Find » Society » Religion & Spirituality » How Religion, Politics Mix this Ele...

How Religion, Politics Mix this Election

By Cameron Pierce, published Dec 24, 2007
Published Content: 87  Total Views: 23,849  Favorited By: 4 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.3 of 5
Didn't your mom ever tell you that religion and politics do not mix and should never be discussed? However, people and more importantly, presidential candidates are discussing politics more than ever. With the upcoming January 3rd Iowa Caucus, candidates are talking and campaigning about their beliefs. Campaign advisers who use to advise against discussing their religion, are now emphasizing its importance. Many candidates have feared that talking about their religion would make voters of different faiths would lose their support. A country that has been built from separation of faith and government, is what has feared candidates from discussing it until now.

Candidates like Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney, openly speaks about his Mormon faith. Romney has talked about the religious freedom this country was based on and his right to choose any faith he wants to believe in. Further, he always tries to assure voters that he will not mix religion with politics if he becomes president. Vincent Goodwin, a student studying political science at American University in Washington, D.C., says discussing faith is more important than ever. "It is critical that these candidates talk about their faith, especially Romney. Some people are afraid that Romney will make decisions based on his religion. It is important to reassure the public he won't do that." Romney is a popular candidate that has opened up the presidential field in the future to all people of faith including Jews, Hindus, and even Buddhists.

Democratic candidate Barack Obama routinely talks about how God has inspired him. He is a Christian who has to continuously debunk the rumor he is a Muslim. He makes these clarifications on a regular basis. Goodwin, from American University, states, "People want to know that candidates have core values that stem from religion. We want to be assured that they are not cold-hearted people."

How Religion, Politics Mix this Election
Date: December 23, 2007
New York City, NY USA
Comments
Comments 1 - 10 of 10
 
 
They asked Americans to support Christians for elected office. John Adams and John Hancock said: "We Recognize No Sovereign but God, and no King but Jesus!" John Adams said: "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." Washington said religion was, "a necessary spring of popular government." In short, they totally opposed any establishment of any particular Christian sect as a state church, but they totally supported Christians electing Christians, speaking of their faith publicly, asking for prayer for God to guide their decisions. How far our country has come. Thanks be to God it is returning a little to its roots, even if everyone does not like it, as the comments here show.

Posted on 12/30/2007 at 2:12:35 PM

 
I cannot help but feel the author and many readers of this would have felt very uncomfortable around the founding fathers. Although the opposed mandatory church attendance, they were not afraid to speak of God in their speeches, ask for prayer for God's guidance, support prayer and Bible reading in school and ask for Christians to support Christians.

Posted on 12/30/2007 at 2:12:29 PM

 
A person's actions are dictated by that person's beliefs, whether s/he's a politician, a farmer, a hairdresser, a corporate raider, etc.. I just don't buy the notion that as human beings, we're able to make decisions without referencing our own beliefs in one way or another.

Posted on 12/30/2007 at 12:12:25 PM

 
I agree with Jack. So many people are too focused on what religions the candidates are instead of the important issues. Everyone can make decisions without their religion (if they have one) affecting it. People can have good morals and values without religion backing it. It seems like there are many people who do not understand that. I am a strong believer in separation of church and state. And it is a shame that some candidates feel they have to explain their religion, etc. because it could affect their chance in the race.

Posted on 12/30/2007 at 12:12:57 AM

 
Religion and politics have always mixed. It's happened in every civilization in the history of the world.

Posted on 12/28/2007 at 7:12:24 PM

 
Pro forma, Cameron...o.k. * For a backgrounder on all U.S. Presidents, please consider: "Religious Affiliation of U.S. Presidents" at http://www.adherents.com/adh_presidents.html . * For insight into major religions of the 21st Century, explore "The World's Religions: Christianity, Judaism, and Islam - In Search of Your Eternity" at http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/435961/the_worlds_religions_christianity_judaism.html . Be well, Michael

Posted on 12/28/2007 at 12:12:35 PM

 
It is a pathetic and sad state of affairs, and as Jack said - disgusting. It isn't something I would have seen coming, I would have hoped we would have moved ahead by now.

Posted on 12/25/2007 at 2:12:25 PM

 
Jack Oceano: I do not think religion and politics mixing is anything new. I am quite sure I have seen "lighting of the White House Christmas tree" ads or specials on TV or in news articles, long before today. Land disputes over territory that is now California were settled with a Papal Bull (that is the Pope, in Rome) between the Spanish, French, English settlers and Russian's who already had established seaports. The tribes already living upon land were not consulted it seems. "We are a Christian country" has been the mantra led by our current Pres, GWB.

Posted on 12/25/2007 at 1:12:56 PM

 
Religion is about to find itself facing a huge organized backlash that might prove it's undoing.

Posted on 12/24/2007 at 12:12:41 PM

 
Good article. The mixing of religion and politics this campaign season is disgusting, and it is evidence of America's regression. While the rest of the developed world moves forward, we alone move backwards. Instead of focusing on important issues, much of the American public remains ignorant and focuses instead on how religious candidates are. It's shameful. A superpower that bases its policies on myth and superstition is a dangerous one.

Posted on 12/24/2007 at 12:12:35 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 10 of 10
 
Advertisment