Next Generation DVD Authoring: Why Blu-ray Disc is Better Than HD DVD

Blu-ray Disc and HD DVD Uncovered

In the coming months there will be contentious debate about which format is better, HD DVD or Blu-ray Disc (BD). There are some clear technical advantages BD has over HD DVD such as higher capacity (50GB for BD v. 30GB for HD DVD) and higher data rates (50mbps for BD v. 31mbps for HD
 DVD.) These are no small factors when you consider the file sizes and data throughput required to display 1080p HD video.

Both formats have had a rough start, but as more players start rolling out, and authoring and production work flows start to settle, the formats will be on more even ground for true comparisons, not based on first-generation players and problematic software issues.

The marketing machines are already kicking into high gear and the winner and of this format battle may be determined by hype, not technical merit. That's coming from the consumer's perspective, but which format could prove best from the perspective of next-generation DVD authors?

Once again I have to give the nod to Blu-ray Disc. There are basic technology aspects as stated above, but from an authoring standpoint, there are advantages to working with BD over HD DVD. Granted there are not currently a lot of authoring tools available. With the exception of Sonic Solutions, there are not any HD DVD/BD authoring applications on the market as of July 2006. That's bound to change in the next 6-12 months, but for now, most HD DVD and BD titles are being hand jammed, a process more akin to software development than DVD authoring. When fully implemented authoring programs do become available, it will soon become clear why BD is better.

Related information
  • Blu-ray Disc stores 50GB compared with HD DVD's 30GB.
  • Interactive Blu-ray Disc will be easier to author than HD DVD.
  • Initial cost of Blu-ray Disc will be more than HD DVD.
 
Comments 1 - 10 of 10  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

Hd is better cause I own one ..and I dont want to buy a blu-ray player ... that is all

Posted on 09/13/2007 at 5:09:00 PM

Herman, you're wrong. Java acceleration will be present in all players supporting the BD-Live profile, which is mandatory for all players released after June, 2007, and will be part of the PS3. Further, 300MHz is low for most of these units.

Posted on 08/14/2006 at 12:08:00 PM

Sure, VC-1 was available for BD a couple of years back, but today, do you see any BD discs that use it? Get a brain ... Okay, now that the kiddie school insults are over, what Herman was trying to say is that things look good in paper, but by the time it becomes reality, it may already be too late. So basically, he *is* talking about what's reality for BD right now.

Posted on 08/10/2006 at 9:08:00 PM

Yeah, let's talk about right now. 50GB disks are in production but not enough successful disks that they are being sold. Get a brain ...

Posted on 08/10/2006 at 9:08:00 PM

Uh Brian...have you read anything lately? VC-1 is available on BD as is every other codec on HD-DVD. Great...another holographic storage guy. Is it in production? If not its a waste to talk about right now. Why not talk about ion data stream transmissions? And for the unbiased..the 50 gig disks are in production just not slated for release yet as they are in a testng phase ad limited production. Get a brain...

Posted on 08/10/2006 at 1:08:00 PM

BD-J uses a 300Mhz processor running Linux and no acceleration. Those glorious high definition 32 bit graphics might not be as fast as you would like. It also may not be robust enough for you to run those J2ME applications successfully as much as you would like. The media likes to say Blu-Ray will prevail "long term" a lot, but long term in this business is holographic storage.

Posted on 08/09/2006 at 11:08:00 PM

Shame about the fact that the Blu-Ray Disc Association does not mandate picture-in-picture support for players, leaving content providers to try to choose between doing fancy picture-in-picture special features that some players can't even display, or ignoring a feature that HD DVD discs have managed with even first-generation discs. There are countless people versed in the web-based markup languages that iHD is based upon, so I don't see content authoring being a problem in this regard. If iHD is such a chore to author for versus BD-J, why is it that some first-generation HD DVD titles take advantage of iHD (including the picture-in-picture features that all HD DVD players must support, unlike BD players) yet not a single first-generation Blu-Ray release supports BD-J. The entire article is flying in the face of logic and fact.

Posted on 08/09/2006 at 8:08:00 PM

"The difference is that, in this basic mode, BD authors will be able to create animated pop-up menus with uninterrupted playback and other features that would have to be coded in iHD. Blu-ray Disc also allows an author to superimpose HD video over the HD movie, a feat that HD DVD can't currently substantiate." Shame about the fact that the Blu-Ray Disc Association does not mandate picture-in-picture support for players, leaving content providers to try to choose between doing fancy picture-in-picture special features that some players can't even display, or ignoring a feature that HD DVD discs have managed with even first-generation discs. There are countless people versed in the web-based markup languages that iHD is based upon, so I don't see content authoring being a problem in this regard. If iHD is such a chore to author for versus BD-J, why is it that some first-generation HD DVD titles take advantage of iHD (including the picture-in-picture features that all HD DVD p

Posted on 08/09/2006 at 8:08:00 PM

I agree with Brian. Call BD/Sony Fanboy all the way. Stating anything like "HD DVD Can't currently substantiate" is rather ironic, since there are no mass produced 50 gig disks on the market to date, and their version of HD's in movie experience is non-existent and isn't available yet, this list could go on and on but go ahead and substatiate that for us baby. I'm not a BD hater just tired of hearing the wonders of blu-ray without seeing any of it on the market...

Posted on 08/09/2006 at 3:08:00 PM

I can tell that you are a Sony Fanboy. Most of what you said is absolutely false. First of all, eventhough the Blu-Ray does have a higher capasity, they need that. Sony is using MPEG-2 video format as opposed to Microsoft's VC-1 that HD DVD uses. VC-1 has a compression ratio that is much more powerful than the MPEG-2 coded (that is 10 years old...very outdated). Not only does it have a better compression ratio, it also produces much better quality even when compaired to the 1080p that Sony is pushing on the PS3. You say "iHD is that it is coding intensive." Well that is using languages that are very easy to use and understand. Blu-Ray uses Java which is very slow, clunky and not easy to work with in many situations. This is going to make production for Blu-Ray much more intensive. You calim that the Blu-Ray will be able to overlap HD video ontop of other HD video. HD DVD can also do that. It has been shown to work in many different presentations. But I have yet to see it hap

Posted on 08/09/2006 at 12:08:00 PM

Comments 1 - 10 of 10