Find » Opinion/Editorial » Positives of No Child Left Behind

Positives of No Child Left Behind

Quit Complaining! These Changes Are for the Better!

By Patti, published Aug 06, 2006
Published Content: 6  Total Views: 0  Favorited By: 1 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 2.0 of 5


Usually I hear the No Child left Behind Act scowled upon in teacher’s lounges across the state or ridiculed by veteran educators. I may not know enough about the law itself to understand what all the negative attitudes are for, but I know that I had to take a lot of schooling and preparation to be able to teach these kids, and when I do get that job know that I am “highly qualified” and ready to perform to the best of my ability. I recently read an article from The Journal of School Health that discussed the “No Child Left Behind Act” (NCLB) in a positive way, proclaiming that it led to an increase not only in the academic achievements, but also increased their programs dealing with healthy social development and prevention. Numerous studies were conducted to predict academic achievement based on the child’s adolescent behavior. For example they followed students in the seventh grade until the tenth grade and found that the students with antisocial, emotional or delinquent behavior at that age, led to disruptive or defiant behavior in the classroom, physical and relational aggression, and early initiation of substance use in later years. 

The correlation between the young behavior patterns and the aged students was quite obvious. I, too, agree that students who use drugs, alcohol, cigarettes and practice other delinquent behavior would ultimately finish with lower grades and test scores, if they finish at all! With this said, the article showed schools had increased their bonding and peer pressure programs in order to meet NCLB standards. They feel that by focusing on the students social and emotional needs, everyone will benefit. 

Furthermore, not only are the teaching requirements harder, something that I have experience first hand, but the facilities themselves are feeling the pressure to help these students achieve higher standards. If this is what every teacher in America is so angry about, I am not sure I want to go into that teacher's lounge and associate with those negative attitudes.




Takeaways
  • Why are we complaining so much?
  • This is better for the children, which is the point of our job.
  • There are many teachers now highly qualified that would love to take your job if you don't want it
Did You Know?
In 2005, America's fourth graders posted the best reading and math scores in the test's history. For fourth graders in reading, there has been more progress in the last five years than in the previous 28 combined.
Resources
  • www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/education ; Fleming, Charles B., Haggerty, Kevin P., Catalano, Richard F., Harachi, Tracy W., Mazza, James J., & Gruman, Diana H. (Nov 2005)Do social and behavioral characteristics targeted by preventive interventions predict standardized test scores and grades?(academic achievement prediction). In Journal of School Health, 75, p342(8). Retrieved February 13, 2006.
Comments
Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
 
I agree with you that the school should not be penalized based soley on standarized tests. There are many other factors that contribute to it.

Posted on 08/10/2006 at 6:08:00 AM

 
I disagree. The No Child Left Behind Act is not about those so-called antisocial children. It is about whole schools. The people who are suffering aren't the single 'bad' children that aren't doing well in middle- and upper-class high schools. The people who are feeling it are the schools in lower-class and below poverty line schools, schools where the students are do not get help with their homework at school, where the children *start out* with an academic and social disadvantage. The No Child Left Behind Act removes funding from schools whose students do not do well on standardized tests. The argument is that it is the school's fault for not utilizing the money properly to educate its students. The truth, however, is often that the disadvantaged schools suffer because their students have a harder time with the tests. It is not the school's fault. Imagine this, two students from different backgrounds that are having a hard time in their algebra class. The first, from

Posted on 08/09/2006 at 6:08:00 PM

 
Good article, more teachers need to think like that.

Posted on 08/09/2006 at 5:08:00 PM

 
As a teacher of 10 years now and continuing to keep my certification current and be highly qualified and meet the demands of national and state standards, it is just as hard as the days I was in college preparing. The only difference is is that I too have lost the gung-ho attitude that I will be different and never be negative, there have been many times, mostly administrative that we have to deal with. Leave no child behind is the top of a gripe list with teachers because it doesn't focus on the real important aspects of what is going on with the students, for example their home life, parent support, prior history, language, culture, etc. The importance of each student's education in the underfunded, over-crowded classroom is put soley in the hands of the teacher. And if they are not succeding, it is our fault and the school and we fail as educators. There needs to be a lot more to it than that. I agree that some negativity could definitely be erased, but there are always grip

Posted on 08/07/2006 at 8:08:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
Advertisment