Misconceptions About Communism, Pt. III

By Brian Rice, published Jan 04, 2008
Published Content: 112  Total Views: 233,528  Favorited By: 10 CPs
Rating: 3.5 of 5
Misconceptions Number 9:

"Communism destroys liberty."

This myth has been harbored in the rhetoric of anti-communism for sometime; however, it bears no significant truth in the writings of Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin or the application of socialism. In fact, what is needed here is a redefinition of 'freedom.' Freedom can mean many things, and its application in political rhetoric is dependent upon the foundation of economic base. In capitalist-bourgeois society - where the market-based system of private ownership of the means of production provides the base for liberal society - economic freedom is heralded as the unique distinguishing characteristic from past feudal, monarchical societies. Through the development of bourgeois society, man has been attributed with economic freedom of private property. However, there is no denying that this has proven useful in developing a modern capitalist society. The legitimacy of any given right to private property is only vested in the political legitimacy of the given system/state in power. Thus, it has no objective reality outside the political/cultural/social superstructure.

In socialism, a new type of freedom is devised. Namely, the freedom from exploitation and the wage-labor system. Freedom, in its varying forms, finds new meaning under socialism that places it beyond the narrow scope of the economic freedoms of the bourgeoisie to own things. Instead, freedom is transformed into the right of every working man and woman to contribute his labor to the overall good of his social being while at the same time receiving the true value of his labor. The fruit of his labor (if you will) is neither siphoned off nor reversed into a wage for which he loses his invaluable efforts towards productivity. Rather, he is given (in return) the necessary goods for his survival and his labor is thus transformed into a more human process of production based on need, rather than exchange.

Misconception Number 10:

"Communism Does Not Work"

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
 
Socialism was shown to be an unworkable philosophy and system of governance 86 years ago when Ludwig von Mises wrote his book Socialism which explained exactly why socialism and forced collectivism in general is doomed to failure. This is backed up by evidence that the mixed market economies of the West and now China create much higher and better standards of living for their citizens than highly regulated and collectivized regimes such as North Korea, Cuba, Maoist China, and the USSR. Despite what you may think all of those "myths" have counterpoints based on real world evidence. Also you invoked the no True-Scotsman fallacy a couple of times. Collectivism doesn't work. It wasn't socialism that eliminated most mass poverty during the 17th-19th centuries but free markets and the Enlightenment ideas of evidence, reason, and individualism. There is a reason that the rich are the ones who support government intervention in markets. http://mises.org/books/socialism/contents.aspx

Posted on 06/23/2008 at 3:06:14 PM

 
That's a great idea. I will get working on that when I get a chance. I think that has a lot of potential and (as a topic of discussion) has been neglected in many academic circles.

Posted on 01/30/2008 at 12:01:52 AM

 
A brilliant follow-up. I especially like the way you respond to the uninformed and ignorant spouting of the gospel that communism has been revealed as failure. I would love to see you tackle the opposite of this contention by writing about how democracy as a pure theoretical theory can be accused of failure despite many more attempts at it than communism has been allowed.

Posted on 01/09/2008 at 3:01:12 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
Most Commented On