Theists Vs. Athesists

By Lauren Hobgood, published Dec 21, 2007
Published Content: 7  Total Views: 5,456  Favorited By: 0 CPs
Rating: 3.3 of 5
Here in the US, or even the world, we as people learn to accept and embrace one simple concept: we're different. Not only looks or languages, but rather, our personal beliefs.

Or lack thereof.

To consider it for a moment, there are truckloads of issues and standards of which we have become tolerant in others.

Vegetarian?
That's cool, man, we'll take the meat out of your dish.

Gay?
Fine with me; I respect your life choice.

Atheist?
...Leave.

Why is it that of all the things that we can handle in the world, atheism is completely and totally, in the full sense of the word, unacceptable? Is it because the meaning of the word "atheist" is misunderstood? Frankly, atheism is simply the opposite of theism. Some people seem to immediately interpret the meaning as "worships Satan", where in reality, an atheist doesn't believe in Satan. It is the definite disbelief in gods, deities, or other religious standards.

It seems to comes down to something bigger than misunderstanding the word. People understand atheism, and it's from said comprehension that hatred and fear spawns. It's almost as though the world is purposely living in denial and pushing away all who disagree. Could it be that the religious public as a whole is living in willful ignorance?

I can (and do) respect the belief in the presence of a god or greater being; it's not my intention to disclose my preferred theories. But when does it end? Somehow, despite the leaps and bounds achieved by modern science, it is honestly accepted that God is every bit as much of a truth as "this table is solid". It is, without doubt, a fact.

With all due respect, that is simply not true.

There is a line between respecting those beliefs and blatantly lying, and that is a line that I refuse to blur. There's nothing factual about religion. The entire basis of religion is blind faith. If you are questioning any piece of religious aspects, and there is undoubtedly plenty to question, your fellow believers will reassure you that you simply must believe. You must know within yourself that it is all real and true.

Takeaways
  • Theists are intolerant of atheists.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
 
I tip my hat to you, Lauren. While I think it is of paramount importance to keep one's imagination active and vibrant, it is foolish to believe one's own imaginary fancies, just as it is foolish to believe in figurative skybeings with light-spears that hate you if you eat meat on the wrong days. Think on! And may the flying spaghetti monster be with you always. :-D

Posted on 12/23/2007 at 10:12:50 AM

 
Thank you for your article, Lauren. I think if enough of us write articles about atheism, maybe we can get it to become more understood and accepted. Never give up your true beliefs! Check out my atheism article at http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/197958/an_atheist_in_the_closet.html .

Posted on 12/22/2007 at 4:12:45 PM

 
Well said Lauren. To partially answer one of your questions, Karl Marx hit the nail on the head when he called religion the "opiate of the masses." In other words, give me a fantasy I can live with-reality is just too stark for me. Thus, non-believers are a constant reminder to the religious that they have surrendered their common sense to a fantasy that makes them more comfortable. Additional benefits for "some religious people" are the ability to torture, lie, steal, philander, and/or abuse all week and get forgiven on Sunday.

Posted on 12/22/2007 at 9:12:54 AM

 
Lumping the U.S. in with the world is unfair to the world in this respect. Most developed nations are becoming less religious as science advances and people progress. The U.S. stands alone in moving backwards. Nations such as Norway and Finland have all but done away with religion. (Is it any coincidence that these two nations were determined by the U.N. to be the most livable in 2007? I think not.) Atheists need to be less tolerant of religious beliefs, which lead inevitably to corrupt and backwards public policy. It is NOT okay to teach children to believe in myth and superstition; in fact, it borders on child abuse. The U.S. population is regressing, and it's shameful. Until we embrace science and reason, we'll remain to the rest of the world, a laughingstock.

Posted on 12/21/2007 at 6:12:35 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
Most Commented On