Free Thought Isn't Free

By Brett, published Jan 01, 2008
Published Content: 97  Total Views: 17,374  Favorited By: 16 CPs
Rating: 3.9 of 5
I have at times, argued quite extensively with atheists on AC, primarily Jeff Musall and Jack Oceano. During these arguments, I have often heard them and other atheists use the words "free thought" and "freethinker" in association with their beliefs. The definition of a freethinker is someone who forms an opinion about religion, morals, etc. independently. Nowhere in this definition does it imply that a freethinker shuns religion. The definition that the aforementioned writers seem to be going by is "one who is an atheist".

Let's examine just what it means to form an opinion "independently" shall we? The first problem that you run into is that no one ever forms a completely independent opinion. There is always someone that you look up to or an event or experience that shapes the way in which one views the world. Since this statement, therefore, cannot be taken as an absolute, we must begin not by looking at what freethinking is but rather at what it definitely is not. Freethinking is not when someone else tells you what to believe and you listen to them without question. Freethinking is not when you are never exposed to other beliefs. Freethinking is not when you are being influenced by the surrounding culture to take on a system of beliefs without a second thought.

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 5 of 5
 
 
I too have crossed swords occasionally with M. and O. This was brilliantly argued. It seems to me that the truly free thinkers are the ones who don't claim the title, as they are also the ones who understand how bounded and difficult truly free thought is. And free thinkers are the ones who occasionally change their minds -- not the ones who argue any kind of dogma.

Posted on 02/11/2008 at 12:02:22 PM

 
Let's at least take a more complete and accurate view of organized religion. Yes it has had some dreadful crimes against humanity, but it also has played a key role in the development of organized and free education, the first serious attempts at addressing the plights of the poor and the sick, and serious attempts to address social justice issues and the civil rights movement. Then again this actually shows the legitimacy of one of Brett;s other articles. There is a drastic difference between organized religion and true faith.

Posted on 01/06/2008 at 7:01:11 PM

 
Bear in mind that there is a huge difference between choosing to believe there is a God, and choosing to subscribe to an organization in which mortals define who God is and what He wants for others. The creation of myths to answer the unanswerable is as old as time. In a way it is simply human arrogance and a refusal to accept our limitations. Problems arise when the subscribers to one myth attempt to place their myth above all others and utilize any means, including murder, to impose their beliefs on others. The history of organized religion, replete with crimes against humanity, should be enough to convince any person of conscience to reject these myths and keep their concept of God private. These are the "free thinkers."

Posted on 01/03/2008 at 11:01:35 AM

 
He was also a Christian, he may have gone against traditional ideas, bt he still ws not an atheist.

Posted on 01/02/2008 at 10:01:19 AM

 
Very excellent article. One thing not everybody seems to know is that Darwin, who is responsible for a lot of the trip-trap they teach in school today, changed his mind before he died and tried to rescind his statements about the origin of man. But where people were eager to listen to him the first time, they didn't want to hear it when he took the other side. Don't let anyone discourage you. You're doing great.

Posted on 01/02/2008 at 10:01:16 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 5 of 5
 
Most Commented On