They Believe: 9/11 Truthers Spin Shadowy Conspiracy Theories

Are They Crazy or What?

By nathan comp, published Aug 02, 2006
Published Content: 13  Total Views: 13,506  Favorited By: 1 CPs
Rating: 3.1 of 5


David Hammond is articulate, well-educated and seemingly thoughtful. He is also paranoid. And the harder he works to convince others that the U.S. government orchestrated the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, the more paranoid he becomes.

"Thing is, I've received e-mails," he says, without further explanation. "And I accept the fact that my phone is probably tapped. I have to think very carefully about what I get behind in a public way."

In Madison, like numerous other places, the 9/11 Truth Movement has coalesced into a semi-coherent, loosely organized army of "truthers." Some of them see the events of 9/11 as part of a much broader conspiracy, a 2,000-year quest for world domination by an elite cabal that has moved through the ages largely unnoticed. Until now.

For Hammond, 36, a Madison-based freelance writer, the realization that 9/11 attacks were an inside job has brought with it a sense of obligation. As one of the few who know the truth, his duty is to enlighten others.

"I'm pissed!" exclaims Hammond. "And I'm not going to stand for it. I'm on the frontlines every chance I get. I've already sent an e-mail to my entire extended family and everyone else in my e-mail contacts saying, ‘Hey, look!'"

In Wisconsin, the 9/11 conspiracy movement has burst into public view in recent weeks due largely to an angry backlash against one of its most prominent proponents.

Dr. Kevin Barrett, a Madison resident and lecturer at the UW-Madison, has come under fire from politicians and conservative commentators. State Rep. Steve Naas (R-Whitewater) has called for Barrett's dismissal, as has Republican gubernatorial candidate Mark Green. Even Gov. Jim Doyle has questioned his fitness to teach. But the UW, after an extended review, has affirmed its decision to let Barrett teach an introductory Islamic studies course this fall.

They Believe: 9/11 Truthers Spin Shadowy Conspiracy Theories

David Hammond is articulate, well-educated and seemingly thoughtful. He is also paranoid. And the harder he works to convince others that the U.S. government orchestrated the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, the more paranoid he becomes.

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 35
Next >>
 
I know this 'David Hammond' - and let me tell you what he is: a repressed homosexual who fled from Neenah WI (and his bible bashing nutty parents) to go live in 'hip' 'liberal' Madison WI many years ago. He pretended to be a 'musician' (a tone deaf bass-player) in order to give himself a raison d'etre, but when he got too old for that BS, he became a 'freelance writer' (!!!) The dude is pathetic, a social parasite who has no mind of his own.

Posted on 06/05/2008 at 12:06:58 PM

 
#4. Why did Bin Laden immediately rush to take credit for 9/11? And if the Bin Laden we have seen is just some actor as some have asserted, why has Bin Laden or his ilk not come forward to discount that? #5. Do you think Bush and his administration are the most brilliant group of individuals ever assembled? #6. Do you think your accusations will ever gain acceptance among anyone credible and not be seen as outrageous silliness by a bunch of fringe, delusional disenfranchised individuals consumed by contempt for core American values but mostly the Bush administration?

Posted on 12/27/2007 at 1:12:28 PM

 
Just a few questions for you "truthers" out there who still cling to the delusion that the US attacked itself on Sept. 11th, a theory that is scoffed at by the most strident and influential liberals such as Bill Mahr and Bill Clinton. #1. If Bush had knowledge of the attack, wouldn't he have picked a better time than when he was sitting among elementary school students with a bunch of cameras pointed directly at him? Or do you think that Bush is such a genius and planned it that way? #2. How do you account for the family members of the different flights receiving telephone calls, having conversations and the messages left on their voice mails? #3. Why has not ONE person come forward out of the hundreds, if not thousands, and gone public with their role in the greatest caper in modern history? Or anyone that witnessed the demolition crew that would have occupied the twin towers for months? #4. Why did Bin Laden immediately rush to take credit for 9/11? And if the Bin Laden

Posted on 12/27/2007 at 1:12:11 PM

 
To all the detractors out there: watch Loose Change, 2nd edition, and then come back and discuss this. I once believed the official story too. Then, I began studying the facts, based on the discrepancies I saw everywhere. Four years later, Loose Change appeared as a compliation of nearly everything I had learned. Do you think I want to believe this? Do you think I want this to be true? No. I wish it weren't, but the facts strongly say otherwise. With all due respect, please do your homework before commenting on something you know nothing about. Now go Google and watch Loose Change, THEN come back and discuss this. David

Posted on 11/01/2006 at 9:11:00 PM

 
Go get butt bounced kyle... boy, if you would clean your boyfriends crap out of your ears for only a second perhaps you would see how stupid you really are. And for the record any of you who actually beleive the whine-tit mentality of "conspiracy theory" really need to see a psych doctor. Get over your bull shit!!!!!

