Review and Analysis of ABC's Democratic Debate

Pulling their chairs to the table with ABC's Charles Gibson, Democrats met face to face in their first debate during their short stay in New Hampshire. Democratic candidates at Saturday evenings New Hampshire debate included Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, Barack Obama, and Bill
 Richardson.

The second of two debates on the evening of Sunday, January 5, 2008, the Democratic debate was aired immediately following the 7pm EST, republican debate. ABC News carried the debate, broadcast live from Saint Anselm College. The debate was moderated by Charles Gibson. In the last thirty minutes of the debate WMUR anchor and political director Scott Spradling asked questions.

Prior to the beginning of the democrat debate ABC orchestrated the appearance of both republican and democratic candidates on stage. Charles Gibson said the purpose of the public meet and greet was to show the nation that despite differences, all candidates are united in their desire to see a strong, united, more prosperous America.

Following an intense Republican debate Charles Gibson tossed softballs to democratic candidates.

Hillary Clinton came to the debate needing to better define her campaign and display statesmanship and tenacity in light of her 3rd place finish in Iowa. Hillary had a great night. She picked up Obama and Edward's call for change, adding a twist of her own. Clinton agreed that change was needed, and cited her 35 year record of initiating change as opposed to a few years in politics talking about change. She was very clear in the distinction between rhetoric and action, punctuating her perspective with a pointed question, asking what greater change could there be than a woman in the White House. She followed up by re-iterating she has spent her entire career as an agent of change, saying she is the one with the experience and know how to bring about change. Again and again, she directed voters to her record.

Related information
  • New Hampshire's debate pitted charismatic rhetoric against experience.
  • Hillary Clinton worked the New Hampshire debate very well.
  • Obama and Edwards strutted based on their wins in Iowa, but did little to back up calls for change.
 
Comments 1 - 10 of 22 Next >>
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

Very nicely written. Excellent information.

Posted on 01/10/2008 at 4:01:13 PM

Good article although I think the debates have been pretty anticlimatic overall.

Posted on 01/09/2008 at 4:01:09 PM

Good article

Posted on 01/09/2008 at 2:01:36 PM

I have been more interested in the debates this year than ever before.

Posted on 01/08/2008 at 6:01:25 AM

Thanks for sharing this.

Posted on 01/07/2008 at 8:01:11 AM

Great review, thanks!

Posted on 01/07/2008 at 7:01:31 AM

"I don't care for Hillary, but she put the boys under the table last night." Did I watch the same debate as you? To me, it felt as if 'the boys' were very knowledgeable and put Hillary under the table--even double-teaming her at times. 'The boys' as you call them were very calm, confident, knowledgeable and soothing, while Hillary was defensive and somewhat rude.

Posted on 01/06/2008 at 9:01:03 PM

thoughtful presentation

Posted on 01/06/2008 at 6:01:19 PM

You did an outstanding job on this Lenora~

Posted on 01/06/2008 at 5:01:15 PM

Hi Lenora. One advantage that Clinton will have is that, unlike Obama or Edwards, she is accepting six-figure campaign contributions from lobbyists and their Political Action Committees. Hillary already had her chance with health care reform and she flunked. As for experience, remember, for number of years in elective office it's Obama 11, Clinton 7, Edwards 6. Obama is the same age, 46, as was Hillary's husband when he was first elected president; she won't say HE was inexperienced. Hillary's nonelective experience includes Whitewater, Travelgate, Filegate. She made $100,000 on a $1,000 insider trading move. Meanwhile, Obama was an inner-city community organizer and a civil rights attorney. (Edwards was a liability trial lawyer, which explains his comparative wealth.) ...... Richardson deserves credit for his honest answer to the final question, what is the statement you would withdraw if you could. The others dodged. Onward, Lenora. -- Mike

Posted on 01/06/2008 at 5:01:02 PM

Comments 1 - 10 of 22 Next >>