The American Empire: An Unholy Alliance Between Church and State

The Embrace of Government is a Death Grip for the Church

By Lee Shelton, published Aug 15, 2006
Published Content: 9  Total Views: 4,614  Favorited By: 0 CPs
Rating: 3.3 of 5
The man hailed as the first Christian emperor of Rome was Constantine, whose alleged "conversion" in 312 A.D. came on the eve of a great battle for the Roman throne. In the simplified version of the legend, Constantine saw a flaming cross in the sky emblazoned with the words "In hoc signo vinces," meaning "By this sign, conquer" - and he proceeded to do just that.

Constantine the Great, however, was far from Christian. Throughout his life, he remained a worshipper of Sol Invictus (the Invincible Sun) and retained the title of "Pontifex Maximus," which meant that, in addition to his duties as emperor, he served as the chief priest of the Roman pagan religion. (Ironically, the Catholic Church continues to bestow that title on its popes.)

Although Christianity was not the official religion of the Roman Empire during the reign of Constantine - that came later when Theodosius took the throne - it was tolerated and protected, which explains why so many Christians in the fourth century readily embraced their new emperor. How could anyone view the end of brutal persecution as a bad thing? In addition, Christians had a strong ally in government.

From Constantine's perspective, his acceptance of Christianity was probably more a marriage of convenience. There were numerous external and internal threats to the empire, so it was naturally easier to work with the Christians than to eliminate them. Their religion was spreading throughout the empire, so why not use that to his advantage? He could win over a growing minority segment of the population by ending their persecution while at the same time appeasing the majority by maintaining the old pagan practices. One of the ways he accomplished this was to merge Christianity with certain aspects of paganism, not the least of which included the celebration of Christmas and Easter.

Takeaways
  • Separation of church and state was intended to protect the church from the state.
  • Our modern church-state shows a shift among Christians toward a more militaristic worldview.
  • Christians cannot serve two masters; Christ does not share his throne with the state.
Comments
Showing Comment 1 of 1
 
 
Very insightful

Posted on 08/19/2006 at 3:08:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comment 1 of 1
 
Most Commented On