Daniel Craig: The New James Bond, 007

Daniel Craig Will Leave Audiences Shaken and Stirred, but in a Good Way

By James Hanna, published Aug 10, 2006
Published Content: 41  Total Views: 40,394  Favorited By: 1 CPs
Rating: 2.9 of 5


Ian Fleming created the penultimate secret agent, James Bond, in Casino Royale in 1953 to moderate acclaim. The following adventures were eagerly gobbled up by a fascinated audience. Still, that same audience yearned for more and in 1962, thanks to EON Productions, it got what it wanted. Sean Connery was branded into the public eye as James Bond- 007. From Dr. No onward, each James Bond film was waited for with baited breath.

Unfortunately in latter years, despite box office returns, James Bond has become less about escapist fun and more about gags and gadgets and the audience has voiced its disappointment. Pierce Brosnan was always just a good James Bond and would always be, even if he had had better material. The heirs to the original production team at EON Productions noticed this and went back to the drawing board. Pierce Brosnan was given the axe, making him the first James Bond actor to officially be canned by the producers instead of bowing out himself. EON Productions second act of rebirth was to bring Ian Fleming's first novel, Casino Royale, to the big screen.

Casino Royale had been seen by audiences twice before. In the 1950s, Barry Nelson took on the role of "Card Smart Jimmy Bond" for a live television performance. Then again in 1967 with David Niven, Peter Sellers, Woody Allen and a slew of others playing "James Bond" in the non-hilarious spoof of James Bond, Casino Royale. Both films are interesting, the former being the better of the two thanks to the decision to stay close to the source material, but they're not the James Bond fans know. This is the absolute first time fans will get to see Casino Royale nearly the way Ian Fleming intended. With all of this accomplished, EON Productions had one more hurtle to leap: the casting of a new James Bond.

Takeaways
  • Sean Connery was branded into the public eye as James Bond- 007.
  • Daniel Craig brings to the role the sort of edginess that exists only in the Fleming novels.
  • Craig's a superior actor; he is probably the most skilled actor ever to play James Bond.
Did You Know?
While the early James Bond films used many of Ian Fleming's titles, only a handful were actually faithful to the source material. This Casino Royale is also the first time since The Living Daylights that an Ian Fleming novel has been used as the source material. Licence to Kill through Die Another Day were all original stories.
Resources
  • Fans and general movie watchers are invited to watch the status of Daniel Craig as James Bond by visiting a couple of websites. www.casinoroyalemovie.com (the official movie site); www.mi6.co.uk (a fan site, but the second most reliable after the official site). For those who are interested in seeing why some people do not like Daniel Craig as James Bond, they can go to www.craigsnotbond.com.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
 
["Craig's a superior actor; he is probably the most skilled actor ever to play James Bond."] Um, don't you think you're going just a bit too far? Granted, I have nothing against Craig as 007. I've seen the trailers and I think he's marvelous. However . . . I feel that Connery, Dalton and Brosnan are all excellent actors. Moore is a good actor, when he's not being lazy. And for a male model, Lazenby did a damn good job in OHMSS. As for Craig bringing the literary edge to the Bond role . . . Dalton had already done that in TLD and LTK. However, I do like an edgy Bond . . . or a slightly macho Bond . . . or a humorous Bond . . . or any kind of Bond. As long as the actor brings his own interpretation to the role and not try to copy someone else.

Posted on 11/14/2006 at 4:11:00 PM

 
'Baited breath'? Sheesh.

Posted on 08/11/2006 at 7:08:00 AM

 
Pierce is a proven talent. Taunting girl is mean. EON will lose this time in the market where the measure of things is the talent :)

Posted on 08/11/2006 at 5:08:00 AM

 
Wait and see... James Bond: Reset... no more gadget, no more silly jokes... cant wait for the release in november

Posted on 08/10/2006 at 12:08:00 PM

 
Ha! A superior actor? Not from what I've seen! Not that ugly? Oh, yes he is. He's no James Bond. They made a mistake casting this guy. I have no desire to pay any money to see him on screen.

Posted on 08/10/2006 at 11:08:00 AM

 
Have you even seen The Matador? Believe me, Mr Brosnan can act and to a majority of fans was the definitive James Bond. Brosnan was fired because he had the temerity to ask for a percentage of the films profits...something the Brocolis never like. I personally don't think the general Bond going fan likes an edgy Bond...think back to Timothy Dalton.

Posted on 08/10/2006 at 10:08:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
Most Commented On