CNN/YouTube Republican Debate: A Question-by-Question Analysis

Overview and Summary

Over 4,900 video questions were submitted to YouTube for the November 28 CNN/YouTube Republican Debate. Of those, one song and 32 questions made the cut to be presented to the candidates. Not every
CNN/YouTube Republican Debate: A Question-by-Question Analysis
Date: November 28, 2007
 candidate answered every question. The candidates involved in the debate, in alphabetical order, are: Rudy Guilliani, Mike Huckabee, Rep. Duncan Hunter, Sen. John McCain, Rep. Ron Paul, Mitt Romney, Rep. TomTancredo, and Fred Thompson. The debate moderator was CNN's Anderson Cooper.

Key Issues

Though many issues were addressed in this debate, the key ones were immigration, abortion, the war in Iraq, and gun control. A few of the other topics presented were religion, the national debt, and baseball.

Below is a review of the key issues, as well as the questions asked pertaining to each. Each topic is accompanied by an overview of each question with analysis as to how each respondent handled the question. For each topic, a 'winner' is declared. All winners of topics and questions are noted in bold. For the purpose of brevity, each candidate will be referred to by last name only.

Key Issue #1: Immigration

"Will you make America a 'sanctuary city' country?"

Respondents: Giuliani and Romney

Result: They both had moments of smooth talking, and moments of embarrassment. Romney kept his cool better than Giuliani who was visibly upset by Romney calling him on the carpet about his claims. Romney wins this question by a nose, but only because his facts against Giuliani were actually fact, while Giuliani twisted the facts to try to gain points over Romney. People who do that appear desperate, which does not bode well for voter confidence.

"Will you pledge to veto amnesty for illegal immigrants?"

Respondents: Guiliani, McCain, Tancredo, and Thompson

Related information
  • Over 4900 video questions were submitted but only 32 plus one song were used.
 
Comments 1 - 10 of 11 Next >>
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

This was back when the process was fun! Sorry I missed this and hope it got some attention...excellent work.

Posted on 07/30/2008 at 6:07:47 PM

Watching the Republican debate in California as they take a break, Anderson Cooper is being very unfair with the time for Ron Paul. He is cutting him off short and not allowing him to even get close to equal time to have his voice heard.

Posted on 01/30/2008 at 8:01:01 PM

thats the problem with the poison of socialism Lily, once expanded it can never contract, it usually takes a violent revolution to do so.

Posted on 12/10/2007 at 2:12:16 PM

Well when you run your campaign as a conspiracy theorist, you're going to get conspiracy theory questions.

Posted on 11/29/2007 at 11:11:00 PM

Whomever gave Daniella a one-star rating is a total moron. She did an excellent job with this. I gave her a five-star to get her back to the starting point at 3.0.

Posted on 11/29/2007 at 9:11:00 PM

I didn't see the GOP (yet) but saw the Dems last summer. Indeed, Cooper was unfair with the balance of time among the candidates. Plus the whole concept is bogus; it's supposed to be "real questions from real people," but the established media still screens them, so we still end up with the same questions that the media would ask.

Posted on 11/29/2007 at 9:11:00 PM

An interesting after-debate note from CNN's Anderson Cooper involving something from the debate may be viewed here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28CCf4cEDpI&feature=bz302

Posted on 11/29/2007 at 9:11:00 PM

...you know you won't win? Imagine for one moment that YOUR candidate was treated with such scorn...and then you have to listen to someone tell you he needs to brush up on his "debate skills." To call these biased "soundbite" fights a debate is to insult the true meaning of the word.

Posted on 11/29/2007 at 3:11:00 PM

I think it could have been a good breakdown of the event...if it was inclusive of all of the questions. But...I fear that would have emphasized Romney's weaknesses too much for the writer to bear. On a separate note, as a Ron Paul supporter, I take exception to your obvious distain for him. Unfortunately for you it tarnished what could have been a decent article. McCain decided to jump ship and attack Ron Paul...likely because his campaign feels Paul is eating into his NH numbers. I also noticed you didn't mention how biased CNN was both with time allotted...and also the types of questions used. Seriously...did you even notice that Ron Paul stood for 35 minutes before being allowed to speak...and then was asked a conspiracy question (which he handled nicely btw...but did you notice that no other candidate had to answer it?). What were the other two directed to him? Something about punishing a woman if abortions become illegal...and will you run as a 3rd party candidate because

Posted on 11/29/2007 at 3:11:00 PM

Very good breakdown of the debate!

Posted on 11/29/2007 at 1:11:00 PM

Comments 1 - 10 of 11 Next >>