Russell Means Continues to Advocate for Lakota Secession

Have the Lakota Natives Found the Means to Secede from the United States?

"We are no longer citizens of the United States of America and all those who live in the five-state area that encompasses our country are free to join us,"says Lakota Native Russell Means, former Libertarian Presidential candidate and now angry secessionist.

According to Means, the new Lakota Nation will not charge any taxes and will issue its own national drivers licenses and passports, but there will be loosely confederated autonomous communities within the nation each making its own community rules.
Russell Means Continues to Advocate for Lakota Secession
Date: December 20, 2007
Rapid City, SD
United States of America
 

Means is trying to break from a 150-year-old treaty with the United States that makes the large Lakota Reservation part of the U.S. He insists that according to Article VI of the United States Constitution, treaties are the supreme law of the land, and they can be renounced if they were essentially worthless-which is exactly how he characterizes the Lakota-United States treaties of 1851 and 1868.

Means insists that the treaties were designed to make the Native people sovereign, yet in practice they are anything but sovereign.

Lakota territory cuts across North and South Dakota, Nebraska, Wyoming, and Montana. The Lakota are the largest sub-division of the Dakota Nation of Native Americans and are renowned for their prowess in hunting buffalo.

Means says that his deeply troubled people are sick and tired of being treated as second-class citizens under an apartheid system imposed upon them, and that if they take back their autonomy they can cure their societal ills and be a great nation.

The Lakota elders demanded of their people in 1974 that their community begin making lasting relationships with the international community and re-establishing their identity and autonomy.

This week, the secessionists visited the U.S. State Department along with the embassies of Bolivia, Venezuela, Chile, and South Africa in order to seek formal recognition.

 
Comments 1 - 10 of 18 Next >>
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

Research the Buck Act, and find out how criminals in Washington created an abstract of government to mirror lawful government. Was not this done to steal our land and our labor? South Dakota is the description of the land mass in which people live. The State of South Dakota is the legal fiction existing in abstract form upon which Washington, D.C., exerts control and from which Washington, D.C., extracts taxes. It is a Buck Act State. To participate is voluntary. To opt out is voluntary. If people get in your face, and point guns at you and tell you otherwise, they are criminals, and should be dealt with as such. Research Due Process of Law and Common Law Due Process. Read the book, the Lost Right

Posted on 11/26/2008 at 8:11:49 PM

Broken promises and enslavement of people is not restricted to the Europeans over indigenous people, it crosses races and is imposed by those who have a leveraged advantage over the less sophisticated and more intellectually honest. Thus, the bankers rule the world. There seems to be a lot of confusion over terminology, and that needs to be corrected if people are to communicate effectively. The "United States" is not America, nor is it these united States of America. The fundamental difference between the two is that the United States describes a legal fiction existing on paper and in binary code on computers, and these united states of America describes land masses upon which people live. The United States, by its ministers, might administer certain properties on behalf of certain people. It is a constructive trust, and perhaps a corporation. It's hard to tell after so many bankruptcies and reorganizations under international trade agreement and treaties. We can't even te

Posted on 11/26/2008 at 8:11:57 PM

On tusday 6/24/08 there will be a meeting at the Native American Center in Chadron NE 69337 on 2nd st,(morning afternoon) from what I understand there has been a history of injustice twards natives in Chadron. This injustice comes in the form of racial profileing or focusing more on natives with stiffer sentencing if you know of any injustice,if you are a lakota native or want to know more about REPUBLIC OF LAKOTA and the RED RIBBON GRAND JURY you should attend. I'M SORRY THIS INFORMATION COMES SO LATE I JUST HERD YESTERDAY 6/19/08 from a coworker he is vary excited and tells of a change comming there is power in numbers and in the court records that will show that for natives the system is not just.

Posted on 06/20/2008 at 3:06:35 AM

Very interesting article (and subsequent debate)!

Posted on 03/04/2008 at 12:03:08 PM

My grandfather was a aim member he died in seventy three, i never knew him, my mom said he was a bad man becuse he wanted to be free, he did not live by anyones rules he was free untill he died, many of you don't rember how bad my people have been treated i do, the first treatys that was made with the lakota should stand as long as grass grows water flows and the sky is blue, thats what they said but they lied they always lied and they still lie about everything that they did and have done, why do some of you not understand what he is doing he is trying to right the wrong that has been done to all native americans that is there land all of it give it back to them make one thing right in the mess we called the indian wars or better known as the exstinction of the first americans, or will you all agree the "indian" is gone and you can read about him in a book or your kids may get one chapter in there history book , i hope you will learn more about the truth then if you dont have a hart y

Posted on 02/06/2008 at 3:02:17 PM

This is not secession. Secession requires one party to have first given its CONSENT to be part of a state. Secession is what happened when the southern U.S. state gave their consent to be part of the U.S. by ratifying the U.S. Constitution, and then, withdrew their consent. The Lakota, and other indigenous peoples, have never given their free and informed consent to be occupied and colonized by the U.S. The proper term to use for the LAKOTA initiative is an act of decolonizing, self-determination. That is how most free countries in the world today gained their independence from colonialism, and that may be how indigenous peoples re-gain their original independence.

Posted on 12/30/2007 at 4:12:26 PM

USA never let it happen. As I saw what USA done, USA kills all Lakota people and never let them build a new country.

Posted on 12/25/2007 at 4:12:39 PM

We save Our Mother by taking back what is Ours !

Posted on 12/24/2007 at 5:12:46 PM

Hey Jawanza. Plain and simple. The Europeans are not the only people with violence in their past. Pretty much all of the world's cultures have had some period of violence and destruction. Even the earth loving American Indians. And if you are going to judge an entire race on the actions of a few greedy folks at the top of the power structure, you kinda sound like a racist. Your days of blaming everything on the white folks need to come to an end. Time to move on. Please stop spreading this hatred. It's not a black or white thing. It's "haves" and "have nots". If all of us "have nots" would pull together, we could really change the world. There are a lot more of us. It's the "haves" that want us to be focused on issues that split us apart. Like race. Like abortion. Like gay marriage. Like religion. We all really want the same things in life. We want peace, we want to raise our families, we want to be paid fairly for our hard work, we want to live our lives.

Posted on 12/24/2007 at 9:12:59 AM

Great Article, I ran one on this too, but a little different... http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/496203/lakota_indians_declare_sovereign_nation.html Take a look!

Posted on 12/23/2007 at 8:12:17 PM

Comments 1 - 10 of 18 Next >>