegetables and cooking them for dinner. Including the cost of his time, he figures he has spent $30. He goes on to say he could have had a good restaurant meal for $17 plus tip.

It stated that a lady was outraged because a package of chicken cost her $8! Eight dollars made you outraged? Well how many pieces of chicken did you receive for that $8, was it 4, 6, 8 or even 10? Funny how it failed to mention the quantity. Go to your favorite sit down resturant and order a chicken meal. How many pieces of chicken will you receive for that meal? Perhaps 2 or 3 at the very best of my guess.

How much will that meal cost you then? So you pay $12 for a chicken meal at a resturant and maybe you get a left over meal out of it. Ok so now you've gotten 2 meals for $12 not including tip. Well that $8 chicken package could at least given you 4 meals. I'll leave the math up to you, the experts. My checkbook; however, states that buying that $8 chicken doesn't look so outrageous.

This argument has a few flaws. First of all, if you're worried about saving money, then you probably can't afford organic food. Also, the diner doesn't factor in the time to wait for a table and for the food to arrive then waiting again to get your check.

The article says "time-strapped workers are abandoning the kitchen in droves." I still don't see how eating at a restaurant saves time, unless you're talking about McDonald's and that's walking in and not sitting through the drive thru wait.

My family and I have found that we really save money when we avoid eating at restaurants whenever we can. It's no fun to plan ahead and pack a bunch of sandwiches and fruit, but it has been very cost-effective.

That way, when it is time to eat at a restaurant for a birthday or anniversary, the food and atmosphere are always fantastic. That's because eating out is a special treat, just like when we were kids.

Comments
Comments 1 - 8 of 8
 
 
I think is just stupid,to eat outside almost daily . depends on how much you know about cooking and stuff.it is cheaper to do it yourself ...has always benn that way

Posted on 07/01/2008 at 1:07:21 PM

 
You are so right! People eat out way too much these days. I personally pack a lunch every day for work. It saves me money!

Posted on 05/06/2008 at 1:05:01 PM

 
Jeff, I look forward to your article. I, too, found the other article flawed.

Posted on 03/07/2008 at 9:03:06 PM

 
Giant Eagle is expensive, but it's still cheaper than eating out all the time. I don't understand how people can eat out in restaurants like 3-4 times per week. excellent article!!

Posted on 02/02/2008 at 4:02:36 PM

 
You've made some great points. Eating out isn't cheaper in all cases, but in some it can be. I like peel and eat shrimp, fried shrimp, and some of the other more expensive foods served at my local Oriental buffet restaurant. The prices can't be beat in that type of restaurant. For $7.00 I can have the shrimp and other choices I love but otherwise couldn't afford to buy from the store. I think it just depends on what you want, how large your family is, how far you are from civilization, and the type of restaurant. Buffets can be a great way to enjoy foods you otherwise couldn't afford to buy and make yourself. The type of restaurants and food in that article you mentioned are definitely more expensive than eating at home.

Posted on 12/22/2007 at 4:12:12 PM

 
Excellent article. I also noticed the price of gas wasn't factored in ;-)

Posted on 12/02/2007 at 12:12:00 PM

 
Great article and I would agree that for a family, it indeed would be a better choice to shop with a budget in mind and eat at home. But for older diners with senior discounts, or the one living alone, I would have to agree that the expense (weighing cooking time, shopping time, grocery prices, cleaning up) would be less to just eat out.

Posted on 12/02/2007 at 8:12:00 AM

 
Good ideas.

Posted on 12/01/2007 at 8:12:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 8 of 8
 
Advertisment