Posted on 09/12/2006 at 7:09:00 PM

 
Go get butt bounced kyle... boy, if you would clean your boyfriends crap out of your ears for only a second perhaps you would see how stupid you really are. And for the record any of you who actually beleive the whine-tit mentality of "conspiracy theory" really need to see a psych doctor. Get over your bull shit!!!!!

Posted on 09/12/2006 at 7:09:00 PM

 
I don't think you have to be a Bush fan to think 911 conspiracies are false. I don't like Bush... and I don't like conspiracy theories. Anyone can give "proof" of something they want to believe, because everything that happens can have a million explanations, and a million viewpoints. I would rather listen to my heart, and what feels true, along with hard facts (unless I can see it for myself) than listen to a bunch of theories. It's also important to look at the source of the conspiracies as well. What is their motivation?

Posted on 09/11/2006 at 5:09:00 PM

 
Anyone else notice how similar Ronald Whatever's reasons for praising Bush as a "Christ Figure" are to those of the "Islamo Fascists" who "hate our freedom"?

Posted on 08/20/2006 at 9:08:00 PM

 
But I suppose the impossible and Orwellian war on a concept, terrorism, isn't paranoid or crackpot! BTW, the official story involves a conspiracy, so gee I suppose it's a paranoid and silly conspiracy theory. Most so called "conspiracy theorists" are simply aware of and analyzing all the facts and discoveries of 9/11-while the gov't sommersaults and begst the questions with even more absurdist theoretical stretches (i.e. the pancake theory) to account for the facts that stubborn segments of the population insist on continually acknowledging.

Posted on 08/20/2006 at 8:08:00 PM

 
Read from my 3rd comment going up. I was unaware of the space restriction: (Pythagorean theorem anyone?). I loath all you "value voters" who think that banning homosexuality is more important than stopping our government from the genocide hundreds of thousands of people. That bringing God and worship to the heathens is more important than feeding and sheltering our sick and homeless. You people sicken me. You proclaim many things from the Bible, but practice none of them. You are all frauds. I mean fuck, you still think that Iraq and Al'Qaeda have any sort of connection. I know, I know, the government said it so it must be true, right?

Posted on 08/14/2006 at 2:08:00 AM

 
So many of you are so blissfuly unaware. I feel sorry for you, at the same time I envy you. If you want an extremist view, how about this. Our constitution and bill have rights have been torn to shreads, our entire country is on the brink of chaos, self inflicted, and martial law is not far off. When Bush's second term is over (and I say this with the acknowledgement that he was never elected, nor reelected but actually appointed. By the second term he had enough power to rig the elections outright. Bush supporters, do you know who Howard Dean is? Do you know why he wasn't in the race? Do you know of the blood connection between Bush and Kerry?) But I digress. Within several months we will be "offically" invading and at war with Iran (The operations have alread started). Our country is going to shit, and it's because people believe anything if they're told it enough times. The sad thing is, the people who seem the most crazy often turn out to be the only ones who were right (Pyth

Posted on 08/14/2006 at 2:08:00 AM

 
This is actually very true. If you were to do ANY research at all into the events of 9/11 you would realize there is no possible way that the official story rings true. A lot of you appear to be misunderstanding. This isn't an attack on Bush, he is but a pawn, well, perhaps a bishop. Our entire nation has been lead astray, our founding fathers would not recognize our country today as the one they founded. Our constitution has been torn to shreads, our media is biased and self serving. Greed dominates all. Stop listening to American news sources for a couple months, get some outside perspectives, and awaken yourselves. Bush is kind? How can you even attempt to claim the hundreds of thousands of deaths he has caused (Iraq alone) is anything but homicidal mania? Well, I suppose you could call it a lot of things, but compassionate is not one of them. I like how everyone defending the offical story have to resort to name calling, "extremists, lefties, liberals" and the like. So many o

Posted on 08/14/2006 at 2:08:00 AM

 
I think you all need to visit http://www.ericisgreat.com/tinfoilhats/index.html and place an order today. :)

Posted on 08/13/2006 at 11:08:00 AM

 
Although highly unlikely, the scenarios described by so called "paranoid" people could be true. Not saying they are, but they could be.

Posted on 08/12/2006 at 3:08:00 PM

 
Let me get this straight. Bush was responsible for everything bad that ever happened... right... How about the 911 comission was a crock of crap because of Jamie Gorelick? It was her name on the memos that forbade the FBI and CIA from communicating. It was her ex boss, Bill Clinton who dropped the ball repeatedly with terrorist attacks ( the USS Cole, Kobar Towers, the embassies, the 1st WTC attack and more) but you want to blame Bush? Are you frigging nuts?

Posted on 08/10/2006 at 7:08:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 35
Next >>
Most Commented On