Evolution, Conservation, and Environmentalism: Logical Contradictions
They Really Just Don't Add Up
By Adam Willard, published Dec 03, 2007
Published Content: 78 Total Views: 130,887 Favorited By: 20 CPs
Let's start with evolution. We all know the kindergarten version: Mankind evolved from apes, or further back, all life evolved from a primordial soup (billions or at least hundreds of millions of years ago). The details get quite a bit more complex, but nonetheless that's a quick summary that's sufficient to explain the overall results.
On the purely physical side, the theory of evolution states that small changes over time eventually create new species, new genera, and new families of life. We now understand that the "changes" which Darwin first included in his view of evolution take place on a molecular level. Strings of DNA get flip-flopped, duplicated, mutated, or anything else that results in changes to the genes of a creature.
Those genetic changes aren't always obvious, are often benign, frequently harmful, and occasionally beneficial. If the creature in which the changes occurred survives, he'll likely pass on those changes to his offspring. In turn, if they survive (or reproduce rapidly), they'll likely pass on the same change and eventually what was once a random mutation will become the accepted norm. If you accumulate enough changes, you'll eventually get an entirely new creature that can't even cross-breed with its predecessor. Voila: evolution!
Well, another aspect of evolution says that this works because in any given environment, creatures are fighting for control and consumption of needed resources. In a very complex ecosystem, this has all been balanced out and (according to Darwinism) the strongest competitor has survived to control and maintain the resources in its own little niche. Weak species, those whose eventual genetic mutations weren't beneficial enough to survive and sufficiently propagate, are slowly weeded out of the gene pool and replaced by stronger competition.
Evolution, Conservation, and Environmentalism: Logical Contradictions
You may also like...
- Evolution Vs. Creation
- Evolution of the Art Deco Movement
- Can Evolution and the Bible Co-Exist?
- Evolution of the Generations
- Evolution Vs. The "Observations of Moses"
- Creation Science and Intelligent Design
- Five Rational Reasons Why Darwin's Evolution is Doubtful
- The Theory of Evolution and What's Wrong with the Arguments Against it
- Evolution of Dance Video Craze!!
- Creation Museum Set to Open May 28th, 2007
Takeaways
- Evolution's primary goals are the survival of a species.
- So why are evolutionists trying to conserve failed evolutionary processes?
- Theistic "stewardship" provides a perfectly reasonable basis for environmentalism and conservation.
Did You Know?
Tens of thousands of tax dollars are spent trying to preserve a single species of cave fish whose population is only 40-50 and live in only one pool and who contribute nothing but curiosity to humanity.
Most Commented On


Laurel1nd
Add a Comment
Posted on 03/09/2008 at 2:03:39 PM
Laurel1nd
Add a Comment
Posted on 03/09/2008 at 2:03:22 PM
Laurel1nd
Add a Comment
Posted on 03/09/2008 at 2:03:51 PM
John Estes
Add a Comment
Posted on 02/05/2008 at 7:02:21 PM
Ignorance is not bliss
Add a Comment
Posted on 01/10/2008 at 11:01:02 PM
MrCopilot
Add a Comment
Posted on 01/09/2008 at 3:01:58 AM
MrCopilot
Add a Comment
Posted on 01/09/2008 at 3:01:05 AM
Marion Ravenwood
Add a Comment
Posted on 01/09/2008 at 12:01:48 AM
Smorg
Add a Comment
Posted on 01/07/2008 at 1:01:55 PM
Charlotte Kuchinsky
Add a Comment
Posted on 12/10/2007 at 3:12:15 PM
cathiesbloggs
Add a Comment
Posted on 12/06/2007 at 11:12:00 AM
Norman A. Rubin
Add a Comment
Posted on 12/06/2007 at 1:12:00 AM
mentil
Add a Comment
Posted on 12/04/2007 at 11:12:00 PM
Nikki
Add a Comment
Posted on 12/04/2007 at 9:12:00 AM
Kim Linton
Add a Comment
Posted on 12/03/2007 at 7:12:00 PM