Find » Opinion/Editorial » My Take on the Mitchell Report

My Take on the Mitchell Report

By chosen1, published Dec 20, 2007
Published Content: 23  Total Views: 3,564  Favorited By: 2 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.0 of 5
From reading various different opinions on former Senator George Mitchell's investigation into Major League Baseball from professional sports writers, it appears the opinions are wide ranging. Some think that it is a good things, others not. I tend to side on the not.

Reasons being that this gentleman had no legal authority to do what he did. In my mind, this report is not official by any means and the players named were not given the appropriate forum to rebut the claims of the individuals that were named as sources in the report. The sources themselves more than likely have their own agenda ranging from a personal issue with whomever they claimed did what they did to getting their five minutes of fame by being named in the report itself.

Because there is no legal standing for the report, Major League Baseball should take no action against the named players. For this to happen, the Commissioner of the league Bud Selig and the Players Union would need to come to some sort of agreement on how to formally handle this issue which from all accounts are far from being agreed upon.

If I am one of the players that was named in this report, I would pay it no mind and go on with life as usual. The only problem with this is that the general public has already made their decision about these players and court of public opinion has general deemed them guilty without a fair trial. The last time I checked, you were innocent until PROVEN guilty.

Now guys like Roger Clemans for example have had their impressive careers put into question. How would you like it if you entire body of work where you are employed was put into question by the rantings of a jealous employee? You probably would be upset, hurt and wonder why that this person would do this. Furthermore, Mr. Mitchell only interviewed (without subpoena power) a small sampling of a much larger group. Again, a misguided truth of what really is the issue.

Comments
Comment 1 of 1
 
 
good read. I've been extremely intrigued by this subject and unfortunately according to the Mitchell Report itself, Mitchell states that "the Commissioner promised, and I agreed, that the public should know what I learned from this investigation." Its on like page SR-34 in the report and page 42 of the PDF. Cheers, Michael

Posted on 12/21/2007 at 1:12:25 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comment 1 of 1
 
Advertisment