Find » Education » Nuh-uh! Homeschoolers Are Too Socia...

Nuh-uh! Homeschoolers Are Too Socialized!

Arguments Against the Argument that Homeschoolers Are Not Socialized

By A. Hermitt, published Aug 07, 2006
Published Content: 1,174  Total Views: 1,672,826  Favorited By: 102 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.6 of 5
I read and answer homeschool board questions hoping I can help some parents interested in homeschooling make a decision or to give them information. Each and everyone of their questions are bombarded with claims of homeschooled students being socially inept and un-socialized.


The basic question “Should I homeschool” is answered with nonsense like:

“Home school? Heck nooooooooooo. These kids are very withdrawn and not very social. They need to be around others, other than mommy and daddy all day long”.

This answer comes from a place of ignorance. This is the standard stereotypical response of people who are anti homeschooler. They feel that homeschoolers are isolated and anti social. If they spent a day in the life of a homeschooler, they would surely know differently.

“Let me say that if you homeschool your child , Your child will get rejected from other kids and they will attack him and put him down for he does not attend the local public school. Your child might become a withdrawn wimp. Let the child go to public school and have some damm friends in life.”

Firstly, let us look at the spelling, grammar and need to be vulgar in this answer. (If you are going to swear, at least spell it right). This answer is typical of someone who was “socialized” through public schools. They are overly aggressive. Their answer is dismissive, and they illustrate the kind of behavior that homeschooler would not want their kids to emulate.




“Kids need to be social at a young age and you can teach her things that the schools don't as I do. My kids are in public schools and I spend summers and after school teaching them the stuff that their school doesn't.”

This person unintentionally gives a good argument for homeschooling. They essentially admit that the child is not in school to learn but to socialize. They teach the child themselves. Instead of wasting the child’s time in school, this person could instead have the child attend classes that excite them like ballet, science labs, even acting! There are certainly better ways to socialize than to go to school.

Nuh-uh! Homeschoolers Are Too Socialized!

public school is not the only place to learn self defense and problem resolution.

Credit: stockxpert

Copyright: stockxpert

Takeaways
  • Public school advocates should get to know a few homeschoolers before condemning them
  • Public school socialization is not necessarily good socialization.
  • Sometimes an argument for public school is a better argument for homeschool.
Did You Know?
These days homeschoolers find themselves having to turn down socialization opportunities in order to make time to learn.
Resources
  • article inspired by the Yahoo Answers boards. ; See questions I have answered on homeschool and other subjects... membername ahermitt
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 5 of 5
 
 
Again as a person who was homeschooled I am amused also at people's general idea about what it means to be socialized. I've been out of school for quite a while now and know that homeschooling has improved a lot since I was there. Yet, I never felt even that long ago that we lacked in that area. Not only did we get together with other kids that were homeschooled numerous times a week, we also had Co-op( which is for extra courses that might be harder to do at home)where we met and interacted with people of different races, religions, etc, and I also had neighbor friends that I played with. My friends that went to public school always thought it was cool that I was homeschooled. I lead a happy, successful life and am comfortable in my own skin, which is more than I can say for most of my friends that weren't homeschooled.

Posted on 09/22/2007 at 12:09:00 PM

 
I think your concept of socialization conflicts with the prevailing idea of what it means to be socially functional. Profanity does not make one socially inept, just as avoiding its use doesn't necessarily make a person well adapted. Resorting to semantics - as you have - is a great distraction from the question. An observant person can pick out another's birth order with very little effort. It's also easy to spot children who had no siblings. People notice accents, and can easily identify what region a new acquaintance is from. Humans learn their place within the social hierarchy of family and community. However, without regular interaction, this process can be delayed. Neurologically, these learning paths are built from a very early age. They set the pattern for adaptations to changing social landscapes later in life. Depriving a child of this natural process can make them less socially agile. While social agility may be difficult to quantify, we're still able to assess

Posted on 09/18/2007 at 6:09:00 AM

 
Good points :)

Posted on 09/02/2007 at 11:09:00 AM

 
Great article!!!! My daughter is able to/will be able to participate in a huge amount of extracurrciulars that would simply not be possible if she "wasted" 7 hours in school all day.

Posted on 06/08/2007 at 11:06:00 AM

 
This is a very good article. I'm shocked to see no comments here. Great job. I just did an article called "The Most Common Misconception About Homeschool: Socialization". You might be interested.

Posted on 04/18/2007 at 1:04:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 5 of 5
 
Most Commented On