Find » Society » The Anti-Smoking Movement

The Anti-Smoking Movement

Hey Buddy, Can I Bum a Smoke?

By Sean Keefer, published Aug 09, 2006
Published Content: 65  Total Views: 123,216  Favorited By: 9 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.0 of 5
Headlines for the past few years frequently address measures by town council's, city aldermen, county commissions or even state legislatures to outlaw smoking in different public areas. These efforts have been successful in many areas. For example, California makes it tough to smoke in many public places. In New York City, forget smoking in bars and restaurants, Washington, DC has outlawed smoking in bars and restaurants; Chicago is presently considering a similar ban. Some other countries have completely banned smoking in public places. The bottom line is that the movement is gaining steam, lots of it, and the anti-smoking movement will continue to roll. There are critics of these laws and the anti-smoking efforts, but for them, it may be too little, too late.

More than a decade ago, California 's anti-smoking laws went into effect. The result was that you could no longer smoke in most public places. Since then, California 's laws have become even tougher. Under the initial law, smoking was prohibited within 5 feet of the entrance to a public building. Under the state's new 2004 law, smoking is prohibited within 20 feet of the front of the building unless the smoker is walking. However, by the time the state of California passed the law, many cities and counties in the state had already passed laws more restrictive than the state law. The current 2004 law also allows other jurisdictions and institutions in the state the ability to make the anti-smoking laws more restrictive.

In New York City , you can't smoke in any restaurant or bar. The primary focus of this law, the California and laws in other cities such as Boston , is to protect not only patrons, but employees from second hand smoke. When these laws began to first be proposed and brought before the legislatures and various other governmental bodies, the cries and protest from restaurant and bar owners were that if smokers were prohibited from smoking, then their business would suffer. Patrons would stay away, owners would lose profits, the establishments would close and the economy would suffer. Funny thing is, this hasn't happened.

The Anti-Smoking Movement

No Smoking

Credit: unknown

Copyright: n/a

Takeaways
  • Some countries have completely banned smoking.
  • California has some of the most restrictive smoking regulations in the country.
  • Smoking is generally prohibited in many public buildings.
Did You Know?
Bars and restaurants are generally the focus of new smoking laws or bans.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
 
guit selling cigarettes! thats the answer. states can stop making money fron us who are on this drug.

Posted on 10/10/2007 at 6:10:00 AM

 
(continued from last comment) But when the issue finally made its way to the New York State Supreme Court, the Court upheld treaty rights over the demands of state revenue departments. The only thing accomplished by a cigarette tax is the diversion of money away from in-state retailers to New York's Seneca Nation. And who can blame buyers when the in-state price of a carton is $40 and the reservation price is $15 (shipping, included)?

Posted on 05/14/2007 at 2:05:00 PM

 
(continued from last comment) Fortunately there is one avenue of defense the smoker can use in the area of taxation. And non-smokers should think about this EVERY time someone proposes a new project to be funded by cigarette-tax revenue. Because of the never-ending upward cycle of cigarette taxes in this country, many smokers have decided to buy untaxed cigarettes online or by phone from Native American sellers. And the only people caught doing this by their state revenue departments are the "stupid" buyers. The "smart" buyers buy only from one of the 10 tribes of the Seneca Nation in New York - the only Native sellers who are exempt, by treaty, from tax-reporting laws outside New York state. For example, if Oregon's revenue people demanded to know the names and addresses of Oregon customers, the Seneca seller would tell them to go fish. State enforcement people have tried to enforce cooperation through New York courts. But when the issue finally made its way to the New York Sta

Posted on 05/14/2007 at 2:05:00 PM

 
Just some comments and I'll go back into my smoky hole (grin). First, don't make the mistake of thinking that anti-smoking forces consider the sanctity of a home as untouchable. I live in a state that almost passed a law making ALL smoking in a "place of business" illegal. The law was so broad as to encompass businesses operated out of a home (as defined by the IRS). Under the proposed law, a novelist who declares his home office as a "place of business" and takes deductions on expenditures for that home office would not be able to smoke in it. And if he/she did, the police could break into the home office to cite the violator. Secondly, smokers clearly see the handwriting on the wall as to "place" issues. So far, voters have been savvy enough to reject laws that violate the privacy of the home ... which, after the anti-smokers have their way, will be the only place left where smoking can be done legally. Fortunately, there is one avenue of defense the smoker can use in the a

Posted on 05/14/2007 at 2:05:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
Most Commented On