Another Sad Day in Mets History: Club Trades Milledge for Spare Parts

By Brian Joura, published Nov 30, 2007
Published Content: 295  Total Views: 144,414  Favorited By: 40 CPs
Rating: 4.7 of 5
A little while back, ESPN ran a commercial where the "star" was a blanket with a Cardinals logo on it. We got to see the blanket and its owner grow up through the years and the different ways it was used. It started off as the blanket of a youngster being pulled in a red wagon and the commercial ended with the boy as a grown man, pulling his son in a red wagon with the same blanket. I don't remember the exact tagline, but basically it said something along the lines of - without sports, what else do we have to hold on to?

I grew up in New York, although I haven't lived there in 25 years. However, I still live and die with the Mets and the Knicks. If nothing else, you can't accuse me of being a front-runner.

Management of both teams have made it really difficult to keep the faith. There's the whole Isiah Thomas running the Knicks into the ground and that's on top of the epic collapse by the Mets last September.

But it just got worse.

The Mets just traded one of their up-and-coming stars, Lastings Milledge, for a bag of broken bats and a pop-up toaster. Actually, it's not quite that bad. Ryan Church is a pretty decent player. But he is considerably older than Milledge and has none of the upside. And Brian Schneider is a top-notch defensive catcher who can no longer hit.

I don't think even the Bush White House could put a spin on this trade that would make it seem halfway reasonable. Let's look at the pros and cons of the deal from the Mets' point of view.

Pros
Schneider and Castro will make a good catching tandem
Church is a good defender and is very good against RHP

Cons
Mets gave up the best player in the deal
Mets took on more salary
Mets traded future star to division rival
We can now add Milledge's name to Otis, Singleton, Ryan, Seaver and Kazmir as players the Mets traded and got pennies on the dollar in exchange.

Takeaways
  • There are no highlights to this deal.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 9 of 9
 
 
I loved the headline too.

Posted on 12/05/2007 at 4:12:00 PM

 
I'd be quite willing to bet that Milledge ends up with better offensive numbers than Sandberg. Won't mean he's a better player, due to differences in 2B and OF, but better offensive numbers.

Posted on 12/04/2007 at 9:12:00 AM

 
At least the Mets didn't trade Ryne Sandberg.

Posted on 12/01/2007 at 8:12:00 PM

 
unfortunately, i think youre right. im just disgustingly optimistic. another long summer for us, sir. oy vey.

Posted on 12/01/2007 at 3:12:00 PM

 
I thought Milledge was supposed to be part of a trade package for Johan Santana??? Willie Randolph learned the inability to trust and utilize young players from Joe Torre, which is one reason I rejoiced when Torre left. Don't congratulate the DC fans (all 8 of them) because they will only get to watch Milledge play for a few seasons and then the Nationals will bolt like all the DC teams before them. Football is king in that region and there is no room to support a bad baseball team.

Posted on 11/30/2007 at 9:11:00 PM

 
I just love your titles Brian and yes the Bush comment was charming.

Posted on 11/30/2007 at 3:11:00 PM

 
The A's already have Nick Swisher and Travis Buck - what are they going to do with both Church AND Gomez? And I think dealing LM means that Gomez is not going anywhere.

Posted on 11/30/2007 at 1:11:00 PM

 
I'm not hating this move because of this reason: the A's didn't want Milledge (who can blame them) so they trade him for church and then package gomez, church, pelfry and estrada for Haren.

Posted on 11/30/2007 at 1:11:00 PM

 
Love the headline and the Bush White House commentary.

Posted on 11/30/2007 at 1:11:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 9 of 9
 
Most Commented On