Agents Ramos and Compean's Appeal is Heard
Today, December 03, 2007 the appeal for former U.S. Border Patrol Agents Ramos and Compean was scheduled to be heard at 9:00 am at the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans, Louisiana.
The encouraging news is that Judge E. Grady Jolly, one of three Appellate judges stated that federal prosecutors "may have overreacted in their case against" Ramos and Compean. Jolly questioned Assistant U.S. Attorney Mark Steimach saying, "It does
seem
to me that the government overreacted here."
To the casual observer these agents should have never been arrested in the first place. The Western Texas U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton apparently engaged in some very questionable practices in bringing forth the prosecution. Sutton's team heavily relied on procedural violations by the agents after the attempted arrest and shooting of the drug smuggler, illegal criminal alien Osvaldo Alrete-Davila. There is precedent, namely United States v. Christo, in which the court held that criminal convictions based upon civil violations constituted plain error. Due process will be challenged. There are other nefarious actions by Sutton and his office, such as withholding details that would have shown Davila was not an innocent migrant humbly trying to enter the U.S. to better his life.
The encouraging news is that Judge E. Grady Jolly, one of three Appellate judges stated that federal prosecutors "may have overreacted in their case against" Ramos and Compean. Jolly questioned Assistant U.S. Attorney Mark Steimach saying, "It does
to me that the government overreacted here."
To the casual observer these agents should have never been arrested in the first place. The Western Texas U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton apparently engaged in some very questionable practices in bringing forth the prosecution. Sutton's team heavily relied on procedural violations by the agents after the attempted arrest and shooting of the drug smuggler, illegal criminal alien Osvaldo Alrete-Davila. There is precedent, namely United States v. Christo, in which the court held that criminal convictions based upon civil violations constituted plain error. Due process will be challenged. There are other nefarious actions by Sutton and his office, such as withholding details that would have shown Davila was not an innocent migrant humbly trying to enter the U.S. to better his life.
Most Comments Today
- Michael Jackson is Missing The casket is missing, where is it? How did it disappear? 31 Comments
- Oh No! Michael Jackson's Body and Brain Missing Is Michael Jackson's body and brain missing? According to many websites they... 31 Comments
- Sarah Palin 2012? Sarah Palin 2012? 29 Comments
- Hot News Quickies - Thursday, July 9, 2009 News happens while you sleep - get your Hot News Quickies here! 28 Comments
- Real Estate: Renting Your Home and Bad Tenants If you decide to rent out your home, do a thorough reference check with previ... 26 Comments
- Every Day Heroes At every disaster, in every community, when people are hurting who are the fi... 24 Comments










Kristie Leong M.D.
Posted on 02/06/2008 at 9:02:07 AM
3lilangels
Posted on 01/23/2008 at 1:01:44 PM
handlingthetruth
Posted on 12/21/2007 at 9:12:05 AM
Lenora Murdock
Posted on 12/10/2007 at 4:12:33 PM
H.Rox
Posted on 12/09/2007 at 8:12:43 PM
Beth Callahan
Posted on 12/09/2007 at 2:12:41 PM
Justice Lives Not
Posted on 12/07/2007 at 6:12:00 PM
2buzy
Posted on 12/05/2007 at 10:12:00 PM
Donna Porter
Posted on 12/05/2007 at 9:12:00 PM
Tony Vega
Posted on 12/04/2007 at 6:12:00 AM