Israel Had No Choice but to Go to War with Hezbollah

Use of Force Needed to Keep Israelis Safe from Attack

By Brad Kurtzberg, published Jul 29, 2006
Published Content: 8  Total Views: 5,840  Favorited By: 0 CPs
Rating: 3.6 of 5
The Israeli government's decision to attack Hezbollah guerillas in Lebanon was the correct move. In fact, Israel had little choice in the matter. The government in Jerusalem was blatantly attacked within Israeli territory by the a militant group bent on Israel's destruction. In order to protect its citizens, Israel had to go to war.

The bottom line is that Islamic militant groups like Hezbollah and Hamas do not recognize Israel's right to exist. The question is not one of giving back territory captured in Israel's overwhelming victory in the Six Day War in 1967. To Hezbollah and Hamas, Tel Aviv is "occupied territory" just as much as the Nablus or Sheba Farms.

Need proof? Look at Israel's withdrawal from it's the security zone in southern Lebanon six years ago. Hezbollah has claimed that Sheba Farms is still "occupied" in order to justify its continued attacks on Israel. The United Nations says the disputed territory is not part of Lebanon but Hezbollah attacks against Israel continued.

Fighting had been limited to rockets fired at Israelis in Sheba Farms and a tacit, unspoken agreement came into being to maintain the status quo. However, the recent abduction of Israeli soldiers that instigated the recent conflict was done within Israel's pre-1967 borders. It is clear that Hezbollah, like its patron, Iran, wants Israel wiped off the map.

Hamas in the Gaza Strip showed similar intent. Israel unilaterally withdrew from Gaza last summer under the guidance of Ariel Sharon. Jewish communities were uprooted and handed over to the Palestinians. Instead of emphasizing the building of a new state, the Palestinians used the Gaza Strip to launch rockets into southern Israeli towns and cities. The attacks were directed at civilians within Israel's pre-1967 borders. They were continuous almost from the day the pullback was completed.

Israel Had No Choice but to Go to War with Hezbollah
Israel Had No Choice but to Go to War with Hezbollah

Isreali tank

Credit: Associated Content

Copyright: Associated Content

Takeaways
  • Hezbollah Is Supported by Iran and Syria
  • They refuse to recognize Israel's right to exist
  • Israel must defend its citizens from attacks by terrorists.
Did You Know?
Israeli withdrawals from Lebanon and Gaza have increased and not reduced attacks my militant groups like Hezbollah and Hamas.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 26
Next >>
 
I still don't get the whole idea of a Palestinian state. Why doesn't Jordan want the West Bank back? Why doesn't Egypt want Gaza back? What do they know that we don't?

Posted on 08/12/2006 at 11:08:00 AM

 
By the way--I am very happy that Americans are starting to more often debate our role in this mess--It's been a long time coming and is crucial in getting to resolving our own Middle East demons

Posted on 08/11/2006 at 11:08:00 AM

 
Also, as far as negotiations go. Under international law, Israel is not entitled to retain ANY of the occupied territories since they were aquired through warfare, and would be required to allow EVERY SINGLE refugee the right of return, among other things. Therefore, Israel was not and has not offered anything to the Palestinians, rather, teh Palestinians have made all the concessions. For instance, they agreed to have only a portion of the refugees the right of return rather than all, which they would be entitled to under intl law. Again this is the truth, not the whitewashed "Israel offered 90%" argument--So, as I said--Israel should realize that teh only way to peace is to offer a viable Palestinian state.

Posted on 08/11/2006 at 11:08:00 AM

 
Greg--The offer at Camp David was full of non-starters having to do with the "right of return", as well as various sovereignty issues--Israel insisted on maintaining strategic control of airspace and water. Also, the Palestinian state under the Camp David offer would consist of bantustan style Palestinian enclave crisscrossed by roads only to be used by Israel. This would not have been a viable Palestinian state and is an offer that any leader would have turned down. That is the real story.

