Lakota Indians Declare Sovereign Nation Status

By Tabitha Fleming, published Dec 23, 2007
Published Content: 30  Total Views: 13,270  Favorited By: 4 CPs
Rating: 4.3 of 5
The United States is going to have to do a lot to work with members of the Lakota Sioux in the days ahead. Wednesday, December 19, a group that represents various reservations and states declared sovereign nation status and has withdrawn from all treaties with the U.S. government.

The Lakota Freedom Delegation, includes Lakota activist and actor Russell Means; Ogalala Lakota Strong Heart Society leader Duane Martin Sr.; Gary Rowland, Leader Chief Big Foot Riders; Women of Red Nations founder Phyllis Young and others were at the Plymouth Congregational Church in Washington DC to announce the tribe's withdrawal from the treaties.

"For far too long our people have suffered at the hands of the colonial apartheid system imposed on the Lakota Sioux," a press release dated December 13 read, "Our treaties with the United States government are nothing more than worthless words on worthless paper - repeatedly violated in order to steal our culture, our land and our ability to maintain our way of life."

According to the organization, and the website www.lakotafreedom.com, Lakota men have a life expectancy of less than 44 years, the lowest of any country in the World, including Haiti. The infant mortality rate is 5x the U.S. Average and the Tuberculosis rate on Lakota reservations is approximately 800 percent higher than the U.S. national average.

"We have no choice but to take historic action to protect our people and our way of life," the group said, "and reclaim our freedom from the colonial systems of the United States Government." The group has also stated that they intend to issue their own driving licenses and passports.

The move focuses on lands in 5 states, including South Dakota, North Dakota, Nebraska, Wyoming and Montana. Lands the groups claims have been illegally homesteaded for years.

What will happen next is up to the United States government, but the group said in a news release that if the U.S. fails to act, liens will be filed on real-estate transactions across the region, an action that could cause title issues for literally thousands of purchasers.

Lakota Indians Declare Sovereign Nation Status
Date: December 19, 2007
Location:
Washington, DC  USA

Eddie Plenty Holes, a Lakota Sioux photographed approximately 1899.

Credit: Public Domain

Copyright: Public Domain

Takeaways
  • "Our treaties with the United States government are nothing more than worthless words..."
  • Bolivia Indigenous President Evo Morales is "very, very interested in the Lakota case."
  • "Would we need a passport to leave the rez?"
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 10 of 10
 
 
Great article and great reporting on a very intriguing situation! Personally, I think sovereign nation status would be very bad for the Lakota Sioux people. I've been to that area of the country and I just can't imagine them making much money out of it, nor organizing themselves well enough to support their own people (as you showed with the quote from one person). Their frustration and desires are evident enough, but I just don't think this sounds like a move that is good for them. I think they probably need to clean up their own act first (they're already using much federal aid) and then be prepared for declaring independence.

Posted on 01/12/2008 at 11:01:42 AM

 
Awesome. I hope they make it. Thank you so much for reporting on this! I didn't see this on any traditional news outlets.

Posted on 01/04/2008 at 7:01:23 PM

 
(sorry, too long) single treaty they ever made with them. But the rights and health and welfare of the Lakota may not be improved by independent nation status. It is a complex situation with no easy answers. You've done a good job, I think, in writing what is currently going on -- I haven't found a lot of information from other sources, so don't know how complete this is, but it certainly seems fair and well-written, if a little biased (in the same way that I am biased -- FOR the rights of indigenous peoples). But there's nothing wrong with having an opinion if you support it with facts, which you did, and did well. Thank you!

Posted on 01/03/2008 at 6:01:27 PM

 
I find it interesting, and perhaps telling, that you mentioned no tribal council members supporting this action (the people of the Standing Rock Sioux reservation -- who have voted to keep their name as "SIOUX" rather than Dakota and/or Lakota -- both are correct, depending on the band -- elect their tribal council, as do most Sioux bands). I also find it interesting that Russell Means, who married a Navajo woman, and tried to become the leader of the Navajo nation, is reclaiming his Lakota heritage. And that this coalition is doing NOTHING to obtain the release of Leonard Peltier, who has been wrongly imprisoned while Means makes money. I too support the Lakota and Dakota PEOPLE -- who are not necessarily represented by the individuals who have declared themselves a separate nation. The U.S. government, along with the British, Canadian, Dutch, French, and too many others to mention, should be ashamed of their treatment of indigenous peoples around the world, and of breaking every sin

Posted on 01/03/2008 at 6:01:55 PM

 
ALSO, Alex Jones (radio show host/documentary film maker) had them on for an interview on 12/30/07 and will have Duane Martin Sr. on again in the near future.

Posted on 01/02/2008 at 7:01:52 AM

 
I am VERY excited and scared for the Lakotah Sioux. I support them 100%. And about securing foreign aid, they are and have. They did not go into this unprepared, the problems have been going on for a long time and they too have been preparing for this.

Posted on 01/02/2008 at 7:01:02 AM

 
The La Razas do not seem to know that Spain and citizens of societies that is now Mexico took, by force, the land they claim belongs to them, from tribes that lived upon it, perhaps even Lakota Sioux. People from around the world have settled upon what is now the USA. None alive today were part of that yesterday. I think it better to put past injuries behind us and unite to fight a corrupt government. That is we, the people, will suffer in another civil war, when the enemy is the existing (and past) governments.

Posted on 12/25/2007 at 4:12:06 PM

 
Interesting news not reported by mainstream media. I feel for what was done unto the natives that lived on these lands we now call the Untied States of America. I also fear a civil war in the 21st century, which is what this move could cause. (more likely US military power would destroy the tribes, if the tribes have not secured foreign aid to protect themselves)The La Razas are waging their own war on the US government to get back 5 states "we stole from them". The premise is they are not illegal immigrants but they are the rightful owners of the land.

Posted on 12/25/2007 at 3:12:51 PM

 
Thanks for the compliment, I'm currently working on a follow-up and waiting for a response from the organization.

Posted on 12/23/2007 at 8:12:20 PM

 
Very interesting article, please do follow-up on this story.

Posted on 12/23/2007 at 8:12:21 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 10 of 10
 
Most Commented On