Barack Obama and John Edwards Tag-Team Hillary Clinton at New Hampshire Democratic Debate

Barack, Edwards Unite on Change; Clinton Claims She is Change

By B. Rock, published Jan 05, 2008
Published Content: 45  Total Views: 29,911  Favorited By: 2 CPs
Rating: 4.0 of 5
The Democratic Debate today in New Hampshire was quite the sight. Barack Obama and John Edwards sat on one side of the table, seemingly tag-teaming in a sustained attack against Hillary Clinton.

Bill Richardson once commented that he had been at hostage negotiations that were more civil than the beginning of the debate.

Clinton Has a History of Change

Clinton was strong from the beginning in claiming that she was an agent of change. She claims that her opponents, Barack and Edwards, are all talk - while she has a long history of putting change into practice. At one point, she claimed 35 years of experience. At another point, she claimed she was change embodied.

Yet throughout the debate, Clinton appeared to be on the defensive. She is coming off a defeat in the Iowa Caucus, and the polls reported during the debate show her neck and neck with Barack Obama in New Hampshire. There is a very real possibility that she will lose again when New Hampshire voters go to the polls for their own primary.

Barack and Edwards Seated Together, Joint Victim of Clinton Attacks

One of the best images of the night was when Barack Obama and Edwards had both finished answering a question and Clinton responded. She requested a reality check, and went on to press her claim that she could offer more substantial change than either Barack or Edwards. The camera panned out, showing Edwards and Barack eagerly scribbling on their pads while Richardson sat in his seat without moving.

For most of the night, Richardson seemed inconsequential. He fielded a number of questions, re-iterating his own resume. He emphasized his experience negotiating with foreign nations and made some broad claims about how to help the foreign policy and energy policy of the country. He did raise one of the only references to education and No Child Left Behind. The other candidates seemed to ignore him, though, focusing their responses at each other.

Takeaways
  • Clinton on the defensive, claims she has embodied change in her career
  • Barack and Edwards united on the front of change; focus their joint attacks against Hillary
  • Richardson seemingly unimportant; repeats his resume but doesn't attract much interest
Did You Know?
Edwards responded to a Clinton attack by claiming that whenever you call for change, the agents of the status quo will attack you.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
 
Very enjoyable commentary! Thanks for posting your observations! Kim

Posted on 02/13/2008 at 11:02:25 AM

 
Due to the Supreme Courts ruling a 50 year ban on cross burnings in Virgina was over turned and charges dropped against a man who burned a cross in neighbor's yard. They were so terrorized the family moved. The Clinton's "we love black people" had the power at the time to enact a law banning the Ku Klux Klan terrorists. Change? Emboldened by the white ladies judge's decision the Klanish people are now trying to get the government to repeal the Civil Rights Act that Ms. Clinton gives credit to a white pres to having been passed. All those that died to demand action from the government did not in any way contribute to that, she seems to be implying. Then she turns around and accuses Obama of starting controversy over her remark, even tho' he never mentioned her remark at all. They used to burn witches at the stake. Edwards and Obama could bring the Democrats a win. Republicans have been claiming victory over Hillary before the race began.

Posted on 01/14/2008 at 2:01:31 PM

 
Hillary has been a rabid attack dog through out this campaign and I guess the 'boys' joined forces this time. Obama said early on, when asked, about her that he found her highly intelligent with good work ethnics. She constantly tells lies and disses him. They did work well together in the Senate and it is sad to see her resort to any lowness in her quest for her crown as Queen of the US of A. He would not accept VP under her. Her behavior during the campaign makes her a no choice for VP under him. I would vote Democratic if it were Obama/Clinton, but if it is Clinton/anyone I will vote for someone else. She is a GWB clone and the epitome of the corruption Obama, Kucinich and Ron Paul endeavor to change. A government of, for and by the people. Under her husband's term of office the Grand Wizard (or whatever they are called) of the KKK won his case in the Supreme Court to be allowed to burn crosses. What kind of change is that?

Posted on 01/14/2008 at 2:01:49 PM

Type in Your Comments Below
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
Most Commented On