Posted on 08/11/2006 at 11:08:00 AM

 
very good article but i do not agree with your comments

Posted on 08/10/2006 at 9:08:00 AM

 
Brad, I just wanted to add (from a style aspect), your research & facts are fine, but I would have liked to have seen more of some opinion & conclusion with those facts. It's kind of a grocery list. The last sentence didn't tie it up for me. It would have worked better for me if you had injected some more of yourself into the article. (HTH)

Posted on 08/10/2006 at 8:08:00 AM

 
Content & style: Low marks. I agree with some earlier comments that this is written like right-wing talking points. As for opinion on the topic: It's time for the U.S. to just step out. We were there in the '80s and BOOM!. My father was there in the '50s and, well...we just can't help the situation. The 1000 character comment section is too short for a proper reply. Maybe "to the victor go the spoils" is the correct answer here. Civilians are being killed on both sides. This is as much a media war as a bullet war.

Posted on 08/09/2006 at 9:08:00 PM

 
(sorry, got cut off) it's human nature to maim and kill, at least from my POV.

Posted on 08/09/2006 at 5:08:00 PM

 
Next, let's take a look at Lebanon (or Syria, or Jordan, basically countries around Israel). Full of Islamic fundamentalists. NOW NOT ALL MUSLIMS ARE ISLAMIC RADICALS. The radicals just have the loudest voices, the biggest guns, and are determined to blow themselves and any non-Muslims away. This radical Islam gained popularity around the time of the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. In addition to Pakistan, both the U.S. and Saudi Arabia funded the Mujahedin to attack Soviet forces in Afghanistan. As a result, billions of dollars were pumped into Radical Islam's coffers, that includes Syria, Iran, Iraq. Basically Radical Islam grew up initially through U.S. nuturing (money, camps etc.) and now it is out of control. It is exacerbated by the fact (at least in this case) that Israelis are fiercely protective of their land and their people. With neither side willing to back down, people are dying needlessly. THAT is the root cause. Or if you want to get to the basics, it's human nature

Posted on 08/09/2006 at 5:08:00 PM

 
Greg, that's not the root cause and I'm surprised you don't see it. Let's take a step back for a moment and look in. We see on one side Israel. Surrounded on almost all sides by hostile forces, Israel wisely got support from the United States. Aside from European allies, Israel was the only country allowed to purchase F-16 fighter jets (until very recently). Furthermore since Israel has been at perpetual war for basically its entire existance, AND has solid financial footing, they are prepared. The bomb shelters in almost every home (I'm not sure, I'm going off someone else's info here) reduce casualties on the Israeli side. (cont. above)

Posted on 08/09/2006 at 5:08:00 PM

 
Boy this article is going to get a lot of attention. People may think that this article is one sided but I should point out that it is in the "OPINION/EDITORAL" section of AC.

Posted on 08/09/2006 at 4:08:00 PM

 
Stephanie, Don't forget that this all started when Hezbollah violated an international boundary and ambushed Israeli soldiers, killing 8 and kidnapping 2 more. Proportionality aside, that is the root cause of what is happening in Lebanon now.

Posted on 08/09/2006 at 11:08:00 AM

 
I wish Associated Content was not promoting such one-sided, warmongering propaganda.

Posted on 08/09/2006 at 10:08:00 AM

 
u are one sided..how about the thousands of palestinian refugees in their own land..? u never mention israel occupying their land..? israel's way of terrosim is different, it is sort of camoflaged.they kill palestinian civilains but claim that they have killed terrorists(how can every single palestinian be a terrorist?), impose restrictions on their movement and force them to live in ghettos. israel has right to exist and has right to defend itself but that does not mean we have to put up with them killing palestinian civilians and starving the whole population.

Posted on 08/09/2006 at 7:08:00 AM

 
I don't even know where to begin. How is it that everyone forgets that Israel "occupies" lands as a result of having to defend itself from attacks from those lands? Israel's last incursion into Lebanon was a result of attacks on Israel. Further, I love the comment about the two soldiers. Sounds like a quote from someone who has never worn the uniform. If not two, then what's the magic number? Appropriated and ethnicall cleansed areas? How about areas seized in war after Israel was attacked by its Arab neighbors? It's not like they just decided one day to take them. And Paul, a viable solution? Like the one offered to Arafat at Camp David that gave him 90% of what he was asking for? Usually two sides start with their positions and find some middle ground. He was offered 90% of his demands, including a Palestinian state with control of half of Jerusalem! What did he do? Walked away and started yet another intifadah. There is no negotiation with people who call for your destruction.

Posted on 08/09/2006 at 5:08:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 26
Next >>
Most Commented On